Session Information
11 SES 12 B, Teaching Professionalism and Inspection of Education
Paper Session
Contribution
In line with the various theoretical models of educational quality in educational effectiveness research and with the concepts of self-efficacy and opportunities to learn, the aim of this contribution is to predict the differences in reading competencies and reading enjoyment of students at grade nine. Specific teacher and student beliefs and practices such as efficacy expectations and learning opportunities in reading lessons concerning educational standards for reading at school and classroom level were introduced as predictors. The analyses are based on the extended sample of the PISA-2009-study in Germany.
The main focus of the international PISA-studies is the systematic description and the international comparison of student competencies and selected indicators of learning environment and school policies. However, country-specific analyses of the relationship between student competencies and school indicators accomplished by the OECD do not show consistent patterns of correlations, in particular if they control for the social background of students. Analyzing PISA data from an extended sampling design, which allows for analyses on a classroom level – like in Germany – the analyses show positive correlations between certain classroom indicators such as classroom management and cognitive activation and student competencies as well as positive correlations between teacher support and motivation. Nevertheless, there is still a need for advanced information of school and classroom characteristics that may have an impact on student outcomes. This contribution trys to identify specific learning conditions in the reading domain at school and at classroom level, that can explain differences in reading competencies and reading enjoyment of students and can serve as starting points for improving reading instruction. Teachers’ and students’ efficacy expectations related to reading are important cognitions that might predict specific student reading competencies and motivation, as they are assumed to be based on positive reading experiences and the mastery and comprehension of difficult and substantial reading tasks. The efficiency expectations of teachers and students as well as the frequency of reading tasks in German lessons as specific learning environment can be referred to reading requirements that are defined in the educational standards in the subject German in the domain of reading.
Investigating these relationships, three research questions are addressed in this contribution: 1. How large is the variance of reading competencies and reading enjoyment of students at individual, classroom and school level, that can be explained by classroom and school level factors? 2. Is there a correlation between the efficiency expectations and practices of teachers at school level the corresponding cognitions and practices perceived by students at the classroom level? 3. To what extend can student reading competencies and motivation be predicted by the shared efficiency expectations and practices of teachers at school level and the shared efficiency expectations and practices of students at classroom level?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133-180. Hochweber, J., Steinert, B. & Klieme, E. (2012). Lehrerkooperation, Unterrichtsqualität und Lernergebnisse im Fach Englisch. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40 (4), 351-370. Klieme, E., Artelt, C., Hartig, J., Jude, N., Köller, O., Prenzel, M., Schneider, W. & Stanat, P. (Hrsg.) (2010). PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt. Münster: Waxmann. Klieme, E., Steinert, B. & Hochweber, J. (2010). Zur Bedeutung der Schulqualität für Unterricht und Lernergebnisse. In W. Bos, E. Klieme & O. Köller (Hrsg.), Schulische Lerngelegenheiten und Kompetenzentwicklung. Festschrift für Jürgen Baumert (S. 231-255). Münster: Waxmann. KMK (2003). Vereinbarung über Bildungsstandards für den Mittleren Schulabschluss (Jahrgangsstufe 10). http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2003/2003_12_04-Bildungsstandards-Mittleren-SA.pdf, 23. Mai 2012. OECD (2010). Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes. Paris: OECD. OECD (2011). PISA 2009 Ergebnisse: Was macht eine Schule erfolgreich? – Lernumfeld und schulische Organisation in PISA (Band IV). Paris: OECD. Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Seidel, T. & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454-499. Steinert, B., Hartig, J. & Klieme, E. (2008). Institutionelle Bedingungen sprachlicher Kompetenzen. In DESI-Konsortium (Hrsg.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (S. 411-450). Weinheim: Beltz.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.