A Multilevel Approach to Meeting Special Educational Needs in The Netherlands
Author(s):
Ed Smeets (presenting / submitting) Guuske Ledoux (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 12, Teacher Attitudes

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-13
09:00-10:30
Room:
D-505
Chair:
Gottfried Biewer

Contribution

As in other European countries, there is an increasing focus in The Netherlands on the inclusion of pupils with special educational needs (SEN) in mainstream schools. However, some twenty years after the first steps were made in this process, the percentage of pupils in special schools, which ranges between 4 and 5, still has not substantially decreased. Starting 2014, more control will be handed over to regional clusters of schools with respect to setting up and financing support for pupils with SEN. The system that relies on fixed criteria for determining which pupils in mainstream schools are eligible for additional funding because of SEN and for determining which pupils can be admitted to a special school will be abandoned. In future, a fixed budget will be available for meeting special needs, as opposed to the current system in which costs depend upon the number of pupils that meet the fixed criteria.

Several barriers are hampering the provision of adequate education to pupils with SEN in mainstream primary schools. In this respect, teachers’ attitudes on inclusion have been found to be relevant (Avramidis & Norwich, 2002; Cook, 2001; Poulou & Norwich, 2000). In addition, teachers’ competences are crucial in detecting SEN and preparing and applying appropriate interventions (Miller, 2003; Mooij & Smeets, 2006, 2009). Meijer (2001) for example clarified that teachers have difficulties in dealing with pupils with emotional and behavioural disorders. Avramidis and Norwich (2002) pointed out that one factor that is consistently associated with more positive attitudes of teachers towards inclusion is the availability of support services at classroom and school levels. This involves both physical support (e.g. resources, teaching materials, ICT equipment, and a restructured physical environment) and human support (e.g. learning support assistants, special teachers, and speech therapists). Maras (2005) emphasized the value of multi-agency support, involving multidisciplinary teams and interagency work, in providing effective care to children. Multidisciplinary teams, or youth care advisory teams, can advise school staff about pupils or they may refer pupils to care organizations. School clusters in The Netherlands include mainstream as well as special schools and are co-ordinated by a cluster co-ordinator. These clusters may provide various kinds of support to mainstream schools, e.g. by remedial educationalists or peripatetic teachers, and they may contribute to professional development.

The goal of the present study is to address the role of school clusters, mainstream primary schools and teachers in providing education to pupils with SEN, as well as the support that is provided to teachers in order to be able to meet various special needs in their classes. The following research questions are addressed:

1) What kind of support is provided by regional school clusters to schools and teachers with respect to educating pupils with SEN in mainstream primary schools?

2) To what extent are teachers supported in order to enable them to provide adequate education to pupils with SEN?

3) Which factors influence the teachers’ ability at providing adequate education to pupils with SEN?

Method

The study was carried out in six regional clusters of primary schools. In each of the clusters, face-to-face interviews were conducted with the school cluster co-ordinators, staff involved in providing support to schools and teachers, and members of school boards. All in all, 24 professionals were interviewed. Web surveys were completed by 695 teachers and 155 special educational needs co-ordinators. In addition to the teacher survey, 39 vignettes were presented to the teachers. These vignettes described various kinds of pupil disorders or difficulties. Three vignettes were developed for each problem type, ranging from a relatively mild version of the disorder in question to a more severe disorder. Teachers were asked to indicate whether they would be able to provide adequate instruction in their classroom to the pupils described. Apart from this, classroom observations were carried out in 52 schools. These were based on the validated instrument CLASS, and addressed emotional support, classroom management, and quality of instruction. In addition to descriptive analyses, multilevel analyses were carried out in order to examine the influence of factors at the school as well as teacher level on various outcome variables.

Expected Outcomes

One of the outcomes from the interviews is that school clusters differ considerably in the type and extent of support they provide, as well as in their contribution to professional development. Survey outcomes and outcomes from classroom observations show a number of significant differences between school clusters and between schools as well. More than 50 per cent of the teachers surveyed felt not competent enough to provide instruction without additional support to pupils with visual impairment, hearing impairment, severe speech impairment, or Down syndrome. The majority felt able to meet the needs of pupils with mild versions of ADHD, social-emotional problems, and autism, but the majority could not cope with severe cases of ADHD or aggressive behaviour in their classroom. The multilevel analyses showed that teachers who, according to their responses to the vignettes, felt more capable at providing instruction to pupils with SEN in their classes held more positive attitudes towards inclusion of pupils with SEN, and were more confident about their own competences at addressing cognitive differences between pupils. A larger number of pupils in class and a higher percentage of pupils with SEN in class were related to feeling less capable at educating pupils with SEN.

References

Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration / inclusion: A review of the literature, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17 (2), 129-147. Cook, B.G. (2001). A Comparison of Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Their Included Students with Mild and Severe Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 34 (4), 203-213. Maras, P. (2005). An international model for developing capacity for addressing the needs of ‘at risk’ youth: a French-English affaire? European Educational Research Journal, 4 (2), 100-108. Meijer, C.J.W. (Ed.) (2001). Inclusive education and effective classroom practices. Middelfart, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Miller, A. (2003). Teachers, Parents and Classroom Behaviour. A Psychosocial Approach. Maiden-head, UK: Open University Press. Mooij, T., & Smeets, E. (2006). Design, development and implementation of inclusive education. European Educational Research Journal, 5 (2), 94-109. Mooij, T., & Smeets, E. (2009). Towards systemic support of pupils with emotional and behavioural disorders. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13 (6), 597-616. Poulou, M., & Norwich, B. (2000). Teachers’ causal attributions, cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 559-581.

Author Information

Ed Smeets (presenting / submitting)
Radboud University
ITS
Nijmegen
Guuske Ledoux (presenting)
University of Amsterdam
Kohnstamm Institute
Amsterdam

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.