Differentiation Of Mission Between Different Institutional Types
Author(s):
Michael Hannon (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES G 08, Future of Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-203
Chair:
Geert Thyssen

Contribution

This research will address a gap in the literature in relation to the lack of information “available on the actual diversity of institutional missions and profiles in the various national higher education systems in Europe other than that provided in a formal, often legal sense.” (VanVught 2009, p.19). This research will specifically focus on the binary system of higher education in Ireland, concentrating on universities and non-university institutions (Institutes of Technology [IoTs]).  

 

A binary system of higher education is in existence in Ireland since the second half of the 20th century, consisting of Regional Technical Colleges (now Institutes of Technology) and Universities. Over the years there was a blurring of boundaries in relation to differentiation of mission, with the universities guilty of vocational drift and the IoTs pursuing academic drift to such an extent that it is now difficult to identify to what extent diversity exists within or between the two institutional types.

 

The Irish government adopted as policy the National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030 (Hunt 2011, p.23), which states in recommendation number 19: “A framework should be developed to facilitate system-wide collaboration between diverse institutions.” and recommendation number 20: “The institute of technology sector should commence a process of evolution and consolidation; amalgamated institutions reaching the appropriate scale and capacity could potentially be re-designated.”

 

The incentive to become a Technological University has IoTs collaborating and forming alliances, willing to abandon / refocus their founding mission in pursuit of a status they may be incapable of obtaining due to rigorous criteria set by the traditional universities, criteria that have a research focus and do not recognise the multidimensional profile and third mission focus evident within the Institutes of Technology.

 

This research is necessary in order to determine the extent to which there is convergence or divergence in the profile and institutional missions of the Institutes of Technology, compared to the university sector in Ireland and the non-university sector in select countries in Europe. The Institutes of Technology are relatively young institutions (approximately forty years old), but have recently undergone a significant name change from Regional Technical Colleges in 1997/98. All are now interested in a further name change to a Technological University, but it is not clear how the profile and mission of this new entity will differ from the existing institutions, and whether or not there will be gaps in the provision of vocational education as a consequence of this re-designation.

This research will be a combination of the theory/practice interpretative model and the empirical model due to the proposed range of inquiry and research methods to be employed.

The research will be based on the theory of Diversity in Higher Education and will draw on literature relevant to this area in addition to literature and theories on governance in higher education; mergers; higher education policy; organisational theory related to organisational identity and identification.

Method

A comparative analysis of the strategic plans and institution responses to the Higher Education Authority ((HEA) 2012) Landscapes document will be conducted for the seven universities and the fourteen institutes of technology in Ireland. A balanced scorecard framework based on diversity indices will be devised and used in the comparative analysis. The twenty-one mission statements will be reviewed anonymously by key stakeholders in GMIT to determine ease of classification into missions of the university and non-university camps. The findings will be critiqued against a comparative analysis of the higher education systems in Norway and the Netherlands as each of these countries operate a binary HE system.

Expected Outcomes

It is expected that this research will: • Add to the body of knowledge in relation to a greater understanding of diversity and differentiation of national higher education systems, with a particular focus on the Irish higher education system. • Identify the extent to which there is evidence of convergence or divergence in the context of institutional profile and mission, both within and across institutional types in Ireland. • Benchmark mission diversity and differentiation in Ireland against two European countries also with a binary system of higher education.

References

(HEA), H. E. A. (2012). Towards a Future Higher Education Landscape. Hunt, C. (2011). National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030. VanVught, F. A., Ed. (2009). Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. Towards a European Classification of Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, Springer.

Author Information

Michael Hannon (presenting / submitting)
Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Registrar / Academic Affairs
Galway

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.