The Emancipation of Communicative Competence in the Process of Argumentation
Author(s):
Nijole Ciuciulkiene (presenting / submitting) Nijole Bankauskiene
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Poster

Session Information

27 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2013-09-11
12:30-14:00
Room:
FUAYE
Chair:

Contribution

 

The 21st century education might be characterized as interactive, cooperative, collaborative, inter – disciplinary process with clear priorities of competent usage of modern technologies, development of problem solving skills, abilities to evaluate learning needs and outcomes. Such characteristics highlight the active functioning of interactive education paradigm (Augustiniene, Ciuciulkiene, 2012) in all stages and forms of educational institutions.

Until recently education and especially the secondary education was organized according the needs of particular states. Today the attitude has totally changed. The development of mobility and labor market transformed the idea of the “closed national school” into the “open” institution, which strives to equip the young people with the tools helping them “to become integrated to the fullest possible extent in a society (Čiučiulkienė, 2004.). Integration to the fullest possible extent in a society is impossible without successful communication in a native and in a foreign languages. Moreover, while following Pink‘s (2005) ideas of future Conceptual Age it is obligatory to mention that „the essence of persuasion, communication, and self-understanding has become the ability also to fashion a compelling narrative” (p. 66). P. Descy ir M. Tessaring, (2001), on their turn, also highlight communication of high quality as the main competence of the XXI century specialist. Communication in a native tongue enhances ability to express and interpret phenomena of social reality orally and in written form. Communication in a foreign language is defined as the ability to understand the speaker, to support a conversation, to read and understand texts, while pointing out specific social aspects and cultural differences, to express personal feelings and attitudes, facts of life orally and in written form (2005). The latter elements of communicative competence definition such as pointing out specific social aspects and cultural differences, expression of personal feelings and attitudes implies the importance of the development of argumentative competence.

Learning is made especially attractive when students face a problem, and their responsibility is to solve this problem. Problem solving process is impossible without argumentation. The typology and structure of the arguments imply the vast range of language learning possibilities and methods, starting with the expansion of a simple sentence into an argumented one and finishing with argumentative reasoning in modern debates. For this reason the paradigm of argumentative reasoning is getting more and more important in teaching and learning of a foreign language.

According the research data of foreign language popularity in Lithuania, English may be defined as a Lingua Franca in Lithuania and functions for communicative purposes alongside with the native Lithuanian tongue.

Method

•Analysis of scientific literature. It provides a possibility to analyze such concepts as “communication“, “competence“, “communicative competence“; oral verbal communication“, “argumentation“, “argumentative competence“, the formation of the argumentative competence model, that would enable the development of verbal communication skils while speaking English. •Observation and interview. These methods reveal pupils‘ contemporary attitude towards foreign language teaching and learning and their efforts to develop spoken English skills while developing argumentative competence. •Questionnaire survey of the open-ended questions was performed in order to manifest pupils‘ attitudes on their primary experience of argumentative reasoning and their new understanding of their learning process. •Content analysis of pupils’ presentations was carried out in order to perform the categorization of the expression of students’ experience which presents the final result – the development of spoken English skills while creating the argumentative discourse. •Reflection and self-reflection were used to diagnose pupils’ progress while developing spoken English skills with the help of argumentation techniques and methods. •Diary writing was applied as a narrative method revealing the research outcomes

Expected Outcomes

While comparing the amount of words that students used at the beginning of the research and after applying argumentation techniques, one can see the evident results that the capacity of the spoken text has expanded widely. At the beginning of the survey the average number of words used to answer the questions was>20 words, while after applying argumentation the spoken text expanded to approximately more than 60 words for each question. The length of the discourse has encreased approximately from free to even eight times.

References

1.Augustinienė, A., Bankauskienė, N. (2012). Mokymasis tyrinėjant ir argumentavimas pedagogo veiklos tobulinimo tyrime. S-TEAM projekto seminaro medžiaga. 2.Augustinienė, A., Bankauskienė, N., Čiučiulkienė, N. (2011). Argumentative competence: how to develop it? S-TEAM Project seminar materials. 3.Augustinienė, A., Bankauskienė, N., Čiučiulkienė, N. (2012). Mokomės pagrįsti ir įrodyti. Kaunas: Technologija. 4.Augustinienė, A., Čiučiulkienė, N., Bankauskienė, N., New Teachers’ Roles in the Development of Pupils’Career Decision Making and Communication Skills. In Scientific Works “Teacher Training”. Nr. 5, 65—74, (2005, in Lithuanian). 5.Čiučiulkienė, N. PBL as Oral Communication in English Emancipating Process. Doctoral Disseration, Kaunas: Technologija, (2004, in Lithuanian). 6.Descy, P., Tessaring, M. (2001).Training ad learning for competence. Second report on vocation training research in Europe: synthesis report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 7.McBeath, N. (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Language; learning, teaching, assessment. Vol 2. Iss 1. p.186-213. 8.S-TEAM. Seventh Framework Programme Science-in-Society Project (2012).

Author Information

Nijole Ciuciulkiene (presenting / submitting)
Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania
Kaunas University of Technology
Faculty of Social Sciences
Kaunas

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.