Beyond Reflective Practice: the Frames of Reference That Shape Beginning Teachers’ Learning From Experience
Author(s):
Trevor Mutton (presenting / submitting) Katharine Burn (presenting) Hazel Hagger
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 01 A, Reflecting on Reflective Practice

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
13:15-14:45
Room:
A-201
Chair:
Peter Gray

Contribution

The differences between the formal programmes of study that trainee teachers follow in different European countries and across the world are well documented (Eurydice 2002; Britton et al 2003, OECD 2005), but less well known is the extent to which beginning teachers’ orientations towards their own professional learning might be strong determinants of the success or otherwise of that learning. While we might expect the majority of beginning teachers, particularly during their initial training, to draw on a range of different sources to inform their professional learning and development, we cannot assume that this will necessarily be maintained in the initial stages of a teaching career. Our own previous findings show that while trainee teachers all claim to learn from experience, and in so doing may develop the required levels of classroom competence, there is no guarantee that experience in itself will automatically result in the development of strategies to ‘sustain and take forward their learning once the resources and support structures of the ITE programme [are] removed’ (Mutton et al., 2010:89). If genuine learning is to continue beyond the supported induction phase, it is vitally important to establish secure foundations for it in the early stages (Hagger et al.,2008), enabling and inspiring teachers to strive for continued improvement, for example, through ‘collaborative engagement ‘ with opportunities for continuing professional development (Kennedy, 2011).

 

This paper focuses on one element of beginning teachers’ orientations towards learning – their ‘frame of reference’, one of five categories (or dimensions) within an established analytical framework. This framework was developed originally in order to categorise beginning teachers’ orientations towards learning from experience in the PGCE year (Hagger et al. 2008) and was subsequently tested and refined, first in light of the lesson-based interviews conducted with the same teachers in their first and second years of qualified practice, and then in relation to their more general reflections on their learning.  Each dimension is represented as a continuum with opposing orientations at either end.

 

Thus ‘frame of reference’ (referring to the extent to which beginning teachers look beyond their own experience in order to make sense of it) is represented at one end of the continuum by teachers who draw on a wide ranges of sources to shape and inform their experience, and at the other end by an almost exclusive reliance on the experience of classroom teaching itself. In addition, not only is the range of these sources important, but also the teachers’ capacity to use the resources available to them in as rich a way as possible.

 

The questions informing our analysis are:

 

  1. How does such a ‘frame of reference’ manifest itself in the learning of beginning teachers?
  2. To what extent is there variation in the ‘frame of reference’ across individuals and within individuals over time (i.e. during the initial training year and through the first two years of full-time teaching)?

Method

The data were collected as part of a three-year longitudinal study of beginning teachers in England, following students on a one-year secondary Postgraduate Certificate of Education (PGCE) course through their initial training and subsequently through the first two years of their teaching career. On four occasions in the PGCE year and on three occasions in each of the subsequent two years the beginning teachers were observed teaching a lesson, and then interviewed by the researcher who had observed it. The interview schedule, developed with reference to the approach used by Brown and McIntyre (1993), followed a basic agenda concerned with the student teachers’ perceptions of the lesson. Its purpose was to seek their thinking in relation to planning, conducting and evaluating that lesson, and their reflections on the learning that informed, or resulted from, the lesson. Within an overall phenomenological approach a series of analytical categories related to the process of learning from experience were developed through an iterative, inductive process using transcribed data. Five distinct dimensions were identified and formulated as ‘opposable orientations, dichotomous categories’ (Bullough, Young, and Draper 2004, 368), representing aspects of development over time.

Expected Outcomes

Emergent findings suggest that what we have termed ‘frame of reference’ is an interesting dimension in relation to beginning teachers’ learning and we will present case study profiles of individuals who demonstrated different orientations within this dimension, examining the extent to which they drew on sources of learning beyond the classroom and the influence that changes in orientation had on their continuing development. Our findings show that not only are there variations, as one would expect, across individuals but also within individuals over time. This has implications for all teacher educators, regardless of particular national contexts in which they are working, for whom it might be highly beneficial to be able to identify an individual student teacher’s orientation in relation to this dimension and to understand more fully what happens when beginning teachers move from their initial training and develop further as professionals. Given the fact that orientations within this dimension of learning are not unchangeable, there is scope not only for initial teacher educators to help secure its foundations, but also for those supporting induction to establish a more productive orientation towards continuing professional development. We intend, in our presentation, to suggest ways in which this might be achieved.

References

Britton, E., Payne, L., Pimm, D. & Raizen, S. (2003) Comprehensive teacher induction. London, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Brown, S. & McIntyre, D. (1993) Making Sense of Teaching (Buckingham, Open University Press). Bullough, R.V. Jr., J. Young, and R.J. Draper. 2004. One-year teaching internships and the dimensions of beginning teacher development. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 10, (4) 365–94. Eurydice (2002) The teaching profession in Europe: Profile trends and concerns. Report 1: Initial training and transition to working life (Brussels, European Commission) Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T. & Brindley, S. (2008) Practice makes perfect? Learning to learn as a teacher, Oxford Review of Education, 34 (2) 159-178 Kennedy, A. (2011) Collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers in Scotland: aspirations, opportunities and barriers, European Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (1) 25-41 Mutton, T., Burn, K. and Hagger, H. (2010) 'Making sense of learning to teach: learners in context', Research Papers in Education, 25 (1) 73-91. OECD (2005) Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers (Paris, OECD Publications)

Author Information

Trevor Mutton (presenting / submitting)
University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Katharine Burn (presenting)
Institute of Education, University of London
London
Oxford University
Education
Oxford

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.