Session Information
26 SES 04 B, Principal Programs and Leadership Development
Paper Session
Contribution
This paper contributes in debates of ways of measuring quality and effects from investments in school leadership education and development. The background for this interest is that most studies of effects from leadership education and development are measuring only if the participants are satisfied (Kirkpatrick 1998; Watkins et al. 2011). There is a need for studies measuring the effects on several levels; experience of learning, impact on the school organization, and the results when it comes to improvement in pupils learning. The purpose of the paper is to explore how the Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) (Marsick & Watkins, 2003) and the Norwegian Principal Self-Efficacy Scale (NPSES) (Federici & Skaalvik, 2011) can be employed to measure change from school leadership education and development. The relationship between experience of change at the individual and organizational level after participation in programs of leadership education and development will be discussed.
Learning culture is a concept that reflects organizational behavior from the perspective of learning and development (Watkins & Marsick, 1997). Watkins and Marsick developed a theory called organizational learning, which defines seven dimensions that are important in promoting on-going change and learning in a culture (Marsick & Watkins, 2003). Principal self-efficacy reflects a kind of leadership self-efficacy which is associated with a certain level of confidence in one’s own knowledge, skills and abilities in association with leading others (Hannah et al. 2008). In the present study, principal self-efficacy is defined as the principals’ judgments of their capabilities to plan, organize and execute tasks and deal with their relationship to people and institutions in their environment (Federici & Skaalvik 2011).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 669-692. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007 Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2011). Principal self-efficacy and work engagement: Assessing a Norwegian Principal Self-Efficacy Scale. Social Psychology of Education, 14(4), 575-600. doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9160-4 Kirkpatrick, D. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: the Four Level (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997). Dimensions of learning organization (DLOQ). Warwick, RI: Partners for the Learning Organization. Watkins, K. E., Lyso, I. H. & deMarris, K. (2011). Evaluating Executive Leadership Development: A Theory of Change Approach. Advances in Developing Human Resources. DOI: 10.1177/1523422311415643
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.