Session Information
10 SES 07 D, Motivation, Inclusion, Self-Efficacy
Paper Session
Contribution
Teacher education is an active area blamed to inadequate impact on teachers’ practices. Hence, it is agreed that traditional teacher education programs need a change in a way that helps pre-service teachers to be familiar with real and good classroom practices (Roblin& Margalef, 2012). Samuels and Bets (2007) argued that self-assessment is a way to orient teachers to understand good practice. Besides that self-assessment is also an effective procedure which allows the learners are aware of their strengths and weaknesses of their learning process (Hodgson& Pyle, 2010). Additionally, self-assessment also provides more qualified dialogue between learners and instructors because learners have detail information about educational goals (Orsmond, et al., 2000). Researchers argued that self-assessment should also be relevant to learners’ judgments of themselves about their capacity to do a task (Coronado-Aliegro, 2007). Person’s answers to the question of “Can I do this task”, in other words judgments of oneself to do a task refer to person’s self-efficacy beliefs (e.g. Pintrich& Schunk, 2002). Different from outcome expectations, self-efficacy beliefs include people’s feelings and emotions for a coming situation (e.g. Bandura, 1977). In brief, learners’ perceptions about how well they organize required activities for an unclear situation, refers to people’s self-efficacy beliefs (e.g. Bandura, 1977). For this reason, self-efficacy directly effects people’s decisions about whether do they engage in the coming activity, and if they engage, how much effort will they show to complete the task (e.g.Bandura, 1977). According to the some researchers; self-assessment procedure is one of the factors that affect students’ self-efficacy (Olina & Sullivan, 2002; Coronado-Aliegro, 2007; Alaba Adeyemi, 2012). On the other hand, some researchers suggest no relationship between self-efficacy and self-assessment (Cassidy, 2007). Despite all, research on self-assessment and self-efficacy are scarcely available (Cassidy, 2007). Through the mentioned literature above, the present study aims to investigate the relationship between self-assessment and teaching science efficacy in pre-service science teachers. In this study therefore, the following research questions will be asked:
- Is there a relationship between self-assessment and teaching science self-efficacy in pre-service science teachers?
- What do pre-service science teachers think about the effect of self-assessment procedure on their teaching efficacy beliefs?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alaba Adeyemi, A. (2012). Effect of Peer and Self-Assessment on Male and Female Students’ Self-Efficacy and Self-Autonomy in the Learning of Mathematics. Gender & Behaviour, 10(1), 4492-4508. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191–215. Cassidy, S. (2007). Assessing 'inexperienced' students' ability to self-assess: Exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 313-330. Coronado-Aliegro, J. (2007). Enhancing learner self-efficacy through continuous self-assessment: Implications for the foreign language classroom. In A. J. Moeller (Ed.), 2007 Report of the Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (pp. 127-141). Milwaukee, WI: RMT. EFCATS (European Federation of Catalysis Societies) Checklist for analysing oral presentation Retrieved, October 30, 2012 from http://efcats.org/Give+Successful+Presentations/Checklist+for+Analyzing+Oral+Presentations.html Lowry, A. (2010). Effective Presenting Workshop lecture notes (DIFP 02-09/08/2010) Natalie Pareja Roblin & Leonor Margalef (2012). Learning from dilemmas: teacher professional development through collaborative action and reflection, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,19 (1), 1-15. Olina, Z. & Sullivan, H.J. (2002). Effects of teacher and self-assessment on student performance. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, April 1-5, 2002, New Orleans, LA. Ormand, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of students derived making criteria in peer-and self- assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (1), 23- 39. Özkan, Ö., Tekkaya, C. & Çakıroğlu, J. (2002). Fen bilgisi aday öğretmenlerin fen kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri, fen öğretimine yönelik tutum ve öz yeterlik inançları, V. Fen ve Matematik Kongresi, Ankara. Printrich, P.,,R.& Schunk, D., H. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research and applications. Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall. Samuels, M. and Betts, J. (2007), Crossing the threshold from description to deconstruction and reconstruction: using self -assessment to deepen reflection, Reflective Practice, 8 (2), 269-283.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.