Employment Prospects and Successful Transitions to Adulthood: The Case of Deaf Young People
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 C, Vocational Training

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
15:15-16:45
Room:
D-314
Chair:
Jari Linikko

Contribution

People with disabilities are at high risk of social exclusion, starting from the early stages of education. In many cases, the risk of social marginalisation increases as they grow into adults, as young disabled people are less likely to participate in post-16 education and training (Directorate-General for Education and Culture [DG-EAC], 2012).  This has significant consequences on the employment rates and net income of working-age disabled people. In the past 5 years, the employment rates of disabled people in the UK who report a ‘work-limiting disability’ and at the same time are classed as ‘disabled’ have been less than half of that for non-disabled people (Hills at al., 2010; Riddell, Edward, Weedon & Ahlgren, 2010; Meager & Higgins, 2011).

Although clearly not as disadvantaged as people with other types of impairment (such as people with mental health conditions or with learning disabilities; see Meager & Higgins, 2011), people who are deaf and hard ofhearing also seem to face barriers in finding and staying in employment. Between 2002 and 2008, the Office for Disability Issues in the United Kingdom reported employment rates ranging between 56 - 58% for hearing impaired people, whereas approximately 80% of non-disabled people were in employment (Riddell et al., 2010). This situation is echoed elsewhere. For instance, in 2005 63% of all graduates of Swedish special schools for the deaf (aged 25-64) were in employment, as opposed to an estimated 78% of the general population (Rydberg, Coniavitis Gellerstedt & Danermark, 2010).

In a review of data on employment outcomes for deaf and hard of hearing people, Punch, Hyde & Creed (2004) conclude that ‘relative to their hearing peers, deaf adults have been found to be less educated, to experience more unemployment and underemployment, and to have lower incomes’ (p.30), and suggest that the reasons for this lie with generally lower literacy and educational achievement outcomes, attitudinal and environmental barriers, and lower levels of career maturity and decision-making competency of deaf adolescents.

The present study analyses the educational and employment outcomes of deaf and hard of hearing young people in Scotland, by looking at their transition processes from compulsory schooling to training, employment, and further or higher education. For reasons brevity, the term ‘deaf’ is  used in the remainder of this paper to indicate people with all levels of hearing loss.  The following research questions are addressed:

  • What are the post-school destinations of deaf young people in Scotland and how do these compare with those of non-disabled young people and young people with other types of additional support needs?
  • What barriers are encountered by deaf young people in accessing post-school education, employment and training opportunities?
  • For deaf young people, how do their post-school destinations impact on their ability to achieve other important markers of adulthood, such as independent living arrangements and the formation of independent relationships?
  • What factors promote ‘successful’ post-school transitions?

Method

There are three main strands in this research: (1) a comparative analysis of publicly available statistics on the post school education, employment and training destinations and outcomes of young people who are deaf and hard of hearing, young people with any additional support needs, and young people with no additional support needs; (2) key informant interviews with policy-makers and professionals working with deaf young people; (3) semi-structured interviews with deaf young people aged 18-24. Interview questions focused on their school experience, their post-school transitions experiences, the support they received and barriers they encountered after leaving school, and well as issues related to identity and agency. The interviewees were selected purposively with regard to level of educational attainment, employment status, preferred mode of communication (manual vs. oral), socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender and geographical location, to ensure that their social profile matches that of the wider population of deaf young people in Scotland.

Expected Outcomes

Preliminary results suggest that deaf school leavers with higher qualifications have better prospects of making successful transitions. They are more likely to enter higher education, where they benefit from financial, communication and pastoral support through Disability Offices within universities. This increases their chances of completing the course and finding employment. However, they represent only a small proportion of the deaf school leavers. According to the Scottish Pupil Census, in the last five years only 15% of all deaf school leavers entered Higher Education. The majority of deaf school leavers had lower qualifications, and entered Further Education (49%), paid employment (14%), vocational training courses (8%), voluntary work (2%), or were unemployed (12%). This shows a greater spread in the post-school outcomes of deaf young people, as compared to those of their non-disabled peers. In addition, deaf young people who leave school with lower qualifications are less likely to receive adequate support, and more likely to encounter communication and attitudinal barriers. Although Further Education is their destination of choice, they tend to be underrepresented in mainstream training programmes; many deaf young people are on life skills programmes, which are designed for people with disabilities and are not a direct route to employment.

References

Directorate-General for Education and Culture. (2012). Education and disability/special needs policies and practice in education, training and employment for students with disabilities and special educational needs in the EU: an independent report prepared for the European Commission by the NESSE network of experts. Brussels: EC. Edward, S., Riddell, S., O’Neill, R., & Weedon, E. (2009). The Impact of the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 on Deaf Children. CREID, University of Edinburgh. Hills, J., Brewer, M., Jenkins, S., Lister, R., Lupton., R., Machin, S., …Riddell, S. (2010). An anatomy of economic inequality in the UK: Report of the National Equality Panel. London: Government Equalities Office Meager, N., & Higgins, T. (2011). Disability and skills in a changing economy. Briefing Paper Series: UK Commission for Employment and Skills. Punch, R., Hyde, M., & Creed, P. A. (2004). Issues in the school-to-work transition of hard of hearing adolescents. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 28-38. Riddell, S., Edward, S., Weedon, E., & Algren, L. (2010). Disability, skills and employment: A review of recent statistics and literature on policy and initiatives. Research Report 59, Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission. Rydberg, E., Coniavitis Gellerstedt, L., & Danermark, B. (2010). The position of the deaf in the Swedish labour market. American Annals of the Deaf, 155, 68-77.

Author Information

Mariela Fordyce (presenting / submitting)
University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh
School of Education
Edinburgh
University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.