Participation And Language Learning In The Multilingual Pre-Primary Classroom
Author(s):
Delia Wirtz (presenting / submitting) Charles Max
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 05, Education and Languages

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-09
13:30-15:00
Room:
A-105
Chair:
Dennis Beach

Contribution

About 45 % of the population of Luxembourg is of foreign origins. The Lusophone community, burgeoning from the early seventies on, forms the largest group The conspicuous multilingual and multicultural population, their diverse and altering demands generate complex challenges for public education (Portante & Max 2008). In preschool, children aged 4 to 6 learn Luxembourgish as the common language for integration and everyday interaction. This qualitative study focuses on 4 to 6 year old children of Portuguese, Cap Verdean and Brazilian origins negotiating the construction of a participation framework during story narration within the multilingual pre-primary classroom.

School socializes children into listening to stories told by the teachers following the practices in line with the historical tradition of the institution (e.g., Rogoff 1990). However, the analysis of data (transcribed video recordings) show how children within such a listening-to-reading situation (don’t) display orientation towards the acknowledged practices. Specifically, issues such as positioning and negotiation of positioning, ratification of topics, relevance of a particular mode of interaction, power relationships, changing expert-novice roles among peers etc. arise from the analysis of the participation framework (Goodwin 1981, 2000).

In the multilingual classroom, communicating, expressing ideas and organising interaction is organised around a cultural artefact called “story book”. A preliminary study (Wirtz 2010) focuses on pedagogical instances of this cultural tool. It emphasises the supported/not-supported construction of a participation framework within the preschool learning context. More specifically, it shows how children of different cultural backgrounds rely on various modes for interacting with each other and making sense of their environment. The importance of such a “space of joint action” becomes evident in considering the space of relations and embodied reciprocated tunings occurring in the concrete space of interaction and accomplished on different levels such as speech, posture, gestures, artefact- and sign-mediated actions, joint perceptions and so forth (Radford & Roth 2010).

Method

Moving beyond language as the main mode of making meaning opens up perspectives on the significance of other modes for interaction such as gazes, body posture, hand movements, facial expression, manipulation of artifacts etc. in understanding and shaping social interaction. Twelve children from three Luxembourgish preschool classes are at the heart of this investigation. Groups of four children have been videotaped during a story narrating activity (Ard & Beverly 2004) as done by the teacher and, later, as they manipulate the same book without adult’s guidance. The transcription of these video recordings gives way to a sequence-by-sequence analysis (Schegloff 2007) of the joint construction of the participation framework by children “doing being” the listeners. Furthermore, a questionnaire was distributed to the caregivers in order to find out more about the dynamic language environment that shapes the children’s home context and their attitude towards language and literacy (Owocki 2002) – in contrast to the static unit that is symbolized by nationality and hints at predefined language borders.

Expected Outcomes

Results point to different types of listening as achieved by children with some systematics. Different modes are ratified or rejected by the teachers and/or the children while constructing the participation framework of listening within the schooling setting (movement vs. no movement, interruptions vs. sequential turn allocation, organisation of “narrative space”). The authors discuss a) how various modes, introduced by the children, are valued (or not) within the school context and b) how socio-culturally sensitive orientations towards the resources brought in as “doing listening” by the children can nurture novel approaches of learning-teaching in multicultural contexts.

References

Ard, L. M., & Beverly, B. L. (2004). Preschool word learning during joint book reading: Effect of adult questions and comments. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26(1), 17-28. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522. Owocki, G., & Goodman, Y. (2002). Kidwatching. Documenting children's literacy development. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Radford Roth (2010) Portante, D., & Max, Ch. (2009). Plurilingualism and Multilingual Literacy among Young Learners in Luxembourg. In: Kenner, Charmian/Hickey, Tina (eds.). Multilingual Europe: Diversity and Learning. London: Trentham Books. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wirtz, D. (2010). La construction du cadre de participation par un apprenant en luxembourgeois. Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Author Information

Delia Wirtz (presenting / submitting)
University of Luxembourg
Imbringen
University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.