Diversity in Secondary Schools: Metric Characteristics Of An “Ad hoc” Questionnaire To Know Counsellors’ Opinion On Implementation Of Diversity Programs
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Poster

Session Information

04 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2015-09-09
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area
Chair:

Contribution

Inclusion and diversity are probably two of the most challenging issues faced by education systems and schools (UNESCO, 1994). Furthermore, attention to diversity is a fundamental principle that should govern the whole basic education in order to ensure equal opportunities for all pupils to education and avoid, as far as possible, school failure and consequent risk of dropout (Ainscow et al., 2006). An inclusive approach was adopted like theoretical framework which proposes that equal opportunities are guaranteed if education is equal for all and emphasizes that education must be comprehensive and holistic and should provide students the maximum social and personal development for them and, therefore, inclusion is considered a social value (Echeita, 2013). In addition, the inclusive approach promotes education in terms of equity which implies that not only every student but the whole population is welcome at school. School must help students develop their full potential from an educational and social point of view. To analyse the extent to which such principles are put into practice in schools, an "ad hoc" instrument has been designed with reference to the paper "Index for Inclusion" (Booth & Ainscow, 2000). The purpose of this paper is to describe how the questionnaire was designed and the subsequent identification of the metric properties of this tool to evaluate the construct "Attention to Diversity" in schools of Secondary Education of Asturias. Our interest is based on these teachers point of view because they are the main agents in implementing policies, strategies and measures to improve the attention diversity programs in school. So, the expected objective is to know the school counsellors´ opinions about how the state secondary schools articulate the attention to diversity. In order to achieve this, the instrument has been designed to help identify and collect information about whether or not the organisation of centres takes into account the attention to the diversity of the students; whether or not the implemented measures for diversity are adapted to the context; how decisions are made regarding the organization, coordination and leadership is exercised by management teams in school, and finally, how the attitudes and teacher training are in this area. The main reason to design a specific instrument aimed to counsellors is justified by the fact that counsellors can provide key information regarding the organization and implementation of inclusive programs at schools. The functions of the counsellors in secondary education include the responsibility to actively collaborate in planning, monitoring, implementing and evaluating measures of attention to diversity (Ferrandis, Grau & Fortes, 2010). Counsellors are also the only members in schools that have specific initial training in this area, so we estimate that their vision is particularly interesting about these processes and putting them into action.

Then, the main objectives to be achieved with this work can be summarised as:

1)      To know the counsellors' opinion about how the attention to diversity program is articulated in secondary education schools.

2)      To design a questionnaire in order to obtain information on this matter.

3)      To validate the questionnaire.

This paper focuses on the second and third objectives.

Method

Considering the theoretical and conceptual framework adopted (inclusive education), the reviewed references on diversity (Ainscow et al., 2006; Booth & Ainscow, 2000; Echeita, 2013 & Moliner et al., 2008), the current Spanish and Asturian legislation about diversity programs (LOMCE, Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias, 162, julio 2007) and the counsellors´ functions (Ferrandis, Grau & Fortes, 2006), we have proposed a survey study to achieve the stated objectives and so, we’ve built a questionnaire. Previously, a table of contents has been produced using the following dimensions: context (instructions and directives on diversity), organization (protocols and criteria for decision-making on flexible groupings), coordination (between teaching teams and social services), measures of attention to diversity (adjustment of measures to schools), resources (human, material and financial), leadership (organization and revitalization), training (diversity training activities) and attitude (perception, methodological advice and action). These dimensions were chosen because they are the ones which are directly linked to the functions performed by counsellors regarding attention to diversity in schools. Then, we proceed to a validation process by experts and modifies the original instrument (remain, delete and add new items). Complementing the validation by experts, there has been a pilot application of the instrument. The pilot test was conducted in the autonomous community of Asturias. The questionnaire was sent through an on line form to the total population of counselors working in public secondary schools in Asturias (N = 80) and was completed by 51 counsellors, representing 63.75% of the total population. From the gathered information we proceeded to perform the analysis of its metric properties.

Expected Outcomes

The first draft of the questionnaire had the following structure: - Two questions regarding the type and location of the schools - Six questions about their personal and professional information: sex, age, background education and professional experience in the school - A Likert Scale composed by 62 items with information about the eight dimensions. To validate the instrument we chose a group of experts. This group of experts was made up of 10 counsellors who are currently taking part in a secondary school counselling working group in Avilés-Occidente area (Asturias-Spain). In order to obtain results about the degree of internal consistency, we calculated the statistic Cronbach’s alpha and obtained a value of .907, which is an excellent value if we take the scale of Nunnally (1978) as reference to interpret the results. Subsequently, an analysis of discrimination and internal consistency of the scale was performed. Initially, the first analysis was made in order to dismiss those items that showed low discrimination. In other words, those items that only reached correlations below .20 alongside the rest of the test were eliminated. In order to achieve this, the correlation item-test corrected and the internal test consistency (by calculating Cronbach's alpha) were calculated by iteration procedure until all items showed higher or equal discrimination than .20. Thus, the internal consistency goes from .907 to .914. This increase is not very high but eliminating seven items a scale in which all items discriminate above 0.20 is achieved. Finally, the instrument designed is reliable to measure the counsellor’s perception of how attention to diversity is structured in secondary school, based on both conceptual and theoretical proposals.

References

Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., Howes, A. y Smith R. (2006). Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. Nueva York: Routledge. Booth, T & Ainscow, M. (2000). Index for inclusion. Guía para la evaluación y mejora de la educación inclusiva. Madrid: Consorcio Universitario para la Educación inclusiva. Decreto 74/2007, de 14 de junio, por el que se regula la ordenación y establece el currículo de la Educación secundaria obligatoria en el Principado de Asturias. Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias, 162, de 12 de julio de 2007. Echeita, G. (2013). Inclusión y Exclusión Educativa. De Nuevo, "Voz y Quebranto". REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 11(2), 99-118. Recuperado de: http://www.rinace.net/reice/numeros/arts/vol11num2/art5.pdf Ferrandis, Mª. V., Grau, C. y Fortes, Mª. C. (2010). El profesorado y la Atención a la diversidad en la ESO. Revista Educación Inclusiva, 3(2), 11-28. LOMCE-Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 259, de 10 de diciembre de 2013. Moliner, O., Sales, A., Traver, J. A. y Ferrández, R. (2008). La atención a la diversidad en los centros de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: análisis de las variables facilitadoras y limitadoras de las prácticas docentes. Educación y Diversidad, 2, 99-127. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. UNESCO (1994): Declaración y Marco de Acción sobre Educación para todos. Conferencia Mundial. Dakar, Senegal, Septiembre.

Author Information

Joaquín-Lorenzo Burguera (presenting / submitting)
University of Oviedo (Spain)
Oviedo
University of Oviedo (Spain), Spain
Universidad de Oviedo
Ciencias de la Educación
Oviedo

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.