No paradigm change in sight – The history of professionalisation of Teachers in Austria
Author(s):
Daniela Leitner (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 03, Teachers' Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-09
11:00-12:30
Room:
A-103
Chair:
Ozge Hacifazlioglu

Contribution

The proposal deals with the history of the teaching profession in Austria under the perspective of professionalisation processes. The author focuses on the question of how the Austrian teaching profession developed over the past two hundred years by using various historical sources (e.g. legal texts, journals, newspapers, policy documents, proceedings of teachers associations etc.). A further question deals with specific milestones representing the above mentioned development. The background of this development is highlighted under the perspective of a structural theory-based professionalisation theory (cf. Oevermann 1996, Oevermann 2008). This historical approach to the research topic contributes to understanding the teachers and their role inside the Austrian school system today and the current debate which underpins the reforms of teacher education planned in Austria.

Until the end of the 18th century teacher education in Austria was primarily organised by the (Catholic) church and the church was the unique supervisor. In an Act in 1770 it was pronounced that the school system was a state issue and not under the responsibility of the church. Through this Act and by introducing mandatory primary education in 1774, the Emperor Maria Theresia set the first step for introducing a new profession: the teaching profession.

The main thesis is that the foundation of the teaching profession in Austria was laid by Maria Theresia in the 18th century by introducing compulsory education but was then, more and longer than in other European countries – actually until today – subject to political interests.

The following various milestones (e.g. book of methodology in 1775, “Reichsgesetzblatt” in 1849, “Reichsvolksschulgesetz” in 1869, “Schulorganisationsgesetz” in 1962 etc.) which influenced possible professionalisation processes will be considered. The tendencies leading to a teaching profession together with the social and political counter movements will be examined with the intention to reveal the possible reasons why teachers in Austria until today have difficulties with considering themselves as a profession or at least – if they consider themselves as professionals – are not accepted as such neither by the public nor by the government.

Against this background the paper intends to discuss the historical roots of professionalism or its failure to fully develop on the basis of the Austrian example and tries to shed light on the social and cultural environments which contribute to support or hamper professional development.

Method

In terms of methodology the aim of this paper is to discuss political developments referring to the governance and regulation of (initial) teacher education in Austria. A particular focus is put on the milestones of professionalisation in the pre-service teacher education on the basis of source studies. In Austria there are two main institutions of pre-service teacher education. There are so called colleges of teacher education and universities. Both institutions, however, have different traditions. An analysis and a presentation of a selection of historic sources (e.g. legal texts, policy papers etc.) representing milestones of professionalisation will be at the center of attention.

Expected Outcomes

While grammar school teachers in Austria needed a university degree in order to be allowed to work as teachers since the mid-19th century (1849/1856) – due to dislocation of teacher education for grammar school teachers at universities and reorganisation of the secondary school system and the universities by the former minister of education, count Leo Thun-Hohenstein –, the qualification of a bachelor’s degree at the college for teacher’s education for primary teachers was introduced not before 2007. An analysis of the teaching profession throughout history reveals that teachers in Austria have a special position with exceptional conditions. Teachers’ rights have long been argued between the political parties and various other establishments (e.g. state, Catholic church). Teachers in Austria still have special rights compared to other European countries. This paper intends to contribute to the current debate about the planned reforms of teacher education in Austria. These significant reforms are likely to bring about a fundamental change in the landscape of Austrian teacher education. However, as the dynamics over the past two hundred years have shown, their success might be at high risk if the traditional structures do not undergo dramatic change.

References

Buchberger, Friedrich/Seel, Helmut (1999): Teacher Education in Austria: Description, Analysis and Perspectives. In: TNTEE Publications Vol. 2, Nr. 2, 11-42. Combe, Arno/Helsper, Werner (1996) (ed.): Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Engelbrecht, Helmut (1982-95): Geschichte des österreichischen Bildungswesens, 5 Bände. Wien: öbv. Enzelberger, Sabina (2001): Sozialgeschichte des Lehrerberufs. Gesellschaftliche Stellung und Professionalisierung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Weinheim-München: Juventa. Gassner, Otmar/Schratz, Michael (2000): Austrian teacher education systems. In: Paiva-Campos, Bartoló (ed.). Teacher education policies in the European Union. Lisbon: INAFOP, 127-136. Leitner, Daniela (2013) (in press): Kein Paradigmenwechsel in Sicht – Zur Professionalisierungsgeschichte des Lehrerberufs in Österreich. Oevermann, Ulrich (1996): Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns. In: Combe, Arno; Helsper, Werner (ed.): Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Oevermann, Ulrich (2008): Profession contra Organisation? Strukturtheoretische Perspektiven zum Verhältnis von Organisation und Profession in der Schule. In: Helsper, Werner/ Busse, Susanne/ Hummrich, Merle/ Kramer, Rolf-Torsten (ed.): Pädagogische Professionalität in Organisationen. Neue Verhältnisbestimmungen am Beispiel der Schule. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 55 – 77. Schratz, Michael/Paseka, Angelika/Schrittesser, Ilse (2011) (ed.): Pädagogische Professionalität: querdenken – umdenken – neudenken. Impulse für next practice im Lehrerberuf. Wien: wuvfacultas. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga/Beck, Klaus/Sembill, Detlef/Nickolaus, Reinhold/Mulder, Regina (2009) (ed.): Lehrprofessionalität. Bedinungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, Weinheim-Basel: Beltz.

Author Information

Daniela Leitner (presenting / submitting)
University of Innsbruck
Department of Teacher Education and School research
Innsbruck

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.