Including a Withdrawn Pupil in Class
Author(s):
Anne-Lise Sæteren (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 A, Teacher Behaviour

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
D-505
Chair:
Stein Erik Ohna

Contribution

The research question in this presentation is: How can a teacher work to include a withdrawn pupil in the classroom activities?

The national curriculum in Norway states that the school shall be inclusive and the ideology of inclusion is strong in Norway.  Several researchers have focused on inclusive education, and according to these publications it seems like the most important and critical factor for inclusive education is the teacher (Flem & Keller, 2000; Haug, 2010; Moen, 2007; Pijl & Meijer, 1997; Stangvik, 1997). Further it seems like the regular classroom are the most important arena for inclusive education (Moen, 2007).

To be included in the class, (both social and academic), several factors needs to be “fulfilled”. Moen (2007) points out five general characteristics; “membership, mastery, togetherness, involvement and learning” (p. 17).

Withdrawn behavior describes social isolation, depression, anxiety and psychosomatic illness (Bruch & Belkin, 2001). Pupils with introvert behavior are in danger of being socially isolated and to develop psychosocial problems, which also can lead to educational problems (Befring, 2002). According to earlier studies it seems that pupils with withdrawn behavior tend to be more invisible in the classroom then their classmates, and therefore are easier for the teacher to neglect, because withdrawn children do not cause any trouble for the educational setting (Lund, 2004, 2008). Many children with introvert behavior seem to develop depression and psychosomatic illness (Befring, 2002).

Withdrawn children are often inactive, reserved and retired (Iversen, Lønberg, & Oskal, 2006). They tend not to show what they really feels and they hardly ever take the initiative. Withdrawn behavior is not a significant problem for the class, but it is a strain for the withdrawn child, who is often anxious, sad, inhibited in social relations and socially isolated. These children hardly ever seek social relations outside school, and therefore school is an important arena to practice social skills (ibid).

Management in social relations is important to build children’s self-image and self-confidence, and it is also an important element to feel pleasure (Feilberg & Mjaavatn, 2000). Managing social skills is also important to create resilience for children, which is cardinal in difficult situations, together with the premise to experience management (Iversen et al., 2006). School has the responsibility to help children with introvert behavior.

The focus in my study is on the teacher, and what she does in the classroom according to children with withdrawn behavior, and what the teacher does to include withdrawn pupils in the ordinary classroom activities, such as the class circle.

In my Phd project I have entered a classroom and studied how a particular teacher deals with withdrawn pupils in her ordinary classroom activities. In addition to the observations I have also had several interviews with my participant.

My participant teaches a class with 56 pupils, and the pupils are in the second grade in the elementary school (7 years old). One of these pupils, a girl, has withdrawn behavior. The teacher and the girl’s parents allowed me to enter the class.

Method

The research question request qualitative method. In this study narrative research are used to study how my participant experience the world, and to collect her stories. Narrative research is an interpretation of the participant’s stories. The participant’s story will, in narrative research, include the researcher’s experiences and theory. Because of this, the research report will not contain the whole story, but give us an insight in the reality that the participant has experienced (Guðmundsdóttir, 1997/2011). In addition to this the stories will also be influenced of the context and who the listener is. We might then ask; is this kind of research presenting the truth? In this connection it is important to lean up on the foundation in narrative research; the absolute truth do not exist. It is our experiences and our interpretations that make our reality (Ibid). I have observed my participant in the classroom from March 2012 until May 2012, and in this period I had several interviews with her. I have also participated in the teamwork she has with the other teachers in this class, and also when she has conversation with the withdrawn pupils’ parents.

Expected Outcomes

The answer will be search for in elucidation of characteristic traits of including as provide by Moen (2007). So far I have only analyzed a part of my collected data, and from this part I have found things the teacher does that accordance with the characteristic of mastery and involvement. I expect to find results that accordance with the other characteristics, and in this presentation I will present what this teacher does to fulfill inclusive education for withdrawn pupils.

References

Befring, E. (2002). Problematferd og forebygging. In E. Befring & R. Tangen (Eds.), Spesialpedagogikk (pp. 153-179). Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag AS. Bruch, M. A., & Belkin, D. K. (2001). Attributional Style in Shyness and Depression: Shared and Specific Maladaptive Patterns. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(3), 247-259. Feilberg, J., & Mjaavatn, P. E. (2000). De stille jentene med spesielle behov, får de den hjelpen de trenger? [Silent girls, do they get the help they need?]. Bedre skole(1), 17-31. Flem, A., & Keller, C. (2000). Inclusion in Norway: A Study of Ideology into Practice. European Journal of Specail Needs Education, 15(2), 188-205. Guðmundsdóttir, S. (1997/2011). Narrativ forskning på pedagogisk praksis. In T. Moen & R. Karlsdóttir (Eds.), Sentrale aspekter ved kvalitativ forskning (pp. 45-69). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag. Haug, P. (2010). Approaches to empirical research on inclusive education. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12(3), 199-209. Iversen, L. G., Lønberg, L. M., & Oskal, S. (2006). De usynlige elevene - teori og bakgrunn. Spesialpedagogikk(8), 22-30. Lund, I. (2004). Hun sitter jo bare der! Om innagerende atferd hos barn og unge. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Lund, I. (2008). 'I just sit there': shyness as an emotional and behavioural problem in school. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 8(2), 78-87. Moen, T. (2007). Inclusive educational practice: Result of an empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 1-29. Pijl, S. J., & Meijer, C. J. W. (1997). Factors in inclusion: a framework. In S. J. Pijl, C. J. W. Meijer & S. Hegarty (Eds.), Inclusive Education. A Global Agenda (pp. 8-13). London: Routledge. Stangvik, G. (1997). Beyond Schooling: integration in a policy perspective. In S. J. Pijl, C. J. W. Meijer & S. Hegarty (Eds.), Inclusive Education. A Global Agenda (pp. 32-50). London: Routledge.

Author Information

Anne-Lise Sæteren (presenting / submitting)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.