: How Can Artists Help Meet the Needs of Vulnerable Young People in Educational Contexts?
Author(s):
Edward Sellman (presenting / submitting) Michael Grimley
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 B, Learning Environments

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
D-501
Chair:
Lena Lang

Contribution

There has been a lively international dialogue concerning the potentiality of artists working in partnership with educational contexts, underpinned by an assumption that traditional pedagogical approaches fail to realise the creative potential of young people in general, and the vulnerable and excluded in particular.

This paper presentation discuss three key themes emerging from a thematic analysis of four research projects involving artists working with vulnerable young people (looked after young people, students with special needs, students with mental health needs and young people not in education, employment or training) in educational contexts.

Drawing upon interviews with young people, educators, artists and a range of visual methods in addition to an international review of literature, it argues that artists create safe pedagogic spaces in contrast to traditional educational activities but it will also raise questions about what constitutes such a safe space for a vulnerable participant.

It will then show that skilled and experienced artists often mediate dichotomous pedagogical positions, characterised by competency and performance. It will employ the metaphor of a trellis to illustrate how artists can provide both structure and support whilst allowing creative freedom and growth.

Finally, it will discuss the social impact of the arts through the lens of social-capital theory, highlighting the utility of the approach whilst also indicating areas for critical refinement, particularly when grouping vulnerable young people together. 

The paper will be of interest to international researchers and policmakers grappling with issues around school organisation, pedagogic practice, arts education, creative partnerships and inclusion pertinent to education across the globe in a rapidly changing century.

Method

-International review of European, American and Australian literature, informing both interview topic schedules and cross-project analysis. -Interviews with young people, artists, social workers and educators throughout the process of working with an artist. -Additional interviews with young people using photo/image elicitation techniques. -Analysis of visual media (designs, photos, websites and documentary film footage) co-produced by the particpants.

Expected Outcomes

-There is a clear social impact to working with artists, evident in enhanced pride, confidence, critical and problem solving skills. The language of social-capital theory is well placed to articulae this impact but raises questions too. Thought needs to be given to group formation so that particpants have ready access to social resources other than those provided by the artist. -The ways in which effective and experienced artists faciliate more positive educational experiences is not haphazard. There is a frequent focus on creating safe pedagogic spaces and modelling problem solving skills. However, they often have to mediate pressures on timing and end product, control and creativity and this appears to be best managed by the most effective artists by providing invisible structures.

References

-Burnard, P. & White, J. (2008) Creativity and Performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian Education, British Educational Research Journal, Vol.34, No.5, pp.667-682. -Craft, A. (2005) Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas, London: Routledge. -De Backer, F., Lombaerts, K., De Mette, T., Buffel, T. & Elias, W. (2012) Creativity in Artistic Education: Introducing Artists into Primary Schools, International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol.31, No.1, pp.53-66. -Grierson, E. (2011) Art and Creativity in the Global Economies of Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol.43, No.4, pp.336-350. -Hall, C., Thomson, P. & Russell, L. (2007) Teaching Like an Artist: The Pedagogic Identities and Practices of Artists in Schools, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol.28, No.5, pp.605-619. -McWilliam, E. & Haukka, S. (2008) Educating the Creative Workforce: New Directions for Twenty-first Century Schooling, British Educational Research Journal, Vol.34, No.5, pp.651-666. -O’Brien, A. & K. Donelan, K. (2008) The Arts and Youth at Risk: Global and Local Challenges, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Rabkin, N. & Redmond, R. (2004) Putting the Arts in the Picture: Reframing Education in the 21st Century, Chicago: Columbia College.

Author Information

Edward Sellman (presenting / submitting)
University of Nottingham
Education
Nottingham
Swinburne University of technology
Learning Transformations
Melbourne

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.