Construction of Proffesional Identity of Schoolbased Teacher Educators.
Author(s):
Siv Kristin Yndestad Borgen (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 12 C, Autoethnography, Cognitive Engagement and Professional Identity

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-05
09:00-10:30
Room:
B226 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Graeme Hall

Contribution

The main concern in the current research project is to follow schoolbased teacher educators (Korthagen, 2000) in practice schools which are implementing the 2010 reform for teacher education in primary and lower secondary schools in Norway. The project aims at analyzing how schoolbased teacher educators cultural formats their identity as teacher educators within a community of practice.

The project is part of a broader program, Teacher professionalism, developed at the Center for Educational Research at Bergen University College.

In this project, the main intention is to gain knowledge about how the practice teacher develop his/ her role as a teacher educator. Framed in social-constructional approaches I add the assumption that identity is constructed in a community that consists of several individuals, through communication and in a given context they interact and share and create new knowledge.

                                                                                               
The project has a theoretical framework; Social Constructivism (Burr, 1995: Wenneberg, 2010) this includes Discursive theories (Jørgensen & Philips,1999),  and Socio-Cultural theories (Vygotsky, 1978) Within sociocultural approaches knowledge is perceived to be constructed through practical activity were groups of individuals collaborate within a cultural context. These approaches thereby presuppose that the human being constructs his or her own understanding in a linguistic, social and cultural context. This implies that the study of human learning should be conducted within the contexts where the human being is situated. With this perception of research as a point of departure I will start my research.

The project contains a special focus on Community of Practice. According to Lave and Wenger (1991) learning occurs primarily through participation in a community of practice. The novice has a peripheral participation; but her/his participation is undergoing a rising complexity gaining a fuller membership within the community, he/she will end up as a master. Put it simply, the individual learns when communicating, by participating and by actuating with other individuals.

To construct knowledge is closely related to the practice community and the individual's ability to participate. All individuals join a variety of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998). Within a particular community, the participants are involved in a common practice based on mutual engagement, shared responsibilities, shared cultural background, and common tools/artifacts. However, the knowledge construction is also an experience of identity leading to the transformation of the self. In the learning process, one starts as a novice and through various practices knowledge which is distributed among the participants in the situated practice community. Eventually, it will emerge new insight, knowledge, identity, and perceived more as a master for new novices. In the first part of the project one of the main issuses was to recognize different Communities of Practice that the school based teacher educator is, or has been a member of. And then try to find some main tracks of the identification process.

Starting point questions:
1. How does identity of the schoolbased teacher educator appear?
2. What factors seems to be of importance in the identity process?

The preliminary findings after analyzes regard question 1 showed me to main tracks; Marginalized and empowered identification process. In the presentation on the conference this year I will focus on preliminary findings of the second research question.

Method

The methods used in this project are all in a qualitative framework. An ethnographic study aims to study and describe a culture (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1987). It includes the study of the individuals’ daily experiences and it gives the researcher a good opportunity to analyze the individual actions from the participant’s perspectives (Postholm, 2010 s. 45-46). Micro-ethnographic studies similar to a large extent on macro-ethnographic, but it has some limitations fixes, this will both be related to the scope and duration. My project is limited with regard to both, mostly because of the project's timeframe.To gather data on schoolbased teacher educators, their interpretation of reality, analyzing this material in the light of theory and my own experience and interpretation will be a main activity for the project. The data collection process contains in-depth interviews, observations and Focusgroup-interviews. The informants are five school based teacher-educators and their students. The first phase in the collection process took place in autumn 2012, the second phase in spring 2013. To analyze the data collected I have used Constant Comparative method in the first phase of the work. This method orginates from Grounded Theory (Corbin & Strauss, 2008; Postholm, 2010).

Expected Outcomes

At this ECER conference most attention will be given the preliminary findings regard research-question two. Why do some school based teacher-educators explain their identity as teacher-educators as marginalized, and others as empowered?

References

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitativ Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Korthagen F.A.J. (2000). Teacher educators: from neglected group to spearhead in the development of education. In: G.M. Willems, J.H.J. Stakenborg & W. Veugelers. (eds.). Trends in Dutch teacher education. Garant, Leuven-Apeldoorn p. 35–48. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Postholm, M.B, (2010). Kvalitativ metode. En innføring med fokus på fenomenologi, etnografi og kasusstudier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Jørgensen, M.W., & Phillips, L. (2000). Diskursanalys som teori och metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Vygotsky, L.S (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L.S. (2001). Tenkning og tale. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag A/S. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: University Press. Wenneberg, S.B. (2010). Socialkonstruktivisme. Fredriksberg C:Samfundslitteratur.

Author Information

Siv Kristin Yndestad Borgen (presenting / submitting)
Bergen University College
Teacher education
Eidsvågneset

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.