Lifelong learning and the recognition of professional experience: a proposal at the Spanish University
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Poster

Session Information

22 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2014-09-03
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area C (between B019 - B024)
Chair:

Contribution

When analyzing the impact posed by the paradigm of education throughout life, we notice that many have discussed the need of training at different stages of life, but few have addressed the actual revolution this approach poses: the demise of the hegemony of formal education as the sole place for training. Granting the same level of accreditation to learning acquired at different settings implies a radical change in the educational systems planning, particularly vocational training and higher education, while also impacting the certification of professional qualifications arising from such settings. This fact has progressively emerged not out of pedagogical conviction but out of the pressure exerted by the market, which demands the achievement of economic development and employability, and cannot afford losing or wasting human capital. Hence, in order to enhance the professional training level it is necessary to promote more flexible learning pathways, facilitating the transition from study to work, promoting the validation of non-formal and informal learning (COM 2012a). Therefore, it becomes crucial to acknowledge acquired skills, regardless of the setting where they were obtained, by means of objective and rigorous criteria that recognize the fulfillment of equal academic purposes.

Over the last decade the European Union has been very sensitive to this issue, because "its impact is important for helping to better match skills and labor demand, promoting greater transferability of skills across sectors, and facilitating the mobility in the European labor market "(COM, 2012c). In this sense, and according to the European guidelines, the Spanish University agreed to include different learning paths as valid scenarios that share the same official recognition.

We are not facing a new situation; the definition developed by the International Labor Organization (ILO) more than 3 decades ago states: "formal recognition of occupational qualifications of workers regardless of how they were acquired" (1979). The acknowledgment of learning requires a process of evaluation, supported by methodologies and credible, valid and reliable tools, which recognize and certify a person as having acquired certain level of achievement in specific skills (COM, 2012c). Thus, the level of acquired skills by training in non-formal and / or informal spaces is equated, though this is not the place to address the discussion concerning the content and validity of both settings.

Now, while we already have a body of research and proven experience regarding the certification of formal learning that supports its validity and rigor, this is not the case regarding skills acquired in other settings. Further research and contrasting experiences are needed. Certainly the tools of formal evaluation assessment cannot be used, given their complexity, when facing this form of contextual learning that intends to become a formal certification. In this sense, the goal is to develop an assessment process that recognizes and accredits skills achieved by means of informal processes, such as experience acquired throughout life. 

Although this method of validation of learning has been broadly implemented in many European countries, such possibility was not available for Spain until its incorporation into the European Higher Education Area. Therefore, the Faculty of Education at UNED has launched a pioneering experience in Spain which aim is the recognition of professional experience in the Social Education Degree, thus addressing student’s rights while serving as an innovative experience that lays the foundation of this procedure of recognition, according to rigor, transparency and objectivity criteria that focus on every process of evaluation and validation of learning. Our goal is to satisfy this new demand, in order to develop within a reflective practice a procedure of evaluation that enables the recognition of quality professional experience within the qualifications offered by higher education.

Method

As a starting point the process and tools for the evaluation of professional experience were designed for the Bachelor Degree of Social Education, offered by the Faculty of Education at UNED. This took into account (a) the experience previously gained in the subject of Practices of the Diplomat in Social Education of the aforementioned university, (b) our participation in the program for the recognition of professional experience at the level of professional training, undertaken by the Spanish Ministry of Education and the Spanish Ministry of Employment, with the collaboration of the Professional Association of Social Educators, as well as (c) the experience accrued by other European universities. In accordance to the regulations it was established that this recognition ought to be completed within a maximum of 36 ECTS (6 subjects) in the study plan. It focused exclusively on labor activity that accredited at least 4500 hours of professional experience in a given area, fulfilled the specific competences of Social Education, and was developed within the last 8 years. Regarding the process followed, it consisted in 3 phases: • Phase I: the student provided an official certification of his/her working life and employer. • Phase II: development of a self-report that reflects the skills exercised and their level of attainment. • Phase III: an interview on the level of achievement of the skills acquired. This experience was developed in 2 courses, 2011-12 and 2012-13, with an enrollment of 7,988 and 7,900 students respectively. In the first round 199 applications were submitted and 222 in the second. The methodology conducted to analyze the results obtained in this survey is descriptive and follows the comparative perspective of both calls.

