Session Information
22 SES 02 A, Dialogues between Peers through Feedback, Observation and Instruction
Paper Session
Contribution
Our goal in this presentation is to examine the trends of volunteering of students in a Central Eastern European region. We intend to compare the occurrence and the type (traditional or new) of volunteering of students in teacher training and in other areas of higher education. We also want to examine as the motivations of students’ volunteering. Finally we examine what affects volunteering and the type of volunteering beside the field of training. We examine the effect of gender, social background of students, religiosity and value preferences on volunteering and on the type (motives) of volunteering. We want to find if the effect of the field of training exists after controlling the effect of other, above mentioned explanatory variables on volunteering and on the motivations of volunteering.Volunteering is a quite new activity of higher education students in Central-Eastern Europe. The common elements of volunteering are: it is a non-obligatory activity, it is carried out for the benefit of others (individuals, or specific organizations or society as a whole), it is unpaid and normally it takes place in an organized context (Wilson 2000, Chaan, Amrofell 1994, Handy et al. 2010, Dekker, Halman 2003). In the special literature the cross-cultural examinations have not dealt with Central-Eastern European tendencies of volunteering of higher education students yet.
The traditional motivations of volunteering are based on altruistic values (being useful for the society, doing something for others) and on the importance of social interactions and community. The modern motivations include career development, personal growth, work experience, professional improvement, gaining information, developing and practicing skills, getting a job more easily, enlarging human capital, making friends, meeting people with similar interest, useful leisure activity (learning and practicing sports and cultural activities). Among young generation the mixed motivation type is also frequent: e.g. helping others is also important for the students with modern motivations (Czike & Kuti 2006, Stefanescu & Osvat 2011, Handy et al. 2010). Inglehart (2003) showed that volunteering has not decreased these days in developed countries, only the traditional type of volunteering is less frequent. Based on Handy et al. (2010), the young generation today participates in new types of volunteering, in which their motivation is not dominantly altruistic.
Beside sociologists, social psychologists explore the motivations of volunteering as well. Clary et al. (1998) made a Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) scale based on the motivations of volunteering with 30 items, and made 6 factors from the items. In Hungary Bartal and Kmetty (2011) used a modified scale in an adult sample (59 items, 15 factors). Their results are more or less similar to that of the researchers gained in developed countries, but the effect of social values was larger and the effect of social norms and religiosity were smaller on volunteering in the Hungarian sample. Others sociologist (see Wilson 2000) have investigated the effect of parents on children’s volunteering (if the parents did voluntary activity or not, and they liked it or not), and the effect of community service in high schools on higher education students’ volunteering. (In Hungary in 2016 will be the first group, who will complete high school with community service practice, so its effect cannot be measured.)
Volunteering of higher education students could be a measurement of higher education efficiency as well. It is an intermediate variable between the effects of higher education on students’ competences. Volunteering –as higher education as well - increases the students’ academic development, other life skill development factors, and finally the civic consciousness and responsibility (see Astin, Sax 1998, Hesser 1995, Eyler, Giles and Braxton 1997, Mabry 1998)
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Astin, A. W. and Sax, L. J. (1998): How Undergraduates Are Affected by Service participation Journal of College Student Development Vol. 39, No 3. 251-263. Bartal A. M. and Kmetty Z. (2011): A Magyar önkéntesek motivációi – A Magyar Önkéntes Motivációs Kérdőív sztenderdizálásának eredményei. Civil Szemle 2011/4 7-30. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A., Haugen, J, and Miene, P. (1998): Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 6, 1516-1530. Cnaan, R. A. and Amrofell, L. M. (1994): Mapping Volunteer Activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(4): pp. 335-351. Czike K. and Kuti É. (2006): Önkéntesség, jótékonyság és társadalmi integráció. Budapest, Nonprofit Kutatócsoport Egyesület, Önkéntes Központ Alapítvány Dekker, P. and Halman, D. (2003 ed.): The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Kluver Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow Eyler, J., Giles Jr., D. E., and Braxton, J. (1997). The impact of service-learning on college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 5-15. Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Hustinx, L., Kang, C., Brudney, J. L., Haski-Leventhal, D., Holmes, K. , Meijs, L. C., Pessi, A. B., Ranade, B., Yamauchi, N. and Zrinscak, S. (2010): A Cross-Cultural Examination of Student Volunteering: Is It All About Résumé Building? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 3. 498 – 523. Hesser, G. (1995). Faculty assessment of student learning: Outcomes attributed to service-learning and evidence of changes in faculty attitudes about experiential education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 33-42. Inglehart, R. (2003): Modernization and Volunteering. In Dekker, P., Halman, D. (eds.): The Values of Volunteering. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, Kluver Academic/Plenum Publishers. 55 – 70. Mabry, J. B. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service learning and student outcomes: How time, contact and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 32-47. Stefanescu, F. and Osvat, C. (2011): Volunteer Landmarks among College Students. Anuarul Institutului de cercetari economico-sociale “Gh. Zane” nr, 20/2011, Iasi (being published) Wilson, J. (2000): Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: pp. 215-240.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.