“Responding to students’ with SENs social needs: The special education teachers’ approaches”
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 A, Teacher Behaviour

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
D-505
Chair:
Stein Erik Ohna

Contribution

It has been well-documented that children’s social functioning constitutes a crucial aspect of their development, with implications for school and later life adjustment (Brolyn, & Loyd, 2004; Gresham, Sugai, & Horner, 2001). Considering that social competence has been associated with academic, vocational and long-term life success is not altogether surprising that a large body of research has focused on the difficulties that students with Special Educational Needs (SENs) encounter in the social domain. Such difficulties may be, among others, related to: establishing and maintaining social relationships with peers (Sheepstra, Nakken, & Pijl, 1999), demonstrating prosocial behaviours (Lord, & Magil-Evans, 1995), following rules and adhering to discipline standards in the classroom (Voltz, Brazil, & Ford, 2001), and self-regulating emotions and behaviour (Wight, & Chapparo, 2008). The potential importance of the social skills outlined above across several aspects of students’ with SENs adjustment has contributed to the advocacy of educational interventions targeting social development as a means of promoting their successful inclusion (Moncy, Pijl, & Zandberg, 2004). Hence, research on inclusive education, should investigate teachers’ preparation and readiness to address the social needs and difficulties of their students and implement effective interventions to target social objectives (Pavri, & Hegwer-DiVita, 2006; Pavri, 2004).

Ascertaining special teachers’ views is considered to be a necessary prerequisite for supporting inclusive provision as their insights and experiences may inform intervention practices and potentially contribute to improvements in the field (Pavri & Hegwer-Divita, 2006; Pavri & Monda-Amaya, 2001). It has been, for example, well-documented that special educators in collaboration with their mainstream counterparts play an important role in developing a supportive social climate in the classroom that fosters positive interactions among peers, promotes mutual acceptance and healthy rapport which in turn facilitate children’s social and emotional growth. Having a plethora of opportunities to observe students’ social behavior in a variety of situations, teachers are considered to be key informants in identifying critical components of social competence that may be incorporated in educational programs and activities targeting children’s social skills development. At the same time, they are among those professionals who are actively involved in addressing individual needs in the social domain that may inform intervention tasks and promoting evidence-based responses to children with SENs.

In the light of the above, the study aims to explore Greek special education teachers’ readiness to adequately address their students’ social needs and investigate the kind of intervention strategies they employ for responding to their social skills difficulties. The collected data provide answers to the following research questions:

  • Whether Greek students’ with SENs social skills difficulties are being truly addressed by their teachers.
  • What kind of intervention strategies Greek special teachers employ for responding to their students’ social needs and difficulties.
  • Which are the perceived limitations underpinning Greek primary education special teachers’ interventions and their suggestions for enhancing their effectiveness.

Method

The sample of the study consisted of forty Greek special education teachers appointed in resource rooms operating within mainstream primary schools. A combination of a questionnaire and semi-structured interview procedures were employed for the collection of data. The later sought to explore the intervention strategies teachers employ for responding to their students’ social skill difficulties and their suggestions for improving their effectiveness. The data were coded and analyzed according to the principles of the inductive data-driven analysis approach. Participants’ responses were identified and distinguished under the questions that comprised the interview schedule. Then, the investigators began the process of the first-level thematic coding line-by-line. Descriptive codes that attribute meaning to particular units of qualitative information were developed to exhaust the data. The codes were then clustered into inductive categories and sub-categories to describe the emerged themes. Inadequate categories were excluded from the initial list. The revised set of thematic codes was applied to the whole sample via a ‘within-case’ and a ‘cross-case’ process analysis in an effort to find commonalities and differences among the cases.

Expected Outcomes

The participants used a number of strategies in order to respond to students’ with SENs social needs and difficulties. These strategies were implemented at an individualized or a small group base mainly outside the regular classroom and the resource room setting. The most frequently reported strategies were the creation of caring relationships with students; the development of trust and rapport; the provision of an environment in which students feel safe, valued and have a sense of belonging; discussion of the issues of concern with the target students and the provision of emotional support when needed; the creation of opportunities for social interactions with peers; and the incorporation of a special interest into group-work activities for building self-esteem. The participants reported less frequent use of specific strategies and curricula for promoting social competence while little reference was made in embedding social skills instruction naturally throughout the school day or in specific classroom activities. Alarmingly, teachers had not set any specific goals upon which to base the intervention plan. Thus, most strategies were rather compartmentalized, unplanned and not applied in a systematic manner. A number of organizational, structural and relational deficiencies were identified as contributing to the failure of applying more systematic school-wide interventional approaches.

References

Brolin, D. E., & Loyd, R. J. (2004). Career development and transition services- a functional life skills approach (4th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson. Gresham, F., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional children, 67(3), 331-34. Lord, C., & Magill-Evans, J. (1995). Peer interactions of autistic children and adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 611-626. Monchy, M., Pijl, S. J., & Zandberg, T. (2004). Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 317-330. Pavri, S. (2004). General and special education teachers’ preparation needs in providing social support: a needs assessment. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 77-87. Pavri, S., & Hegwer-DiVita, M. (2006). Meeting the social and emotional needs of students with disabilities: the special educators’ perspective. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 139-153. Pavri, S., & Monda-Amaya, L. (2001). Social support in inclusive schools: students and teacher perspectives. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 391-411. Scheepstra, A. J. M., Nakken, H., & Pijl, S. J. (1999). Contacts with classmates: the social position of pupils with Down’s syndrome in Dutch mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14(3), 212-220. Voltz, D., Brazil, N., & Ford, A. (2001). What matters most in inclusive education: A practical guide for moving forward. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(1), 23-30. Wight, M., & Chapparo, C. (2008). Social competence and learning difficulties: Teacher perceptions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55, 256-265.

Author Information

Eleni Didaskalou (submitting)
University of Thessaly
Department of Special Education
Volos
Anastasia Vlachou (presenting)
University of Thessaly, School of Humanities
Department of Special Education
Volos
Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Greece

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.