Lost in Translation: Entrepreneurship in School from Policy into Practice
Author(s):
Jaana Nehez (presenting / submitting) Carina Holmgren (presenting) Tiia Randma Elena Ruskovaara
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES G 01, Education Policies and Professional Development

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-101
Chair:
Yavuz Samur

Contribution

In line with a growing policy interest for entrepreneurship as a solution for economic growth and welfare, there is an interest for introducing entrepreneurship into all levels of the educational systems in European countries. All EU member states have agreed to integrate entrepreneurship into school curricula. To integrate entrepreneurship into the education systems is however a challenging process. Research concerning the lower levels of the education system expresses different aspects of problems concerning the process of translating entrepreneurship into primary and secondary schools’ practice. These aspects deal with the tensions that the concepts create due to the backpack of meanings from the business and economic sectors and problems to internalize entrepreneurship.

By taking a point of departure in the translation challenges the purpose of this paper is to analyze similarities and differences between the education systems in three countries, Estonia, Finland, and Sweden. The comparison is between policy documents and implementation of these documents as well as challenges concerning translating entrepreneurship from policy intentions to education practice in lower education.

The theoretical framework consists of translation theory in Scandinavian institutionalism and policy implementation theory. Translation in this paper means more than linguistic interpretations; it concern transformation – how something is transformed when transferred to new organisations and contexts. In the gap between the policy idea of entrepreneurship education, the distance between, in this case, the policy ideas and the school forms a space for translating, filling in and interpreting the ideas in various ways.

Entrepreneurship in the educational system is as slippery and confusing as the entrepreneurship concept itself.  ‘Entrepreneurship education’ is often used by politicians and researchers interchangeably with concepts like ‘enterprise education’, but there is a difference between the concpets. The primary focus of entrepreneurship education is on starting, growing and managing a business, whereas the primary focus of enterprise education is on the acquisition and development of personal skills, abilities and attributes that can be used in different contexts and throughout the life course. Enterprise education, also referred to as entrepreneurial learning, is by politicians stronger proposed for the lower levels of the education system and entrepreneurship education for the higher levels. According to this we use the notion entrepreneurship in school as a general concept and use the concept entrepreneurship education when referring to the business association, and the concept enterprise education when referring to the wider definition.

Method

This paper is based on analysis of policy documents concerning entrepreneurship in the primary and secondary schools in Estonia, Finland and Sweden and meta-analysis of data gathered in the authors’ previous research projects amongst teachers and principals working with entrepreneurship in school . The meta-analysis is based on studies from all three countries, with different approaches, within different research traditions and on a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods. These methods used in the different studies include document analysis, interview studies, observations and questionnaires.

Expected Outcomes

In all three countries entrepreneurship is embedded in the national curricula with the purpose to be implemented as pedagogy in every subject, and as a content in higher levels. Despite that entrepreneurship has been part of the curriculum in Finland for nearly 20 years, and only very recently in Estonia and Sweden, challenges in translating entrepreneurship into education practice have been reported from all three countries. Some aspects of these challenges can be understood by comparing lower and higher education. Teachers in higher education involved in entrepreneurship are well educated in this academic field. Teachers in primary and secondary school are educated in a diversity of subjects and take their point of departure in pedagogic. Since most of the research going on in the field concern higher education teachers and principals in lower education cannot get direct help from that either. As an implication for practice we aim at clarifying challenges in the translation processes for policy makers. We suggest the policy makers to pay attention to how existing structures support the possibilities to translate policy aims into entrepreneurship and enterprise education. Our findings strengthen the importance of further research concerning the translation process in primary and secondary schools.

References

Backström-Widjeskog, B. (2010). Teachers’ thoughts on entrepreneurship education, In Skogen, K. & Sjøvoll, J. (eds), Creativity and Innovation: Preconditions for Entrepreneurial Action, Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press. Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds) (1996). Translating Organizational Change, Berlin: de Gruyter. European Commission (2004). Action Plan for Entrepreneurship, Brussels: European Commission. Gorman, G., Hanlon, D., & King, W. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review, International Small Business Journal. 15(3), 56-79. Holmgren, C.A. (2012). Translating entrepreneurship into the education setting – a case of societal entrepreneurship, In Berglund K., Johannisson, B. Schwarz, B. (eds), Societal entrepreneurship - Positioning, Penetrating and Promoting, forthcoming on Edward Elgar 2012. Hytti, U. & O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries, Education + Training, Vol. 46, Iss: 1 pp. 11-23. Jones, B. & Iredale, N. (2010). Enterprise education as pedagogy, Education + Training, 52 (1), 7-19. Leffler, E. (2009). The Many Faces of Entrepreneurship: the discursive battle for the school arena, European Educational Research journal, (8) 1, 104-116. Lundquist, L. (1987). Implementation Steering. An Actor-Structure Approach, Studentlitteratur, Lund. Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21.århundrets organisasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Sahlin-Anderson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields, In Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds), Translating Organizational Change, Berlin: de Gruyter. Seikkula-Leino, J., E. Ruskovaara, M. Ikävalko, J. Mattila & T. Rytkölä (2010). Promoting entrepreneurship education: the role of the teacher? Education + Training, 52(2), 117-127.

Author Information

Jaana Nehez (presenting / submitting)
University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg
Carina Holmgren (presenting)
Mälardalen University, Sweden
Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia
Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.