Critical Reflection in Science Teaching and Learning: a creative approach to the introduction to teaching practice
Author(s):
Angela Rickard (presenting / submitting) Majella V Dempsey
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 05 A, Becoming, Dwelling, Reflecting

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-11
11:00-12:30
Room:
A-201
Chair:
Angela Rickard
Discussant:
Snefrid Tislevoll

Contribution

The module described and evaluated in this paper arose from a concern to find creative ways to enable student teachers to deepen their personal practical knowledge of the teaching process and to help them develop agency and openness to the critique of their own and others’ practice.  Practical and experiential in design, the model uses video as one medium among others to give students the opportunity to encounter their own nascent personae as teachers. Working in teams the process set out to create a ‘safe-place’ for them to encounter reciprocal peer-observation (Gosling 2002) and cultivate among them positive dispositions in relation to collaborative practice for future their professional and pedagogical settings.

That student teachers need opportunities for discussion that probes their personal and practical knowledge landscapes (Clandinin & Connelly, 2000) is widely accepted. Finding ways to enable them appreciate the complexities involved in teaching and learning is less obvious. According to Schuck et al (2008) processes to support this should include at least the following: a willingness to take risks, a respect for another’s expertise in teaching and an ability to reflect collaboratively on teaching and learning. Schuck and her colleagues also discuss how intensely personal professional learning is for teachers: opening our practice up to others provides insight into our teaching personae as well as our teaching practices (Schuck et al. 2008: 225). The Learning to Teach Study (LETS) report reminds us that teachers“come into teaching with well-formed initial teacher identities, teacher education involves re-negotiation of those cultural scripts” (Conway et al. 2011:  29). Such re-negotiation is a difficult and complex task. An increasingly popular way to foster critical reflection and self- as well as peer-analysis of teaching is through the affordances of video technology (Rickard et al.  2009, Harford and MacRuaric 2008).

Initiated in Autumn 2011 and entitled CRiSTaL (Critical Reflection in Science Teaching and Learning) the initiative developed to address these concerns was introduced into the second year undergraduate BSc Science Education programme in our institution in advance of beginning student teachers undertaking their first teaching practice placement.  It coincided with their initial period of observation in schools. Our aim was to position them to reflect on the teaching they would see in these contexts, to experience working closely with each other at an early stage in their development as teachers and also to enable them to engage directly in the planning and delivering stimulating and engaging lessons of a student-centred collaborative kind. 

Student teachers’ conceptualisation of teaching and their reflection on collaboration in teaching and learning needs to happen in the university context before it is possible to explore it in the classroom level. This engagement is about both absorbing and being absorbed in a culture of practice (Lave and Wenger 1991).

Method

The methodology consisted of a reflection on the process designed for and undertaken by the students and rolled out over a 12 week period in the first semester in 2001/12 and 2012/13. This centred around students working in four member teams to plan, deliver and reflect on short lessons based on the second level curriculum and role-played to their peers. Following the students’ first cycle of collaborative lesson planning, team-teaching, video-recording, discussion/analysis, presentation and reflection detailed feedback from other students’ critical observations and discussions was conveyed to the student teams prior to them undertaking a second cycle where roles in teams were rotated and the process re-enacted informed by the critique and reflections from the first five to six weeks work. . Our findings are based data gathered at key points in this process for the first two iterations of the module. These include video recordings, questionnaires and focus group discussions with the participating student teachers from two cohorts (equal numbers in both years and 64 students in total). We will also draw on our own reflections, observations, critical conversations to support the tentative claims we make concerning the effectiveness of this module.

Expected Outcomes

Although data analysis is as yet incomplete we can attest to the success of the model in terms of students’ openness to engaging in and reflecting on their practice. Although students’ initial reactions to the process were dominated by feelings of fear and apprehension about both working in teams and about teaching ‘in front of their peers’ such feelings gave way to overwhelmingly positive testimonials of increased confidence in both respects. The evidence suggests that students have developed greater flexibility, openness and willingness to engage in professional conversations, to begin to develop the vocabulary needed to participate in professional learning communities and to demonstrate the creative capacities that show promise for dynamic and student centred teaching approaches.

References

Clandinin, D. J. and Connelly, F. M., (2000) Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Conway, P.F., Murphy, R., Delargey, M., Hall, K., Kitching, K., Long, F., McKeon, J., Murphy, B., O’Brien, S., O’Sullivan, D. (2011). Learning to Teach Study (LETS): Developing curricular and cross-curricular competencies in becoming a ‘good’ secondary teacher: Executive Summary. Cork: UCC. Harford, J. and MacRuairc, G. (2008) 'Engaging Student Teachers in Meaningful Reflective Practice'. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Teaching and Studies, 24: 1884-1892. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rickard, A., Quirke-Bolt, N. & McAvinia, C. (2009) The Challenge of Change: Digital video-analysis and constructivist learning approaches on a one year pre-service teacher education programme in Ireland. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 349-368. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., & Buchanan, J. (2008). Enhancing teacher education through professional learning conversations. European Journal of Teacher Education. 31(2), 215-227.

Author Information

Angela Rickard (presenting / submitting)
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Education
Maynooth
National University of Ireland Maynooth
Education Department
County Kildare

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.