Expected Outcomes

The strength of this proposal stresses the great reception our students have shown, since many of them join the area of socio-educational intervention while coming from a working background, and this is the first time that the university recognizes their professional experience. The acknowledgement of their activity represents a clear approach to their practical reality, which assesses the link between university studies and professional occupation. This also confirms the feasibility, relevance and rigor of the process and tools. Among the weaknesses detected we highlight the students’ perception of this strategy as an administrative procedure, hence leading to poor participation. In many cases there was also a significant low capacity to link theory and practice. This leads us to state that, despite having much experience, the study of a higher degree could get them closer to the meaning of their work while deepening in the different theories that endorse their decisions, that is, knowing how to reflect on their own practice and contributing to their professional improvement. The kind of students who submitted for recognition were professionals who had an average of 6 years working in a specific area of social intervention, featuring the care sector of families, minors and youth in risk of social exclusion, both in private and public domains. These are workers that have functions and perform tasks proper to their Bachelor degree and who need this recognition as a requirement to keep their job. No doubt this proposal attempts to make visible what has been learned outside the formal system, taking advantage of all the pathways and opportunities for learning (COM, 2012a), validating them in a demanding and rigorous way. If we agree that education continues throughout life, we must address all learning scenarios where education takes place. However, acknowledging this training by means of testable, transferable and reliable criteria constitutes the great challenge and opportunity of learning generated in professional environments.

References

CEDEFOP (2013). Benefits of vocational education and training in Europe for people, organizations and countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Recuperado de: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/4121_en.pdf COM (2012a). Council Recommedation of 20 December 2012 on the validation of no formal and informal learning. 398/01. Recuperado de: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:398:0001:0005:EN:PDF COM (2012b). Un nuevo concepto de educación: invertir en las competencias para lograr mejores resultados socioeconómicos. 669. Recuperado de: http://ec.europa.eu/education/news/rethinking/com669_es.pdf COM (2012c). Recomendación del Consejo sobre la validación del aprendizaje no formal e informal. 485 Recuperado de: http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-olicy/doc/informal/proposal2012_es.pdf EURYDICE (2013). Recognition of prior non-formal and informal learning in Higher Education. Recuperado de: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/focus-on/152.pdf FOREM (2010). Estudio comparativo de los modelos europeos de acreditación de competencias. Madrid: Fundación Tripartita Recuperado de: http://www.fundaciontripartita.org/almacenv/webpubpro/textbase/aacc02/anexos/20100178.pdf Manzano, N., Martín-Cuadrado, A. y Ruiz-Corbella, M. (2012). El reconocimiento de competencias profesionales adquiridas por experiencia laboral: la formación de orientadores, asesores y evaluadores. Revista de Educación, 359, 657 – 673. Medina, O. y Sanz Fernández, F. (2009a). Los sistemas de reconocimiento y acreditación de los aprendizajes formales e informales: referencias históricas, funciones socioeducativas y perspectiva teórica. Revista de Educación, 348, 253 – 281. Medina, O. y Sanz, F. (2009b). El reconocimiento y la acreditación de la experiencia. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 22, 165-193. NUFFIC et al. (2009). Recognition of Non-formal and Informal Learning: Learning Outcomes. Final Report. The Hague. Recuperado de: http://www.rpl.naric.org.uk/documents/final%20report.pdf NUFFIC (coord) (2012). European Area of Recognition Manual. Recuperado de http://www.eurorecognition.eu/manual/ear_manual_v_1.0.pdf Retortillo, A. (2010). La evaluación, reconocimiento y acreditación de los aprendizajes no formales e informales en el ámbito universitario: elementos para el debate. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 14 (1), 218-226. Rimbau, E. et al (2008). El reconocimiento de los aprendizajes adquiridos por la experiencia previa: un nuevo reto para el sistema universitario. Estudios sobre Educación, 15, 31-51. Sanz, F. (2005). La validación universitaria de los aprendizajes adquiridos en la experiencia: su contexto económico y social. Revista de Educación, 338, 101 -124. Tejada, J. (2011). La evaluación de las competencias en contextos no formales: dispositivos e instrumentos de evaluación. Revista de Educación, 354, 731 – 745 Werquin, P. (2010). Recognition of Non-Formal and Informal Learning: Country Practices. Paris: OECD. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/44600408.pdf

Author Information

Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia UNED
Teoría de la Educación y Pedagogía Social
Madrid
Marta Ruiz-Corbella (presenting)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia - UNED
Teoría de la Educación y Pedagogía Social
Madrid
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia UNED, Spain
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia UNED, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.