Quality of Workplace Learning: What Makes a Workplace a Good Learning Venue? The perspective of apprentices.
Author(s):
Christof Nägele (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 04 B, Perspectives on Learning at the Workplace - Employers, Training Providers, Apprentices

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
09:00-10:30
Room:
A-103
Chair:
Barbara Elisabeth Stalder

Contribution

This paper first presents how apprentices and students evaluate their workplace, respectively their school as learning venue. Do they have think that they can acquire knowledge and skills and that they can develop professional attitudes? The main focus of the paper is then to name all the antecedents of a positive evaluation of the workplace as learning place by the apprentices.   

The majority of adolescents in Switzerland attends an apprenticeship on the upper secondary level and only one fifth goes trough an general academic education  (Bundesamt für Berufsbildung und Technologie, 2011). Whereas apprentices are educated and trained at three distinct learning venues (company, inter-company courses, vocational school), students are educated and trained at their school or gymnasium. Results show that apprentices and students evaluate their school as learning venue very much in the same way. However, apprentices tell us that their workplace is a much better place to learn than their vocational school. 

This is a positive result for the companies, as learning at the workplace  is a crucial and central element in the education and training of adolescents at the upper secondary level  (Stalder & Nägele, 2011). 

Workplace training relies on authentic work. The apprentices learn by doing real work in a real context. It is a big challenge for every company not only to keep the apprentices busy, but also to teach and educate them and to help them to become expert workers.

Individual, social, organizational and structural factors will be discussed that help to explain the overall very positive evaluation of the workplace as a learning venue. Basically, the learning opportunities depend on the concrete job activities, the instruction an apprentice receives, how the trainer and experienced co-workers interact with the apprentice and how they coach him. Other important factors are also the location of learning, the extent of planning that has been invested in delivering the training and the role of the trainer and others during the learning process (Jacobs & Park, 2009), or the work task and working conditions, especially the amount of cognitive regulation that is needed to do the task (Hacker, 2005). Optimal workplace learning is embedded in a situation where there is support from the supervisor, an adequate workload, and the opportunity to use the new competences (Russ-Eft, 2002). 

As predictors of the learning opportunities the paper will discuss the effects of the following factors: The social environment (e.g., the interest of significant others), the Characteristics of the apprentice (e.g., a positive self-esteem and self-efficacy), the learning style of the apprentice, the pedagogical and didactical skills of the workplace trainer as well as the skills of the teachers, the job design at the workplace and at school (e.g, scope of action) and is able to regulate his work in a stress-free manner and finally the transfer of knowledge and skills between the vocational school and the workplace.   

Method

This paper discusses the assessment of the learning opportunities in the company by the apprentices in their first, second and third year of their apprenticeship. Data is taken from the Swiss youth survey TREE, which is based on the Swiss PISA sample tested in the year 2000. The participants have been followed up annually until 2007 and with an additional survey in 2010. The initial sample counted over 5,000 young people representative of an entire Swiss grade 9 school-leavers’ cohort. Each year, the young people described their current educational situation, reported significant events in their educational pathway and specified their occupation, school or company.

Expected Outcomes

We see a very positive and stable evaluation of the learning opportunities at the workplace by the apprentices. What is learnt at the workplace is relevant for the practice and day-by-day work shows that knowledge and these skills are relevant. The stability means that apprentices starting with good learning opportunities in their first year have a relatively high chance that this situation stays unchanged in the second and third year of their apprenticeship. As expected, the workplace trainer plays an important role in a positive evaluation of the workplace as learning venue. Second, the transfer between the vocational school and the company is important. Third, the job design is important: scope of action and having something to do. Conclusions from this paper for a further improvement of workplace learning could be a further professionalization of the workplace trainer, especially with an emphasis to focus on integrating school based academic knowledge into the daily work in the company. And trainer should help to design jobs such that apprentices have a positive scope of action and that they are confronted with tasks in which they can use their knowledge, skills and abilities.

References

Bundesamt für Berufsbildung und Technologie. (2011). Berufsbildung in der Schweiz. Fakten und Zahlen [Facts and figures. Vocational and professional education and training in Switzerland]. Bern, CH: Bundesamt für Berufsbildung und Technologie BBT. Hacker, W. (2005). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Wissens-, Denk- und körperlicher Arbeit. Bern, CH: Verlag Hans Huber. Jacobs, R. L., & Park, Y. (2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning: Implications for theory development and research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 8(2), 133. doi:10.1177/1534484309334269 Russ-Eft, D. (2002). A typology of training design and work environment factors affecting workplace learning and transfer. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 45-65. doi:10.1177/1534484302011003 Stalder, B. E., & Nägele, C. (2011). Vocational education and training in Switzerland: Organisation, development and challenges for the future. In M. M. Bergman, S. Hupka-Brunner, A. Keller, T. Meyer, & B. E. Stalder (Eds.), Youth transitions in Switzerland: Results from the TREE panel study. (pp. 18-39). Zürich, CH: Seismo Verlag

Author Information

Christof Nägele (presenting / submitting)
School for Teacher Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland
Research Dr.Center for Learning and Socialization
Solothurn

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.