Session Information
10 SES 04 B, Assessing Student Teachers
Paper Session
Contribution
It is not unusual to hear teacher students express that ideas about what is considered good teaching and learning are less decisive for good education than the question about what can be realistic aims for the education considering the given constrains surrounding it. Much of the same point of view can be found in an enquiry among teacher students carried out at one of the largest teacher educations in Norway (Klassekampen, 10. Marc 2010). This view can be seen as part of a neoliberal rationality where “the content and purpose of education become subject to the forces of the market instead of being the concern of professional judgment and democratic deliberation” (Biesta 2009: 31). A neoliberal rationality has had an impact on the language, discourse and practice of education throughout Europe over the past two decades, for example in documents on education by the European Commission (Biesta 2009, Aasen 2003).
The aim of this paper is to discuss the possibilities to strengthen a dialogical teaching in the teacher education. This approach harnesses the power of talk, to stimulate and extend teachers students thinking and advance their learning and understanding. The teacher students opinions about ideas and values as less decisive for good education than the question about what can be realistic aims, may affect important teacher qualities as critical attitude and creativity. Dialogic teaching emphasis the teacher as learner and relates to teaching across the curriculum and the teacher educator needs to relate to the teacher students opinions with curiosity, which is not always easy considering that ideas and values constitute the core of the teacher education (Alexander 2008).
The main question of concerning dialogical teaching in this the paper will therefor be: How can the teacher educator through dialogical teaching meet teacher student’s statements on good practice understood as mainly concerning pragmatic issues, linking the statements to a theoretical framework, and by this promoting the question what is good practice?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Biesta, G. J. J. (2009): Against learning. I: Biesta, G. J. J: Beyond Learning. Democratic Education for a Human Future. London: Paradigm Publisher. Alexander, R. J. (2006): Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos Alexander, R. J. (1992): Policy and Practice in Primary Education. London and New York: Routledge Aasen P. (2003): What Happened to Social-Democratic Progressivism in Scandinavia? Restructuring Education in Sweden and Norway in the 1990s. I: Apple, M. W. (red.). The State and the Politics of Knowledge. New York: Routledge Falmer. Klassekampen. Upraktiske lærarstudiar. Onsdag 10. mars 2010
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.