Session Information
10 SES 07 JS, Joint Paper Session with NW 29
Paper Session
Joint Session with NW 29
Contribution
This presentation redefines the craft of teaching into the science (what), art (how), and the business of teaching. Moreover, it then reports on the findings of a mixed methods study on the effectiveness of using elements of drama as a teaching strategy with preservice teachers to help them feel more prepared for the classroom. It must be noted that, 61% of first-year teachers stated that their training was too theoretical and did not prepare them for actual experiences in dealing with diversity within the classroom (NCCTQ, 2007; 2008). New teachers experience frustration when they begin their careers because they are unprepared for the demands on their skills, energy, and emotions (Turley, Powers & Nakai, 2006). Since most teachers leave education citing difficulties in the business aspects of teaching (Darling Hammond, 2003), more instruction in what to expect from the business of teaching can help increase teacher retention.
Previous research in the Netherlands (Coppens, H. 2002), Britain (Rosenberg & Fennelly, 1975), Finland (Toivanen, Komulainen & Ruismaki, 2009), and Australia (Ozmen, K. 2010) indicates that using process drama and role-play are successful methods for increasing achievement in K-12 schools. These teaching strategies are equally important for preservice teachers. The benefit to teacher education programs in using process drama with preservice teachers is that it will help to balance their preparedness in the art, science, and business of teaching. With a greater balance in each area, teacher education programs can send out better prepared teachers which could help in both the first year experience of the teacher and increase teacher retention. since preservice teachers tend to use the same instruction styles through which they were taught, their future students would benefit by having process drama and role-play incorporated into their classrooms thereby increasing achievement.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Coppens, H. (2002). Training teachers’ behavior. Research in Drama Education, 7(2), doi: 10.1080/1356978022000007974 Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2003). Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. NCCTQ, (2007). Lessons learned: new teachers talk about their jobs, challenges, and long-range plans. Issue No.1: They’re not little kids anymore. The Special Challenges of New Teacher in High Schools and Middle Schools. Retrieved from: http://www.publicagenda.com/files/pdf/lessons_learned_1.pdf NCCTQ, (2008). Lessons learned: new teachers talk about their jobs, challenges, and long-range plans. Issue No.3: Teaching in Changing Times. Retrieved from: http://www.publicagenda.com/files/pdf/lessons_learned_1.pdf Ozmen, K. (2010). Fostering nonverbal immediacy and teacher identity through an acting Course in English teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 1-23 Rosenberg, H. S., & Fennelly, L. W. (1975). The actor/teacher: a new idea from Britain. Education, 96(1), 50. Toivanen, T., Komulainen, K., & Ruismäki, H. (2011). Drama education and improvisation as a resource of teacher student's creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 60-69. Turley, S., Powers, K., & Nakai, K. (2006). Beginning teachers' confidence before and after induction. Action In Teacher Education, 28(1), 27-39.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.