Relationship between Mathematical Teacher Content Knowledge and Knowing-to Act. Transitioning to New Standards to Measure Teacher Knowledge in Mexico

Session Information

WERA SES 08 C, Towards Mathematics Excellence in Education World-Wide

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
305. [Main]
Chair:
Brian Hudson

Contribution

Teacher knowledge is a critical topic for teaching, learning and culture. The process of teaching and learning is a decisive aspect to shape culture.  Therefore, to be focused on components of this process such as teacher knowledge is relevant for the educational field. Around the world, there is interest in researching teacher preparation programs to provide educational policy makers relevant information such as which types of teacher knowledge have a stronger impact on student learning (Tchoshanov, 2011). Several international studies focus on teacher preparation in countries such as Russia, USA, Singapore, Finland, etc. (e.g. TEDS-M Study, 2012).  However, Mexico is transitioning to new standards to evaluate teachers at the elementary and middle school. Recently, an educational reform was established in Mexico last year. This reform created an institution to assess the teacher’s knowledge of the aspects involved in their teaching such as content, curriculum, teaching practices, educational policies, among others. Therefore, it is critical to research about teacher knowledge in Mexico to help to this transition will be accepted and adopted sooner.  

Since the knowledge possessed by teachers has an impact on students’ learning, it is an educational issue worthy of study. Additionally, to know what kinds of knowledge have a direct influence on teaching practices could be used to enhance teacher education programs and teaching practices. This study aimed to provide insights that will provide awareness to teacher education programs and policy makers to make important decisions in regards of what teachers need to know for teaching mathematics in an effective manner.

The intent of this study was to measure middle school mathematical teachers’ content knowledge and its relationship with teachers’ “knowing-to act” ability.  In addition, conducting research in Mexico will allow for comparison studies with other countries, such as the United States or Russia, where studies of teacher content knowledge have been conducted (e.g. Tchoshanov, 2011).

This paper analyzed the mathematical teacher content knowledge and teachers’ “knowing-to act” (Mason and Spence, 1999) possessed by Mexican in-service teachers. This research drew on the Shulman’s teacher knowledge model (Shulman, 1986 &1987).  He defined content knowledge as “the amount of organization of knowledge per se in the mind of the teacher” (Shulman, 1986, p.9). This category of knowledge includes knowledge of facts, connections, models, generalizations and how the understanding of this content knowledge is structured and generated. This research examined the three different cognitive types of mathematical teacher content knowledge: cognitive type 1 (which refers to the teacher content knowledge of facts and procedure); cognitive type 2 (the knowledge of concepts and connections); and cognitive type 3 (knowledge of models and generalizations).

The second type of knowledge that was studied is “knowing-to act”. “Knowing-to act” is the process in which “knowledge [that] enables people to act creatively rather than merely react to stimuli with trained or habituated behavior” (Mason and Spence, 1999, p.136). The following questions guided the research:

  1. To what extent the cognitive type of middle school teachers’ knowledge is associated with teachers’ knowing-to act?

Method

Seventy mathematics middle school teachers were selected and invited to fill out two surveys. The criterion for selection of these teachers focused on what they were teaching at the time of the study; all participants were teaching at least one mathematics course at middle school level. A survey named teacher content knowledge survey (TCKS) was administered to these (70) teachers to measure their cognitive types of content knowledge. The TCKS was designed by Tchoshanov (2011). This survey consists of 33 multiple choice-items about relevant topics for secondary grades teachers’ knowledge: Number sense, Algebra, Geometry and Measurement, Probability and statistics. The instrument was field-tested during 2005-2006 (Tchoshanov, Lesser, & Salazar, 2008). “The value of the coefficient of .839 suggests that the items comprising the TCKS are internally consistent (standard error=.59).” (Tchoshanov, 2011, p.148). A second survey named knowing-to act survey (KtAS) was about the teachers’ actions enacted during teaching mathematics at particular moments. The teacher sample was drawn from 26 different public middle schools. The KtAS survey is composed by 11 items. Each item describes a classroom situation. The nature of the situation varies. Even though these situations were included because they are commonly found during mathematics instruction, they challenge the “knowing-to act” of the teachers. These situations are called “knowing-to Act” situations (KtA situations). The selection of these particular situations was done considering previous research where the implication of the challenge of the “knowing-to act” was already identified (e.g. Mason & Spence, 1998; Rowland et al., 2005). The administration of both surveys was simultaneous. In other words, teachers were provided with both surveys at the same time. Mathematics middle school teachers were allowed to complete both surveys in two hours. The administration of the surveys was face-to-face: the researcher and the participating teachers. The administration of these surveys took place during the school year 2013-2014. A quantitative research design was implemented in order to answer the research question of the study. Therefore, a correlation analysis was designed and implemented to seek for significant correlations among the two kinds of teacher knowledge and its components: mathematical teacher content knowledge (Type 1, 2 and 3) and teacher “knowing-to act”. For instance, Mason and Spence (1998) recognized the situation of when a student asks if the answer or steps are correct is a situation where the “knowing-to act” of the teacher can be enacted.

Expected Outcomes

The analysis showed that there is no significant correlation between teacher content knowledge measured as the total score on the TCKS and “knowing-to act” measured by KtAS score (Pearson’s r(64)=.17, p>.05). It indicates that the teachers’ performance on the TCKS is not related to their “knowing-to act” ability. The correlational analysis between cognitive type T1 and KtAS is not significant (Pearson’s r(64)=.13, p>.05). This adds to the discussion that the actions enacted by teachers during mathematics instruction are not related to their knowledge of facts and procedures. The correlation analysis between cognitive type 2 and the KtAS score is no significant correlation between T2 and KtAS (Pearson’s r(64)=.0001, p>.05). The last correlational analysis examined was between T3 and KtAS. The results for this last comparison unexpectedly reported a significant correlation between T3 and KtAS (r(64)=.27, p<.05). This means that there is a relationship between the knowledge of models and generalizations, and the actions enacted by teachers during mathematics instructions. This result adds to the discussion that teachers who possess the mathematical knowledge that allows generating and testing conjectures, making generalizations, and proving theorems, among other aspects has more possibility of knowing-to act in the moment. It is important to highlight that in order to be able to generate conjectures and testing them, certain procedural and conceptual knowledge must be possessed. Analyzing this result, the “knowing-to act” ability appears when knowledge is called in the moment required. If there is no knowledge to be called, “knowing-to act” might not be enacted. According to Mason and Spence (1999), “knowing-to act” at the moment requires more than content knowledge, but this means that at least some content knowledge is essential. Therefore, there are more possibilities of “knowing-to act” when teachers hold knowledge of models and generalizations.

References

Mason, J. & Spence, M. 1998, Towards a Psychology of Knowing-To, in C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.) Teaching Mathematics in New Times: Proceedings of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia 21, 1, (pp. 342-349). Gold Coast, Sydney: MERGA. Mason, J. and Spence, M.(1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1), 135-161. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., and Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 8(3), 255-281. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,15(2), 4-14. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Rewiew, 57(1), 1-22. Tchoshanov, M., Lesser, L., & Salazar, J. (2008). Teacher knowledge and student achievement: Reveling patters. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 13, 39-49. Tchoshanov, M. (2011). Relationship between teacher knowledge of concepts and connections, teaching practice, and student achievement in middle grades mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 141-164. Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics, (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Retrieved on April 17, 2013 from: http://teds.educ.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/IEA_TEDS-M-International-Report1.pdf

Author Information

Maria D. Cruz (presenting / submitting)
Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Humanidades
Ciudad Juárez
University of Texas at El Paso
University of Texas at El Paso
Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
New Mexico State University

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.