The Education Of ‘Public-good Professionals’ In Universities
Author(s):
Melanie Walker (presenting / submitting) Monica McLean (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 02 A, Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
STD-301
Chair:
Margarida Lopes

Contribution

The paper reports on a research study into university professional education oriented to the public good and social justice, and  the development of a version of Sen (1999) and Nussbaum’s (2000, 2011) capabilities approach which could be applied to higher education policy and practices. We are of the view that the case we make for educating public-good professionals holds for all countries struggling to reduce inequality, not just South Africa where the research was conducted.   The conceptual lens of a normative capabilities-based professionalism was the yardstick for exploring the barriers, bridges, negotiations and interpretations of  professionalism and professional education aligned with social justice. Initially the capability approach was conceptualised by Sen as an approach to welfare economics and a critique of other ways of  thinking about human wellbeing. From a capabilities perspective we evaluate how well all people are doing not by looking at GDP or average income  in a country (because this does not tell us who has how much of the resources each person has), nor  by asking how satisfied people are with their lives (because people may resign themselves to bad circumstances). Rather, we would ask what people are actually ‘capable’ to be and to do in order to live good lives. Capabilities are the freedoms each person has to choose and exercise a combination  of ways of beings and doing (functionings) they have reason to value. Using this framework the research proposes that ‘public-good professionals’ would have the professional capabilities to assist the capability expansion for the poor, and to carry out agency obligations to disadvantaged others, working for more justice and less inequality for people living vulnerable and precarious lives.  The research questions asked:  how can a human development and capabilities conceptualization of professionalism and its practical realization in  professional education  in universities contribute to poverty reduction? And, how does professional education foster the values and expand the capabilities and functionings of students to make contributions to human development as practising professionals?  In this paper we focus on the educational arrangements in terms of curriculum and pedagogy in which messages are sent about ‘professional ways of being’.

Method

We conducted a qualitative interview-based case study, interviewing in depth a total of 120 students, lecturers, university managers, alumni and NGOs in five professional fields (engineering, law, public health, theology and social work) in three universities in South Africa. The project explored the pool of ‘best-case’ conceptions about what it means to be a public-good professional and this means both that we explored specific parts of curriculum designed for public-good professionalism and that we spoke to people with an interest in public-good professionalism. We can judge whether goals and processes as reported are more or less congruent with the goal of public-good professionalism. We can also report on and interpret what students said they gained from programmes of study. We did not expect to find a close a fit between educational goals (which we have expressed as capabilities), educational arrangements, and the outcomes of a teaching programme. This is because constraints operate at all levels: from the level of the individual students to the national level. We aim nonetheless to show how capabilities provides an evaluative framework and prospective applications in terms of what educational arrangements might expand public-good professional capabilities, taking into account both enabling and constraining factors.

Expected Outcomes

The key outcome is a normative ‘Public-Good Professional Capabilities Index’ combining theoretical insights with empirical data. The Index comprises four ‘meta-functionings’ of public-good professionals: eight public-good professional capabilities conceptualised as the normative goals of professional education; a set of educational arrangement likely to produce public-good professionals at departmental level and at university level; and, finally, the Index indicates the necessity of considering socio-economic and politico-historical contexts for understanding constraining and enabling factors for public-good professionalism. With regard to the education of public-good professionals, for example, in the engineering department, we found a strong emphasis on producing graduates who are the country’s best engineers: knowledgeable, analytic and practically skilled. Otherwise, we found much of the public-service curriculum residing only in the fourth-year ‘Critical Perspectives on Society’ module. To take another example, the first aim of the law curriculum we looked at is to instill graduates with a thorough disciplinary knowledge of South African law; law students are also provided with an understanding of how the profession is shaped by the historico-socio-economic-political context. We conclude with a summary across all five professions that distils educational arrangements in terms of advances towards and constraints upon university-based education for public-good professional capabilities.

References

References Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press  

Author Information

Melanie Walker (presenting / submitting)
University of the Free State
Centre for Research on Education and Human Development
Bloemfontein
Monica McLean (presenting)
University of Nottingham, UK

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.