Utilization of Collaboration Tools for Education

Session Information

ERG SES C 02, ICT in Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-09
11:00-12:30
Room:
A-102
Chair:
Shosh Leshem

Contribution

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of collabaration tools such as Teambox utilization in teaching and learning. This study is an action research with mixed design methodology in which both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods were utilized to thoroughly analyze utilization of Teambox. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire about utilization of collaboration tools. The qualitative data were collected through both individual interviews and activities on Teambox. The quantitative data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics. Coding schemes were used to convert qualitative data into quantitative data. The study, used Teambox to communicate and share documents related to the course, was conducted in a private university in Ankara, Turkey with 63 participants in a senior course that does not have regular face to face lectures. Maximum variation sampling was employed in selecting 10 students for interview.

 

The result of this study examined the advantages and disadvantages of using collaboration tool in a course and both students and instructors perception about utilization of collaboration tool. With the help of the study results, factors to design more effective and collaborative learning environments will be clarified. One of the important factors that determine the academic success of learner is the level of involvement in academic activities. This study will also examine if there is a relationship between students involvement to Teambox and student academic success. Students’ involvement in collaboration tool, Teambox, can be considered as a form of involvement. Teambox is a web-based collaboration tool, it is a hyper-growth platform of Saas applications for collaboration, file sharing and task management. Astin’s Involvement Theory is used to connect students’ involvement in collaboration tool and students’ academic success.

 

Digital tools represent new ways for participation, engagement, and collaboration. According to Lomas, Burke and Page (2008), collaboration is “the action of working with one or more other people to produce or create something". Lomas, Burke and Page (2008) also stated that collaboration have becoming synonymous with effective scholarship and collegiality. One of the essential points of collaboration is that there has to be the transition of knowledge among the group members, and usually this data transfer process is being followed by learning (Lomas, Burke & Page, 2008). By means of such digital devices individuals can share their ideas and reaction to facilitate a better understanding and to create collaborative environment for teaching and learning. Academicians and researchers are examining elements of blogs, wikis, social media, and video games into the classroom. Increasingly, social medias are serving as trust filters for teachers and students, and digital content recommended by one’s friends and acquaintances encourage web users to access particular content. However, social networks have problems in sharing and storing some types of documents such as text. Educators can make use of these networks to engage students and help them learn important skills and concepts. All those references prove that collaboration tools are powerful and useful assets for education.

Method

Mixed method was employed as part of an action-research approach. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed and combined into the research methodology of a single study (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998). Quantitative data were collected by a questionnaire with 15 questions and number of Teambox activities involved in. Qualitative data were collected by semi-structured interviews with instructors and students. Interview schedule was checked for clarity and context-specificity by help from experts. In this study, convenience sampling was used. 70 senior students and 3 instructors enrolled in the study. The study was conducted in a private university in Ankara, Turkey. Among 70 students, 10 students were selected through maximum variation sampling for interview. The course does not have face-to-face scheduled lecture hours. However, students should work as a group. Student teams performed advanced research on related IT and/or IS topics mainly focusing on new trends and technologies. At the end of the semester, they need to prepare a research thesis. Some of the topics are Mobile Communication, IS security, E-learning, Distance Education and Outsourcing. During Fall 2012, the course had 3 sections and instructed by different instructors and only in one section, Teambox was used as collaboration-tool in one the section.

Expected Outcomes

Following process of thesis and differentiating students’ works is one of the most important issues in the course and it is too difficult. To cope with this problem and to increase both quality and efficiency of the communication between group members (students) and an instructor, collaboration tools have a potential to develop cooperate learning environment. The results of this study stated that utilization of collaboration tool increased to communicate with students, construct, and direct the development of collective understanding of the survey topic and with the utilization of Teambox following students is easier in their learning process. Actually, the instructor that used Teambox as collaboration tool stated that using TeamBox was helpful to follow the process in the group work and it increased the effectiveness and efficiency of communication in the course. She instructed the course more than 3 times before this experience and she is expecting and willing to see its effect on students’ achievements. Possible factors of the different utilization and engagement in the Teambox activities were also clarified in the study. Moreover, students’ views about utilization of collaboration tool will be presented.

References

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel (Originally published July 1984), Vol: 40, No: 5, pp. 518-529. Lomas, Cyprien, Micheal Burke, and Carie L. Page (2008)"Collaboration Tools." Educause Learning Initiative.65(2)pp.1-11. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Author Information

Derya Gul (submitting)
Bilkent University
Computer Technologies and Information Systems
Ankara
Duygu Albayrak (presenting)
Bilkent University
Computer Technology and Information Systems
Ankara
Bilkent University
Computer Technology and Information Systems
Ankara

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.