27 SES 11 B, Communication and Learning in the Classroom
Our research focuses on the formative assessment practices from the study of interactions between the teacher and the students in the classroom. One of the main research areas in formative assessment is the quality of feedback, as it is thought to be an important way to enhance students’ learning. Hattie and Timperley (2007) conclude, in their review of research on feedback, that it “is among the most critical influences on student learning”. Results in this field of research has produced some general recommendations for teachers, but very few outcomes taking into account the context of production of teachers’ feedback.
We are interested in specific moments of the classroom which correspond to moments where the students encounter difficulties in progressing in the task. We assume that these moments can provide information about the lack of appropriated feedback from the teacher. Our study integrates some elements of the context.
A variety of definitions of the term “formative assessment” exist in the literature. For example, Wiliam & Thompson (2007) suggests that assessment for learning can be conceptualized as consisting in five key strategies;
- Clarifying, sharing, and understanding learning intentions and criteria for success;
- Engineering effective classroom discussions, questions, and tasks that elicit evidence of learning;
- Providing feedback that moves learners forward;
- Activating students as instructional resources for one another;
- Activating students as the owners of their own learning.
What characterizes most of the definitions of formative assessment is providing feedback to students and teacher about where the learners are in their learning, where they are going and what needs to be done to get them there (Carver & Scheier, 1999; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Wiliam, 2010).These three processes are at stake also in students’ self-regulation of learning.
Indeed self-regulation theory involves learners’ questioning about (1) what is my goal? (2) Where I am right now? and (3) How to get there ? (Andrade, 2010; Carver & Scheier, 1999). Within the framework of formative assessment, the main purpose of feedback is to reduce discrepancies between the goal and the current state.
Self-regulation involves students in thinking about the quality of their own products and processes (Andrade, 2010). Many research shows that this process is positively connected to academic achievement. Indeed, self-regulated learners use a wide variety of strategy to promote learning (e.g. goal setting, selected adapting learning strategies, managing affect and motivation, monitoring progress, seeking feedback etc.). In contrast, less effective learners, have minimal self-regulation and depend much more on external factors (teachers, peers, or the task for guidance and feedback) (Pintrich, 2000; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2004).
According to Hattie & Timperley (2007) feedbacks that aim at improving students' strategies and improvements in the task are most powerful. Even though many researches have studied the quality of feedbacks, and their effects on students learning, very few took into account the context which could explain the production of feedbacks.
Our study aims at understanding what could entail the production, by the teacher, of a given feedback in a given context. More specifically we focus on the reasons why a teacher could give a poor feedback to students which encounter difficulties in progressing in the task.
Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. A. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook for formative assessment (pp.90-105). New York: Routledge. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. In R. S.Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 12, pp. 1–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112. Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Bokaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and impicatios for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. A. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook for formative assessment (pp.18-40). New York: Routledge. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp.323-349). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.