Joint Observation of Student Teachers During Placement: Partner Perspectives
Author(s):
Peter Mtika (submitting) Dean Robson (presenting) Roseanne Fitzpatrick
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 03 C, Placements in Teacher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-10
17:15-18:45
Room:
A-203
Chair:
Jae Major
Discussant:
Dean Robson

Contribution

Teacher preparation is essentially a partnership activity involving schools and universities (Smith et al., 2006; Sivan & Chan, 2009). However, global research has consistently shown that there is a divide between university and schools, a disconnect attributed to the fact that schools and university which are expected to be partners in teacher preparation operate in dissimilar settings (Feiman-Nemser & Buchmann, 1985; Cope & Stephen, 2001; Zeichner, 2010). Moving between these settings can create tensions for student teachers, including anxiety towards school-based assessment (Mtika, 2008) and may hinder the development of a sense of belonging (Johnston, 2010). It is suggested that enhanced collaborative partnership structures may lessen the psychosocial and professional tensions felt by student teachers, whilst bridging the gap between their school and university experiences, and support professional development (Anagnostopoulos et al., 2007; Zeichner, 2010).

In this study which was part of a larger Placement Partnership Project (PPP), joint observation by teachers and teacher educators is viewed as one of the necessary structures to support collaborative partnership and to counter the complexity of the school–university divide (Barab & Duffy, 2000). Partnership-based joint observation may also “facilitate the growth of reflexivity” (Gopinathan et al., 2008) for all partners. It has been suggested that [joint] observation is more effective when carried out in a manner that promotes dialogue (O’Leary, 2012) and this may in turn promote self-reflection among the partners involved. Equally, it can also stimulate simultaneous renewal among the teacher educators and school teachers involved whereby they both experience professional growth through reflection and co-learning processes (O’Leary, 2012).

This research explores joint observation activity, centred on the placement teaching period of a cohort of third and fourth year students on a four year B. Ed (Primary) programme. The research question explored is: What are the experiences and views of all those engaged in joint observation of student teacher practice, as part of a tripartite partnership?

Method

The research examines the implementation of tripartite partnership-based joint observation of student teaching practice from the interconnected, multiple perspectives of student teachers, supporter teachers and teacher educators. The study is focussed on a 14 week teaching practice period. For specific exploration of the experiences of joint observation for all partner groups, data were collected using a semi-structured interview approach. The qualitative nature of this approach ensured a depth of data whilst at the same time, allowed the rich individuality of participants’ thoughts, experiences and meanings to be given appropriate space (Silverman, 2005). Interview data were collected from 14 third and fourth year student teachers, 15 supporter teachers and 14 tutors (university-based teacher educators). Interviews were conducted at the completion of teaching practice by members of staff who were not involved in the supervision and assessment of student teachers, ensuring that the process was methodologically more trustworthy (Lankshear & Knobel, 2004). The research was implemented in line with current British Educational Research Association ethical guidelines.

Expected Outcomes

It was envisaged that the research would provide evidence to influence the development of effective operational frameworks for joint observation of benefit to all participants. The findings pointed to tripartite joint observation providing opportunities to gain more holistic understandings of student teaching, to scaffold learning in a more robust fashion, to assess the consistency of support, and to generally enhance school-university partnership. The findings further suggest that joint observation may be better implemented in a flexible fashion, rather than following a one-size-fits-all model. The continuing existence of a cultural clash within the school-university partnership has been exposed, and challenges for staffing joint observation activity highlighted. These findings reinforced the view that teachers and teacher educators play significant roles in the professional learning of student teachers. The findings align with work suggesting joint observation is essential because it values horizontal expertise (Anagnostopoulos et al., 2007), non-hierarchical knowledge systems (Zeichner, 2010), a greater role for the university tutors (Slick, 1998), and greater involvement of teachers in teacher preparation (Cope & Stephen, 2001). Dialogue between teacher educators, student teachers, and school teachers through the medium of CPD needs to be recognised and harnessed to enable the epistemic and pedagogic development of all partners.

References

Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E.R., & Basmadjian, K.G. (2007). Bridging the university-school divide - Horizontal expertise and the "two-worlds pitfall. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 138-152. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-56). New York: Routledge. Cope, P., & Stephen, C. (2001). A role for practising teachers in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2001), 913-924. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 87(1), 53-65. Gopinathan, S., Tan, S., Yanping, F., Devi, L., Ramos, C., & Chao, E. (2008). Transforming Teacher Education: Redefined Professionals for 21st Century Schools. A report commissioned by the international alliance of leading education institutes. Singapore: National Institute of Education. Johnston, D.H. (2010). ‘Losing the joy’: student teachers’ experiences of problematic relations with host teachers on school placement. Teacher Development: An international Journal of Teachers' Professional Development, 14(3), 307-320. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). Teacher research: from design to implementation. Maidenhead: Open University Press. O’Leary, M. (2012). Exploring the role of lesson observation in the English education system: a review of methods, models and meanings. Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 791–810. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage. Slick, S. (1998). The university supervisor: a disenfranchised outsider. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 821–834. Smith, I., Brisard, E., & Menter, I. (2006). Models of partnership development in initial teacher education in the four components of the United Kingdom: recent trends and current challenges. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(2), 147–164. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 61-89.

Author Information

Peter Mtika (submitting)
University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Dean Robson (presenting)
University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.