Session Information
16 SES 06, ICT in Pre-school
Paper Session
Contribution
In today’s digitalized society the potential of digital technologies and how to use these to support learning has increasingly become a focus of research. Since preschool children’s use of ICT is continuously increasing, more interest is also being paid to the question of how ICT can be used for pedagogical purposes in preschools, although research in this area is still limited (Sandvik, Smørdal & Østerud 2012). The use of ICT in preschools is itself a controversial matter. Earlier research has questioned whether young children should be subjected to ICT (Straker et al 2009; Kalas 2010). A growing number of studies, however, identify the potential of ICT as a tool for learning in preschools when the use of ICT is based on pedagogical principles and supports learning of an intended content (McCarrick & Li 2007; McKenney & Voogt 2009). In other words, if ICT is to be used to create a pedagogical added value in preschools, preschool teachers must develop an ability to integrate pedagogical knowledge, content knowledge and technological knowledge.
The aim of this study is to examine what kind of added pedagogical value pre-service preschool teachers think educational technologies can bring to preschools and to analyze their oral, written and practical digital examples and presentations of such added value through the lenses of the theoretical framework of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK).
Mishra and Koehler (2008) has built on Shulman’s (1986) pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to create a conceptual framework that also includes technological knowledge and the ability to successfully integrate this with their pedagogical knowledge and content knowledge. They label their conceptual framework Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). The TPACK framework has proven useful as a tool for describing the type of knowledge required by teachers for successful technology integration (Voogt et al 2012). A teacher that possesses TPACK knows how to successfully integrate ICT in their practice to create an added pedagogical value. Thus, looking for signs of TPACK means looking for signs of successful technology integration. Hence there are a number of studies that try to measure teachers’ or student teachers’ TPACK with the intention of identifying successful ICT integration (Angeli & Valanides 2009; Kramarski & Michalsky 2010). In this study the theoretical framework TPACK is used to analyze preschool teacher students’ oral presentations, written texts and digital examples of ICT use for added value in preschools.
The following research questions have been formulated:
- What types of arguments did the preschool teacher students present to support or questions the use of ICT to create added pedagogical value in preschools?
- What types of examples were given of successful ICT use for added pedagogical value in preschools by the preschool teacher students in their written documentation?
- To what extent do the preschool teacher students’ practical digital examples show signs of added pedagogical value by successful ICT integration (i.e. to what extent do the preschool teacher students’ digital examples show signs of TPACK or other subdomains in the TPACK framework)
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. Bowers, J. S., & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: a framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 285–304. Kalas, I. (2010). Recognizing the potential if ICT in early childhood education. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for information Technologies in Education. Kramarski, B. & Michalsky, T. (2010) Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction 20 (2010), 434-447 Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New York. Sandvik, M., Smørdal, O. & Østerud, S. (2012) Exploring iPads in Practitioners’ Repertoires for Language Learning and Literacy Practices in Kindergarten. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 7(3) McCarrick, K., & Xiaoming, L. (2007). Buried treasure: The impact of computer use on young children’s social, cognitive, language development and motivation, AACE Journal, 15(1), 73-95 McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2009). Designing technology for emergent literacy: The PictoPal initiative. Computers & Education, 52(4), 719–729. Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S. & Herrington, J. (2011) Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 2011, 27(1), 55-65 Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Straker, L., Pollock, C. & Maslen, B. (2009): Principles for the wise use of computers by children, Ergonomics, 52:11, 1386-1401 Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J. and van Braak, J. (2012). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.