The Eduscratch case: supporting the development of key competences in school curricula
Author(s):
Luis Tinoca (presenting / submitting) Maria João Gomes Luis Valente
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

03 SES 14 A, Curriculum Change and the Key Competences

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-05
15:30-17:00
Room:
B110 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Luis Tinoca

Contribution

Key competences are described by the European Commission as combinations of knowledge, skills and attitudes, which facilitate the application of knowledge to real world contexts. Individuals need them in order to function effectively in the 21st century (Lawn & Grek, 2012). Eight key competences are seen as essential by the European Framework; these are communication in the mother tongue, communication in (multiple) foreign languages, math competence and basic competences in science and technology, digital competences, learning to learn, social and civic competences, sense of initiative and entrepreneurship, and cultural awareness and expression. There is a range of terminology used to refer to “key competences” in EU member states, which sometimes reflects differences in emphasis and contexts. Alongside social and economic changes, there are three main theoretical influences that have shaped the development of key competences as a policy objective; these are a social perspective on education, and ideas about workplace competences (Gordon et al., 2012).

Key competences came onto the policy agenda in EU member states at different times over the last two decades partly through the influence of European Commission and OECD research (Gordon et al., 2012). Their particular manifestation is shaped by a member state’s history, prevalent educational philosophy and educational structures. There has been some debate about the ideological focus of key competences. As such, there is no common model across EU member states for the incorporation of key competences into national curricula. They are often conceived of in terms of a cross curricular approach, rather than treated as separate subjects (Pepper, 2011). In order to integrate key competences into an existing curriculum, decisions need to be made about how they sit in relation to existing subjects; whether one set of key competences applies to all learners or whether different sets are needed according to age or grade; and whether key competences can be acquired in a cumulative fashion, and therefore whether progression routes should be specified.

The Key Competence Network (KeyCoNet) is a European Policy Network on the Implementation of Key Competence Development (KCD) in School Education. This project aims to analyze the implementation process for key competence development in various European countries in general education at primary and secondary level. The network includes a total of 18 partners from 10 European countries focused on identifying and analysing emergent strategies in implementing key competences into education reforms, and on this basis aims to produce recommendations for policy and practice. The objective is to identify, analyze and map key competence development initiatives and their implementation strategies across Europe and to effectively impact on policy and practice by increasing the network's influence through dissemination and enlarging its membership.

This network of partners includes nine Ministries in charge of education or national agencies specialised in curriculum and assessment issues, inspectorates and school heads representatives, and seven university departments, some of them specialised in key competences issues, others providing teacher training; two European partners; Ministries connecting departments/national agencies in charge of curriculum development, teacher training, student assessment, learning resources, etc. In fact, the network aims to bring together those able to make strategic and potentially systemic decisions (Ministries) in cooperation with practitioners (teacher trainers, inspectorates), and grounded by evidence (university departments); in addition, individual scientific experts will also be associated to this partnership.

University of Minho, Portugal

Method

To illustrate the development of initiatives in this area, the network as so far gathered a collection of 40 exemplary cases on initiatives from which 5 case studies have already been developed considered as the most interesting by the network members; for the most inspiring case studies, videos will be produced (interviews with initiators, classroom practice when applicable, etc.). Next, we will present one of the developed case studies so as to illustrate one particular initiative, supporting the development of key competences in school contexts in Europe (Tinoca, Gomes & Valente, 2013) The EduScratch initiative aims to contribute to the creation and development of a teachers’ community of practice on the educational use of an intuitive programming tool. This tool allows the development of computational thinking and has proven to have huge potential in developing different types of skills (digital and subject-relate) in students. EduScratch is an initiative aimed at promoting the educational use of a programming language – Scratch – by supporting, training and sharing good practices among the Portuguese educational community. It has been successfully implemented in grades K-12. Even though its natural focus is on ICT competences, EduScratch has also had a diverse impact on a variety of other key competences, depending on the different implementation context. Furthermore, given the innovative nature of EduScratch projects, the initiative has also brought about a clear development of other key competences: e.g. communication skills when participants are required to share, discuss, clarify and present their projects; learning to learn competences due to the highly student-centred approach; and also initiative and entrepreneurship, since students are encouraged to adapt and customise their own projects. Therefore, although the main focus of EduScratch is on the development of digital competences, we have found that all other key competences have also been supported, to varying degrees, depending on the contextual factors of implementation. Two people were interviewed for this case study: the coordinator of the ICT Competence Centre, also responsible for the coordination of the EduScratch initiative, and the professor of the Polytechnic Institute responsible for accompanying and supporting the project. These individuals were chosen as they have been involved in this project from the beginning, overseeing its implementation and development, and because they represent key partners of the initiative.

Expected Outcomes

The performed analysis is centre around seven main issues: contextual influence; substance-related issues; partnership related issues; strategy related issues, mainstreaming-related issues; systemic aspects; and evaluation-related issues. Preliminary analysis emphasize that there is no uniform approach to implementing key competences, and approaches vary greatly according to the education system and school context. The implementation of key competences can be supported by changes in school culture, since they apply across all school subjects and necessitate changes in curriculum, assessment, learning environments and the role of teachers. Schools should involve teachers in decision-making around implementing key competences, and consider involving partners including universities, social services, other schools and families and communities, in the planning stages and on an ongoing basis (Dabrowski and Wisniewski, 2011). While the motivation behind the move towards key competences in school education is largely social and economic, their entry into education policies represents the mainstreaming of several long-running themes in educational and social research. Among others, these concern the social aspects of learning, theories about the most effective ways to transfer knowledge, and theories about the competences individuals need to work effectively. Although some key competences refer to subject knowledge, they are essentially cross-curricular in nature, and hence can be developed through every school subject. This is challenging given that schools in most EU member states, particularly secondary schools, are structured according to subjects. There is no uniform approach to integrating key competences into school curricula, which requires decisions about how to identify, define and frame key competences, including specifying the ways in which they are relevant to different levels of schooling. Implementation at the national level will depend on educational philosophies, historical context, outside influences and a range of other factors.

References

Dabrowski, M., and Wisniewski, J. (2011). Translating key competences into the school curriculum: lessons from the Polish experience. European Journal of Education, 46(3). European Commission (2007). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning: European Reference Framework. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Gordon, J., Rey, O., Siewiorek, A., Vivitsou, M., and von Reis Saari, J (2012) KeyCoNet 2012 Literature Review: Key competence development in school education in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet. Lawn, M. & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education - governing a new policy space. Oxford: UK, Symposium Books. Niemi, H., Kynäslahti, H., and Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S. (2012). Towards ICT everyday life in Finnish schools: seeking conditions for good practices. Learning, Media and Technology, DOI:10.1080/17439884.2011.651473 Pepper, D. (2011). Assessing Key Competences across the Curriculum — and Europe. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 335-354. Tinoca, L., Gomes, M.J. & Valente, L. (2013) The EduScracth KCD case study. Brussels: European Schoolnet.

Author Information

Luis Tinoca (presenting / submitting)
University of Lisbon, Portugal
University of Minho, Portugal
University of Minho, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.