Building Capacity: How Teachers Perceive Professional Development
Author(s):
Margaret Baguley (presenting / submitting) Martin Kerby (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 08 B, Language, Reading and Power in the Classroom

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-12
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-202
Chair:
Anthony Malone
Discussant:
Eduardo Garcia

Contribution

Teachers’ views of professional development are increasingly problematised by two quite distinct and opposing perceptions. Although teachers recognise the value of continuing professional dialogue they are also disenchanted with what they see as irrelevant and ill-conceived efforts to bridge the divide between theory and their daily teacher practice in the classroom. A means of bridging this divide between the perceived ‘ivory tower’ (university) and the ‘chalkface’ (school) is to draw on the expertise of both in order to deliver mutually beneficial outcomes. The range of experience and expertise from educators in both the school and university sectors can be strategically utilised to provide targeted professional development opportunities.  These can also be designed to maximise the logistical connection between teachers in training at university who undertake their practical experiences in schools during their program of study. This paper seeks to examine the potential for collaboration between the school and university sectors with a specific focus on the area of teacher expectations regarding professional development in order to enhance their capacities.

An increasing emphasis globally on quality and accountability, driven by public demand, has had a direct impact on the way professional development is viewed in both the university and school sector. The OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) argued that teacher professional development has a direct impact on teaching quality and subsequently student achievement (OECD, 2010). Australia ranked third in the highest percentage of teachers from countries who had experienced professional development prior to the survey. The TALIS survey provides valuable information regarding European and international initiatives to improving the quality of teachers and teaching. There are a number of recent initiatives which have affected educational generally and particularly universities and schools in the context of this paper. In 2011 the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) released A background paper to inform the development of a national professional development framework for teachers and school leaders (Timperley, 2011). Earlier in 2011 AITSL also released the National Professional Standards for Teachers which “make explicit the elements of high-quality, effective teaching in 21st century schools and provides a framework that makes explicit the knowledge, practice and professional engagement required across teachers’ careers” (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011), echoing Dewey’s (1963, p. 24) contention that “everything depends on the quality of the experience.”

Professional development activities are often aligned with the strategic goals of the respective sector and participants who have individually chosen activities are expected to demonstrate their relevance to their career. Creating capacity amongst participants through professional development also empowers a person to face change and uncertainty, which is an important goal of education (James, 2008). Relevant and authentic professional development enhances capacity through various aspects such as supportive networking, the acquisition of new knowledge and expertise, the opportunity to pursue an area of interest and the ability to design, implement and evaluate a project.

Method

This research has utilised case study methodology to investigate the perceptions of teachers towards professional development in a single school site which is part of a bounded system. Cohen, Manion and Morrison (2007, p. 253) contend that case study provides “a unique example of real people in real situations, enabling readers to understand ideas more clearly than simply by presenting them with abstract theories or principles.” The participants completed an online survey and engaged in a focus group discussion related to the topic under investigation. The transcript of the interview was independently analysed by the researchers with a number of codes being identified. The researchers separated different segments of the data and labelled these through categories which underwent continual refinement and abstraction so they could identify themes in the coded data. Extracts of the interview have been narratively presented and include interpretations by the researchers, one of whom is currently teaching in a school and the other at the university. This dual perspective from the school-university link provided important insights and as Lincoln and Guba (1985, p. 359) contend provided an opportunity to build on the tacit knowledge that the writer (and the reader) bring to the final report.

Expected Outcomes

The two themes that emerged from the survey and focus group interview were that professional development is worthwhile and effective professional development contains a substantial practical element. The participants believed that professional development is worthwhile in spite of their mixed experience with it in terms of relevance and cost effectiveness. There was a view that internal professional development was more relevant and external experiences were always influenced by issues of cost, timing, relevance and awareness. The participants revealed that the worth of a professional development experience is measured by the extent to which participants are provided with information or skills which are immediately transferable to their classroom setting.

References

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/ Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). Florence, KY, USA: Routledge. Dewey, J., (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan. James, A. (2008). Student Teacher Professional Development for the 21st Century. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. Vol. 8, pp. 38 – 45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. OECD, (2010). Teachers’ Professional Development: Europe in international comparison. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/schooleducation/development_en.htm Timperley, H. (Oct, 2011). A background paper to inform the development of a national professional development framework for teachers and school leaders. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL), pp. 1 - 26.

Author Information

Margaret Baguley (presenting / submitting)
University of Southern Queensland
Springfield Central
Martin Kerby (presenting)
University of Southern Queensland
Faculty of Arts
Brisbane

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.