Foreign language learning strategies use and support in upper secondary level schools in the Czech Republic– further results
Author(s):
Jana Přikrylová (Chlápková) (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Poster

Session Information

27 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2013-09-11
12:30-14:00
Room:
FUAYE
Chair:

Contribution

Learning strategies are an integral part of learning in each school subject, including foreign languages.

The first research study on second language learning strategies was conducted by Rubin (1975). Later on, Wenden and Rubin (1987, p. 19)  defined learning strategies as "any sets of operations, steps, plans, routines used by the learner to facilitate the obtaining, storage, retrieval, and use of information".  According to Richards and Platts (1992, p. 209), learning strategies make understanding and comprehension of language instruction easier and are a part of intentional behaviour. Chamot and O'Malley (1990, p. 5; 2006, p. 5) regard strategies especially as tools for self-regulated learning. Oxford (1989, p. 8) defines learning strategies as "specific actions taken by the learner to make learning easier, faster, more enjoyable, more self-directed, more effective and more transferrable to new situations". She distinguishes six groups of foreign language learning strategies (FLLS): the direct strategies - memory strategies, cognitive strategies and compensation strategies and the indirect - strategies metacognitive strategies, affective strategies and social strategies. This typology is applied in our research.  
In research on learning strategies, questionnaires are the most used method of data collection. We use the Language Strategy Use Survey by Cohen, Oxford and Chi (2002) created within the concept of Style-and Strategies-Based Instruction (SSBI) of Cohen and Weaver (2006, p. 3), which we used in our research. This questionnaire focuses primarily on English language students for whom English is not the mother tongue. The questionnaire examines the FLLS in the context of the 4 language skills (listening, writing, reading and speaking) and two linguistic aspects (vocabulary, translation). The aim of our research (Vlčková & Přikrylová, 2010a, b) was to measure the use of foreign language learning strategies by pupils and the support of strategy use by teacher. 

In this paper, we present the results concerning pupils´ use of FLLS and the teacher´s support of pupils´ FLLS. The research was carried out at grammar schools (comprehensive upper secondary level of education - ISCED 3) in 2011. Out of 914 respondents 901 were pupils and 13 were teachers (teachers of student respondents). 

Research questions concerned three areas:

×          The use of the strategies by pupils

×          The support of the strategies by teachers

×          The relation between the FLLS use (pupils) and the support (teachers)

In the third area, we formulated the following hypotheses:

H1: The more the teacher supports pupils´ foreign language learning strategies, the more pupils use them.

H1.1: The more the teacher supports pupils´ foreign language learning strategies for particular skills or linguistic aspects, the more the pupils use them.

H1.2: The more the teacher supports pupils´ foreign learning strategies according to Oxfords´ 6 groups of strategies, the more the pupils use them.

Method

To investigate pupils´ use of FLLS, we adapted the questionnaire Language Strategy Use Survey (SSBI 2006) for the Czech context. To investigate teachers´ support of pupils´ strategy use, a new questionnaire was created, for which items from the pupils´ questionnaire were adjusted. Respondents expressed their level of agreement with statements about using or supporting strategies on a reduced and changed four-point scale (no = 1, rather no than yes = 2, rather yes than no = 3, yes = 4). The average rate of strategy use and support showed a normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: pupils questionnaire d = .07, p = 0.10), teachers questionnaire d = .14, p = .20) Instrument reliability was measured by Cronbach alpha coefficient (α = 0.97), which indicates high reliability of pupils (α = .97) as well as the teachers questionnaire (α = .97).

Expected Outcomes

The comparison of the results of the teachers´ and pupils´ questionnaire are processed from several perspectives, using strategies from the perspective of the respondents such as gender, their field of study or year of study. From the perspective of language functions (see Oxford, 1990) the results show inequalities in the FLLS pupils´ use and their support by the teacher. Pupils use direct and indirect strategies less than teachers say they support them. Teachers almost equally support direct (x = 3.21, SD = 0.27) and indirect (x = 3.33, SD = 0.34) strategies and also pupils use both of these groups of strategies at a similar degree (direct strategies: x = 2, 66, SD = 0.31; indirect strategies: x = 2.65, SD = 0.35). T-test shows significant differences between the strategy use by pupils and strategy support by teachers for direct strategies p= 0.01 and for indirect ones p = 0.35). Statistical significance of the differences will be tested.

References

Chamot, A. U. & O´Malley, J. M. (1994): The CALLA Handbook. New York: ESL Publishing Group. Cohen, A. D. & Weaver. S. J. (2006): Styles and Strategie Based Instruction. Minesota (USA): The Board of Regents. Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983): Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman. O´Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990): Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oxford, R. L. (2009): Language Learning Strategies [on-line]. USA: Centre of Applied Linguistics. URL: http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/oxford01.html. Oxford, R. L. (1985): New Taxonomy of Second Language Learning Strategies. Washington, D. C.: ERIC Clearing House on Languages and Linguistics. Oxford, R. L. (1990): Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publisher. Rubin, J. & Wenden, A. (1987): Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Herefordshire: Prentice Hall International. Rubin, J. (1989): How learner strategies can inform language teaching. In Proceedings of Lultac. Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Education, Department of Education. Vlčková, K. & Přikrylová, J. (2010a): Dotazník strategií učení cizímu jazyku [Foreign language learning strategies questionnaire]. Prague, NÚOV. URL: http://www.nuov.cz/ae/dotaznik-strategii-uceni-cizimu-jazyku. Vlčková, K. & Přikrylová, J. (2010b): Dotazník strategií učení cizímu jazyku pro studenty středních škol [Foreign language learning strategies questionnaire for grammar school students]. Prague, NÚOV. URL: http://aplikace.mecops.cz/nuovckk_portal/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=EH7c8Foy5rg%3d&tabid=90&mid=431&language=cs-CZ.

Author Information

Jana Přikrylová (Chlápková) (presenting / submitting)
Faculty of Education, Masaryk University Brno
The Institute for Research in School Education
Kroměříž

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.