What attracts foreign students to study in Turkey? An analysis of inbound student mobility in Turkey
Conference:
ECER 2009
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 06 B, Internationalisation of Higher Education (Part 1)

Paper Session. Continued in 22 SES 08 B.

Time:
2009-09-29
10:30-12:00
Room:
HG, HS 30
Chair:
Yann Lebeau

Contribution

This study aims to find out the dynamics attracting foreign students choosing Turkey for higher education study. Internationalization in higher education has been a topic of interest for many educational researchers. Scholars elaborated on internationalization as a policy issue for the countries (Enders, 2004; Teichler, 2004), stated the rationales of internationalization (e.g., Knight, 1999), documented the impact of internationalization on institutions (Kondakci, 2009), documented the main premises of international curriculum (Leask, 1999; Schmied and Shiba, 2007) and stated problems of subjects of international higher education mobility (viz., students and academicians) (Arambewela and Hall, 2008; Kondakci, Van den Broeck, and Yildirim, 2008; Tamaoka, Ninomiya, and Nakaya, 2003). A significant body of literature focused on the dynamics behind student mobility (Aupetit, 2006; Chen, 2006; Chen and Barnett, 2000; Li and Bray, 2007). These studies intended to find out the economic, political, academic, and social dynamics directing the students to particular countries while avoiding others. In general these studies used pull-push terminology to explain student mobility. In other words, this perspective suggest that there are factors in the host countries pulling the students to choose particular destinations and/or there are push factors in home country pushing the students to choose a particular host country. For example, Chen (2007) has recently document why East Asian students choose Canada for a graduate study. Li and Bray (2007) adopted the same thinking; however, they adapted a two-dimensional perspective into their analysis of pull-push factors. Pull-push understanding was derived from neo-classical economic theories of international migration (Massey et al., 1993). These theories in general assert that people tend to migrate from lower wage settings to higher wage settings. Since previous analyses have focused on student mobility from economically less developed countries to economically developed ones, the pull-push thinking has proved to be effective in explaining why students move from particular setting for higher education study into another. However, whether the pull-push think is applicable to explain student mobility from a developing country (low wage) into another developing one (low wage) needs to be investigated. In other words, what attracts students from developing or developed countries to choose a developing country for higher education study remained less investigated.

Method

This study aims to contribute answering this question by analyzing the dynamics pulling (or pushing) students to choose Turkey for higher education study. A survey with 361 foreign students, coming from 61 countries and studying in different universities in Turkey was conducted. The survey covers parts social, cultural, and academic experiences of foreign students. In this report only the reasons of choosing Turkey for a higher education study were included.

Expected Outcomes

The results suggest that foreign students chose Turkey because of high quality of academic practices in Turkey (41,6%), the desire to learn/experience a different culture (37%), liking Turkish people and Turkish culture (27,7), physical proximity of Turkey (22,5), scholarship providers’ demand (18,6), the possibility of finding a job after study (12,1%), and family related reason (8,5%). The results of this study suggest that their choices are determined by country related dynamics. However, economic reasons are not prominent in the choices of students. Rather, country related cultural and social reasons are prominent underlying reasons in choice of Turkey as a destination for a higher education study. Based on the findings, this study suggests that accommodating other approaches explaining triggering dynamics as well as the perpetuating dynamics of international migration will contribute to develop a full explanation of the dynamics of international student mobility.

References

Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2008). A model of student satisfaction: International postgraduate students from Asia. European Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 129-135. Aupetit, S. D. (2006). The brain drain in Mexico-a subject for research...or agenda? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(1), 103-120. Chen, L. (2006). Attracting East Asian students to Canadian graduate schools. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 77-105. Chen, T.-M., Barnett, G.A. (2000). Research on international student flows from a macro perspective: A network analysis of 1985, 1989 and 1995. Higher Education, 39, 435-453. Enders, J. (2004). Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education, 47, 361-382. Knight, J. (1999). Internationalization of higher education. In H. d. W. J. Knight (Ed.), Quality and internationalization in higher education (pp. 13-23). Paris: OECD. Kondakci, Y., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009, forthcoming). Institutional imperatives versus emergent dynamics: A case study on continuous change in higher education. Higher Education. Kondakci, Y., Van den Broeck, H., & Yildirim, A. (2008). Challenges of internationalization from foreign and local students’ perspectives: The case of management school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 448-463. Leask, B. (1999). Bridging the gap-internationalizing university curricula. Paper presented at the NLC National Education Conference, International Education: Adelaide. Li, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hing Kong and Macau. Higher Education, 53, 791-818. Massey, D. S., Arango, J. Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J.E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-466. Schmied, L. A., & Shiba, K.E. (2007). Internationalizing the curriculum: Bringing the world to east Tennessee. International Education, 36(2), 70-82 Tamaoka, K., Ninomiya, A., & Nakaya, A. (2003). What makes international students satisfied with a Japanese university? Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 119-128. Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 48, 5-26.

Author Information

Middle East Technical University
Department of Educational Sciences
Ankara
212
Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Middle East Technical University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.