Assessment in Higher Education after the Bologna process:
Author(s):
Diana Pereira (presenting / submitting) Maria Assunção Flores
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 01 A, Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-02
13:15-14:45
Room:
B020 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Gutiérrez-Esteban Prudencia

Contribution

 

This paper is a part of a broader research project in the context of the PhD in Educational Sciences, in Curriculum Development. The main goals are: i) to get know the perceptions of students and university teachers about assessment in higher education; ii) to identify methods of assessment in higher education from m the perspectives of both students and university teachers; iii) to identify changes and difficulties in assessing student learning from the perspective university teachers; iv) to understand the connection between assessment and learning from the perspective of both students and university teachers; v) to analyse different modes of assessment used by university teachers in the post-Bologna context.

Assessment in higher education has been challenged and changed after the implementation of the Bologna Process in Europe. The focus is on learning and on the active role of the student, but also on new methodologies of teaching and learning, and consequently on new forms of assessment (Bologna Declaration, 1999; Veiga Simão, Santos and Costa, 2003). In addition, assessment has been studied over the last decades and it has developed according to different understandings and conceptions such as “assessment as a tool for learning” (Dochy and Mcdowell, 1997), “assessment for learning” (Black and William, 1998) and “learner-centered assessment” (Webber, 2012). Webber (2012) draws attention to this new "paradigm of learning" in addition to changing the role of the student and that of the university teacher in order to create learning environments that allow students to build their knowledge (Webber, 2012). This perspective goes beyond an accreditation perspective and it highlights that assessment is inextricably linked to learning and vice versa.  Earlier studies have shown the relationship between assessment and learning (Scouller, 1998; Gibbs, 1999; Light and Cox, 2001), the way students see the assessment will determine how they will learn (Watering et al, 2008) and will guide the students’ learning (Segers, Gijbels and Thurlings, 2008; Boud, 1995). This implies that assessment practices should be indicators of what and how students should learn in addition to having to be consistent with the objectives or learning outcomes of the courses (Biggs, 2003).  This is even more crucial within the post-Bologna context in higher education. It is within this framework that the present study was carried out.

 

 

Method

Data were collected through interviews with university teachers (who taught 3rd-year students) and through questionnaires to 3rd-year students (n=634) in different areas of knowledge: Social Humanities Sciences, Life and Health Sciences, Natural and Environmental Sciences and Sciences and Engineering in five Portuguese Public Universities. Data were collected in 2012/2013. In total, 57 teachers participated in this study: 53% are male and 47% are female. Their age ranged between 30 and 68 years old. Most of them (58%) are Assistant Professors. Out of the 57 participants 23 were face-to-face interviewed and 34 teachers sent their answers via email. In this study 634 students participated: 412 are female and 219 are male. Their age ranged between 20 and 61 years old. Most of them are 20 years old (37.5%) and 21 years old (27,. %). The interviews were subject to content analysis, and the questionnaires were analysed through the use of SPSS version 20.0. In this paper, data from interviews with university teachers are presented.

Expected Outcomes

The results indicate that most participants said (n=23) changed their assessment practices after the Bologna Process. However, 21 teachers reported they have not changed their practices. Some university teachers also have not changed their practices since they are young teachers as they began to teach in the universities after the Bologna process was already implemented at their institutions. In some cases the courses already were designed under the assumptions of the Bologna Process and therefore there was no change. The results also suggest that the majority of participants (n = 40) agreed that assessment should focus not only on technical skills but also on soft skills because it prepares students to be dynamic, autonomous, capable of working in teams bringing them closer to their future professional world. In regard to assessment methods that encourage students to apply knowledge in real contexts, the participants claim that practical work, projects, problem solving exercises, simulations and group work are the most appropriate methods for assessing students’ learning.

References

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy and practice 5 (1), 7–74. Boud. D. (1995). Assessment and Learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page Limited. Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279-298. Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp.41-53). Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press. Guedes, M., Lourenço, J., Filipe, A., Almeida, L., Moreira, M. (2007). Bolonha: Ensino e Aprendizagem por Projecto. Lisboa: Centro Atlântico. Light, G. & Cox, R. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional. London: Sage Publications. Segers, M., Gijbels, D. & Thurlings, M. (2008). The relationship between students' perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 34 (1), 35 -44. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students‘ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examinations versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35:453-472. Veiga Simão, J., Santos, S. and Costa A. (2003). Ensino Superior: uma visão para a próxima década. Lisboa: Gradiva. Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F. & Rijt, J. (2008). Students‘ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education, 56:645-658. Webber, K. (2012). The Use of Learner-Centered Assessment in US Colleges and Universities. Research in higher education, 53:201-228.

Author Information

Diana Pereira (presenting / submitting)
University of Minho
Institute of Education
Braga
University of Minho, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.