Mentoring to reproduce or change discourse in Schools.

Session Information

ERG SES D 13, Professional Development and Identity

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-09
13:30-15:00
Room:
B-202
Chair:
Gulay Dalgic

Contribution

The purpose of this paper is to share findings from a Master’s study exploring teacher professional learning needs with the purpose of elucidating the needs of teachers, and mentor teachers, within the school cultural context. The rationale for the research was to find out what conditions, if any, were present that may explain the high or low levels of engagement in school-based professional learning in the two schools under examination. This study coincides with a relentless neo-liberal drive across Europe to outsource most of what was traditionally seen as state investment across all public services, including education. The research methodology is a small scale qualitative research study exploring the perceptions of experienced teachers in two secondary schools. It examines the conditions which may account for different levels of engagement in this regard. The findings were examined and reported using the conceptual framework that was developed from a distillation of the preferred literature for the study (Figure 1). These were dealt with under three main headings: teacher professional learning, personal and professional needs, and school culture. The key findings show very different levels of engagement in school based teacher professional learning in the two secondary schools. These findings have serious implications for the type of whole school mentoring that needs to be offered within schools at a time when policymakers are mandating teacher professional learning and requiring the development of critical reasoning capacities for all pupils in a global knowledge world. This study is concerned with the readiness of the experienced teacher to mentor beginning teachers, and student teachers, in ways that value co-inquiry, care, agency and critical thinking within the ecology of a whole school environment. Mentoring has become a popular construct in everyday usage. The originality of this research lies in the use of productive mentoring as a framework developed by the authors and under continual interrogation.

Method

The research compared professional development in two post-primary schools. The sample schools under study were purposively chosen. This study was exploratory in nature, limited as it was to examining the experiences and perceptions of a small group of teachers. A questionnaire, interviews and a reflective journal were the research instruments used in the study. Some 30 teachers completed the questionnaire. The use of mixed-methods to gather data enhanced the validity of the research findings. The use of semi-structured interviews provided an element of triangulation verifying the authenticity of the data collected. By triangulating the data gathered it was hoped to attempt to develop a more comprehensive account. The analysis of the findings depended on a number of key features: my informed awareness of the area from the literature review; the findings of the field research at the schools; my reflective journal along with the insights which finally emerged from a critical interpretation from all of these sources. Following on from the questionnaire semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight participants. All interviews were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. I kept a reflective journal recording insights and informative data from research articles, relevant literature and incidental conversations.

Expected Outcomes

The research established that the levels of engagement in teacher professional learning activities were much higher in School A than School B. The very different levels of engagement and the influence of the school culture appear to be major stumbling blocks to the development of teacher professional learning. This has serious implications for education systems trying to develop the critical reasoning capacities of all pupils and to develop the teacher as an inquiry-orientated, reflective and collaborative professional. It may be delusional to think that mentoring of newly qualified teachers will progress the school as a learning community without a deeper commitment to interrogate the school culture and the ways it inhibits and advances teacher professional learning. Across Europe, Ireland was heralded as the Celtic Tiger. The fruits of our past success, from Celtic times to more recent Celtic Tiger times, were reaped from a deep historical interest in learning, literature and scholarship. In this paper, mentoring was advocated as a suitable means of teacher professional learning. Productive mentoring set within a larger framing that takes critical thinking, care and agency into account has the potential to support teacher professional learning and pupil learning using a whole school learning community approach.

References

Ball, S.J. (2012), Global Education Inc. New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary, Routledge, London and New York, NY. Biesta, G.J.J. and Miedema, S. (2002), “Instruction or pedagogy? The need for a transformative conception of education”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 173-81. Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. (1999), “Teacher learning in communities”, Review of Research in Education, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 249-306. Hargreaves, A. (Ed.) (1994), “Industrialism and individuality: reinterpreting the teacher culture”, Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age, Teacher College Press, New York, NY, pp. 163-86. Hyland, A. and Hanafin, J. (1997), “Models of in-career development in the Republic of Ireland: an analysis”, Irish Education Studies, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 144-72. Mooney Simmie, G. and Moles, J. (2011), “Critical thinking, caring and professional agency: an emerging framework for productive mentoring”, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 465-82. O’Donohue, J. (1988), Anam Cara Spiritual Wisdom from the CelticWorld, Bantam Press, London. OECD TALIS (2009), “TALIS Teaching and Learning International Survey”, available at: www.erc.ie (accessed 20 March 2012). Scribner, J.D. Young, M.D. and Pedroza, A. (1999), “Building collaborative relationships with parents”, in Reyes, P. Scrinner, J.D. and Paredes Scribner, A. (Eds.), Lessons from High Performing Hispanic Schools: Creating Learning Communities, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, pp. 36-60. Stoll, L., Fink, D. and Earl, L. (2003), It’s About Learning and it’s About Time, RoutleledgeFalmer, London. Sugrue, C. (2002), “Irish teachers’ experiences of professional learning: implications for policy and practice”, Journal of In-Service Education, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 311-38. Sundli, L. (2007), “Mentoring – a new mantra for education?”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 201-14. Teaching Council (2007), Codes of Professional Conduct for Teachers, Teaching Council, Maynooth.

Author Information

Jeanne Lonergan (presenting / submitting)
University of Limerick
Department of Education and Professional Studies
Galway
University of Limerick, Ireland
University of Limerick, Ireland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.