Session Information
ERG SES C 12, Poster Session
Poster Session
Contribution
During the last few decades, Europe has been undergoing changes in the area of higher education with increasing attention to the learning of languages, particularly English language. Nowadays, most of the English taught at universities in Europe is English for Specific Purposes (ESP). In the Czech Republic, the situation of novices teaching ESP at universities is very demanding as their previous education prepared them just for teaching English for General Purposes (EGP) at secondary schools. Therefore, the objective of this research is to describe the complicated process of creating and developing their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during the first three years of university teaching.
The research is supposed to answer the following question: How is the PCK of Czech university novices teaching ESP created and developed? This relatively wide question can be divided into several sub-questions which are focused both on the general areas of teacher knowledge influencing PCK (knowledge of context, subject matter knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge) and on the individual components of PCK (conceptions of purposes for teaching subject matter, curricular knowledge, knowledge of instructional strategies, knowledge of students’ understanding) according to Grossman (1990):
- conceptions of purposes for teaching subject matter: How were teachers formulating the purposes for teaching ESP during the first 3 years of teaching?
- curricular knowledge: How were teachers acquiring and extending their knowledge of ESP curriculum organization and materials during the first 3 years of teaching?
- knowledge of instructional strategies: How were teachers acquiring and extending their knowledge of ESP instructional strategies and subject matter representations during the first 3 years of teaching?
- knowledge of students’ understanding: How were teachers finding out ESP students’ conceptions and misconceptions during the first 3 years of teaching?
- knowledge of context: How were teachers acquiring and extending their knowledge of the specifics of the university and ESP students during the first 3 years of teaching?
- subject matter knowledge: How were teachers acquiring and extending their knowledge of their students’ branch of study and ESP during the first 3 years of teaching?
- general pedagogical knowledge: How were teachers extending their general pedagogical knowledge during the first 3 years of teaching?
Research in the field of the PCK development of teachers in various fields of education utilizes a wide range of data collection methods, for example individual interviews, group interviews, text analyses or teaching observations (Brebera & Kostková, 2008; Henze, van Driel, & Verloop, 2008; Píšová, 2008, 2009; Píšová & Brebera, 2007; Seymour, 2006; Seymour & Lehrer, 2006; van Driel, Verloop, & de Vos, 1998).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Brebera, P., & Kostková, K. (2008). K možnostem zkoumání profesní kompetence učitele cizích jazyků v některých jejích doménách. In T. Janík, et al., Metodologické problémy výzkumu didaktických znalostí obsahu (pp. 51–64). Brno: Paido. Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321–1342. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&hid=103&sid=773b1111-03c7-4bd3-8f03-733852f97d31%40sessionmgr104 Píšová, M. (2008). Příspěvek k diskusi o metodologických problémech diagnostiky didaktické znalosti obsahu. In T. Janík, et al., Metodologické problémy výzkumu didaktických znalostí obsahu (pp. 37–49). Brno: Paido. Píšová, M. (2009). Od oboru k obsahu vzdělávání a učivu: z příběhu učitele-experta. Pedagogika, 59(2), 182–197. Píšová, M., & Brebera, P. (2007). K procesům utváření didaktických znalostí obsahů v raných fázích učitelské dráhy. In T. Janík, et al., Pedagogical content knowledge nebo didaktická znalost obsahu? (pp. 75–89). Brno: Paido. Seymour, J. (2006). How does pedagogical content knowledge emerge from classroom teaching? In S. Alatorre, et al., Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 805–808). Mérida: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Retrieved from http://www.pmena.org/2006/cd/TEACHER%20KNOWLEDGE/TEACHER%20KNOWLEDGE-0004.pdf Seymour, J., & Lehrer, R. (2006). Tracing the evolution of pedagogical content knowledge as the development of interanimated discourses. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 549–582. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6%3C673::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-J/pdf
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.