24 SES 02 A, Issues in Mathematics Teacher Education (Part 1)
Paper Session: to be continued in 24 SES 03
In this paper we analyse how the didactical analysis of specific professional tasks in mathematics may led mathematics teachers’ trainers to redesign specific mathematics tasks to better support prospective teachers to develop their mathematical and educative competences. We aim to encourage future teachers of mathematics to improve their professional practice by equipping them with didactical tools based on a rigorous theoretical foundation (Zavlaswski & Sullivan, 2011). For this reason we discuss in this paper the results of a research process framed in the “Mathematics Teacher Training Program” [Master Program] addressed to future teachers for middle and high schools, provided at the University of Barcelona. We expect to discuss tools for a descriptive and explanatory analysis aiming to answer “what happens in the classroom and why?”
Our general intention in such a program is led future teachers to develop the [professional] ability to (re)design sequences of suitable tasks, as well as to make them able to re-design their own designs of school tasks. In our study we call ‘professional task’ those tasks that we propose to future teachers in order to encourage them doing didactic analysis and developing their didactical analysis competencies. We understand ‘competence’ the ability for designing, applying and evaluating sequences of learning by means of didactic analysis techniques and quality criteria. It is also assumed that someone may reflect and improve their competence in terms of the analysis of mathematical classrooms, in order to make best use of the opportunities for being a teacher as teacher enquirer (Mason & Johnston-Wilder, 2004).
We want to focus on some immediate effects over the Program. We found them when analysing prospective teachers’ thoughts emerging from their feedback with the researchers; and also emerging from our analysis of some impacts of the program itself. Such above mentioned development, it is stated when future teachers incorporate and use tools for the description, explanation and process valuation of mathematical school teacher/learning practices.
In this paper we discuss data emerging out from a teaching research project based on an inquiry and reflective practicing framework in which we design and implement diverse teacher training cycles as teaching experiments (Tzur, Sullivan & Zaslavsky, 2008) for developing transversal competencies such as “citizenship”, “digital competency”, “didactical analysis”, among others.
The development of the cycles was based from the very beginning of the research process in six big types of professional tasks: (a) analysis of practices, objects and mathematical processes; (b) analysis of didactic interactions, conflicts and norms; (c) evaluation of tasks and classroom episodes using criteria of didactic suitability or quality; (d) design and implementation of a lesson in their [prospective teachers] period of internship; (e) analysis and valuation of the suitability of the didactic implemented unit; (f) improvement of their lessons designs (for future implementation).
The analysis and description of the mathematical activity is conducted using the theoretical constructs proposed by the ‘Ontosemiotic’ approach (Font, Planas y Godino, 2010). According to this perspective, the mathematical activity plays a central role and it is modelled in terms of systems of operative and discursive practices. From these practices the different types of related mathematical objects emerge building cognitive or epistemic configurations among them. Problem-situations support and contextualize the mathematical activity; languages (symbols, notations, and graphics) may serve as tools for action; arguments justify the procedures and propositions embedded within the concepts. According to this approach, the objects appearing in mathematical practices might be considered from a dual dimension.
Font, V., Planas, N. & Godino, J. D. (2010). Modelo para el análisis didáctico en educación matemática [A model for didactic analysis in mathematics education]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(1), 89-105. Garuti,R & Boero,P (2002) Interiorisation of forms of argumentation: A case study. In A.D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (eds) Proceedings of 26th PME Conference, (Vol. 2, pp. 408-415). Norwich UK University of West Amglia. Laborde, C., Perrin-Glorian, M.J.; Sierpinska, A. (2005). Beyond the Apparent Banality of the Mathematics Classroom (1-12). Netherlands: Springer. Mason, J.; & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004). Designing and Using Mathematical Tasks. Tarquin: London. Tzur, R., Sullivan, P., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Examining teachers' use of (non-routine) mathematical tasks in classrooms from three complementary perspectives: Teacher, teacher educator, researcher. In O. Figueras & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the 32nd Conference of the PME, and PME-NA (Vol. 1, pp. 133-137). México: PME. Zaslavsky, O., & Sullivan, P. (Eds.). (2011). Constructing knowledge for teaching: Secondary mathematics tasks to enhance prospective and practicing teacher learning. New-York: Springer.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.