The scientific interest for formative assessment practices is greatly increased in recent years because of research that has shown its effective use to improve students’ learning outcomes (Kingston & Nash, 2011; Bennett, 2011; Dunn & Mulvenon, 2009; Black & Wiliam, 2009; 1998). Formative assessment can be defined as all activities undertaken by teachers and students to gather information to be used diagnostically in order to modify teaching and learning: it works because it has a powerful effect on the two most important protagonists in the teaching-learning process (teachers and students). However, things appear different when the focus is posed on Higher Education.

The current trend in assessment seems to lose its strength when the focus is placed on the university student’s level of achievement. Current research interests in this area are mainly oriented towards identifying forms and models for assessing teaching-learning processes and to implement a controlled system assessment. The most common assessment practice is aimed to gathering students’ opinions about the teaching-learning services in the course of study. Starting from this assumptions, the present paper reports on the first step of a larger multiple case study conducted with the students of the School of Education at the University of Bari (Italy). It is focused on their representations and conceptions of formative assessment (and the practices of self and peer-assessment). 

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., (2005). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press. Black, P., & William, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148. Brookhart, M., S. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 161-180. Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible Learning in Digital World. London: Kogan Entwistle, N., McCune, V and Hounsell, D. (2002). Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of University Teaching-Learning Environments: Concepts, Measures and Findings, ETL Project (ESRC), Occasional Report 1 September. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. J. (1997). Reflective assessment of students’ research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment and Learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it Happen in the Classroom. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching. London: Routledge. McInerney, D., Brown, G.T.L., Liem, G.A.D. (2009) Student Perspectives on Assessment. What Students Can Tell Us about Assessment for Learning. Greenwich: CT: Information Age Publishing. Popham, W. J. (2002). Classroom Assessment - What Teachers Need to Know. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. Reineke, R.A. (1998). Challenging The Mind, Touching the Heart: Best assessment Practices, CA, Corwin Oaks: Thousand Oaks. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, Volume I. Chicago: Rand McNally, 39-83. Semeraro, R., (2006). La valutazione della didattica universitaria. Milano: FrancoAngeli Stiggins, R. (1997). Student-Centred Classroom Assessment (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.