Session Information
01 SES 06 B, Theory and Research: In Search of Improvement
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
It is universally agreed that staff development is a good thing but much money has been spent on training and development activities without a commensurate impact on pupils’ learning and wellbeing. With financial constraints hitting education systems across the world, the time is right to try to understand professional development better for as Lawless and Pellegrino (2007) state although the number of opportunities for teachers has increased, our understanding about what constitutes quality professional development, what teachers learn from it, or its impact on student outcomes has not substantially changed. Ascertaining the difference staff development makes is a complex process. Exposure to and participation in staff development activities may or may not bring about change to individuals’ beliefs, values, attitudes and behaviours. These changes to individuals may or may not lead to changes in the classroom and school practice. And these changes may or may not lead to improvement in pupil outcomes. Borko (2004) Opfer and Pedder (2011) and Timperley and Alton-Lee (2008) have argued that the problem stems from simplistic conceptualizations of teacher professional learning that fail to consider how learning is embedded in professional lives and working conditions. This paper thus explores what is known internationally about what professional development is and aims to draw up a theoretical framework that will help training and development activities have greater impact.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Borko, H. (2004). 'Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain'. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3. Bubb, S. and Earley, P. (2010). Helping Staff Develop in Schools. London: Sage. Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Kate Lin, Y.-H., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L. and Zogla, I. (2009). 'Professional development for teachers: a world of change'. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32 (1), 3-19. Desimone, L. M. (2009). 'Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures'. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199. Huber, S. G. (2011). 'The impact of professional development: a theoretical model for empirical research, evaluation, planning and conducting training and development programmes'. Professional Development in Education, 37 (5), 837-853. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). 'Who I am in how I teach is the message: self understanding, vulnerability and reflection'. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15 (2), 257-272. Lawless, K. and Pellegrino, J. (2007). 'Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers'. Review of Educational Research, 77 (4), 575. OECD (2010). Teachers’ Professional Development: Europe in international comparison. Luxemburg: OECD. Opfer, V. D. and Pedder, D. (2011). 'Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning'. Review of Educational Research, 81 (3), 376-407. Timperley, H. and Alton-Lee, A. (2008). 'Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners'. Review of Research in Education, 32 (1), 328-369. Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J. and de Vries, B. (2011). 'Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design'. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (8), 1235–1244.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.