Evidence-based Teaching and Teacher Agency: Initial Teacher Education Students' Conceptions
Author(s):
Carey Philpott (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 08 C, Paradigms, Agency and Knowledge

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
09:00-10:30
Room:
NM-C214
Chair:
Rachel Shanks

Contribution

Internationally there has been a recent resurgence of interest in teacher education models based on evidence-based teaching.  These models take a variety of forms.  They include: clinical models of teacher education (Alter & Coggeshall 2009; Grossman 2010; NCATE 2010; Burn & Mutton 2013; Conroy, Hulme & Menter 2013; McLean-Davies et al 2013; DfE 2015a).; instructional rounds (City et al 2009) and teacher rounds (Del Prete 2013); and professional learning communities (PLCs) (e.g. Stoll et al 2006).  There is also increasing interest in translational research in teaching in schools, exploring how educational research findings can be translated into practice. 

At the same time there has been an international increase in research and theorisation of teachers’ agency in relation to professional learning, particularly across Europe (e.g  Sannino 2010; Reeves & I’Anson 2014; Pyhältö, Pietarinen & Soini 2015; Toom, Pyhältö & Rust 2015).  Questions can be asked about the relationship between evidence-based teaching and teachers’ agency, both in terms of the nature and scope of professional learning and in terms of the authority that teachers have within systems of schooling. 

Some commentators have argued that evidence-based teaching provides an important opportunity for teachers to exercise agency and enhance their authority (Goldacre 2013).  However, at the same time dissenting voices have critiqued professional development models such as instructional rounds and PLCs for focusing too narrowly on the efficient implementation of prescribed teaching techniques rather than broader social questions about schools and schooling (Servage, 2008, 2009: Bottery 2003).  Others have criticised evidence based-practice, including evidence-based teaching, for obscuring the ideological nature of decisions about social practices like teaching behind an illusion of neutrality (Kirmayer 2012; Lee, Fitzpatrick & Baik 2013; Biesta 2010). Such critiques also suggest that, rather than serving as an affordance for teachers’ agency, evidence-based teaching could provide a constraint.  This debate, in part, turns on how we define evidence-based practice and what seems to be clear is that not everybody advocating evidence-based teaching is calling for the same thing.

This paper reports on research into initial teacher education (ITE) students’ conceptions of evidence-based teaching as they near the end of their ITE courses.  The research reported here forms part of a larger project into students’ experiences and understandings of evidence-based teaching in ITE.

Method

The students participated in a survey designed to elicit their thoughts about the nature of evidence-based teaching. The student sample was drawn from several courses in one university in England (n=100). These were a three year undergraduate primary ITE course and two one year postgraduate ITE courses (one primary education and one secondary education). The one year postgraduate courses included students following a university based model and students following a school-based model.

Expected Outcomes

This paper analyses the responses from the survey to explore how nearly qualified teachers understand the idea of evidence-based teaching. It also explores possible relationships to some of the variables in ITE experienced by these students (e.g. school based and university based, undergraduate and postgraduate) and selected biographical details (e.g. the previous subject discipline of postgraduate students). The significance of this research is that, to some extent, how newly qualified teachers conceptualise evidence-based teaching may influence the nature of their engagement with it and, therefore, the extent to which it provides an affordance for teacher agency (Biesta, Priestley & Robinson 2015). In addition, the survey responses reflect the influence that their ITE experiences (both university and school based) have had on their conception of evidence-based teaching. The discussion of results will focus on students’ conceptions in relation to questions such as: • What is meant by the term “evidence-based teaching”? • What counts as evidence in evidence-based teaching? • How is the evidence produced? • Who produces the evidence? • How is the evidence evaluated? • Who evaluates the evidence?

References

Alter, J. and Coggshall, J.G. (2009) Teaching as a Clinical Profession: Implications for Teacher Preparation and State Policy Biesta, G.J.J. (2010) Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: from evidence-based education to value-based education, Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 29, 491-503 Bottery, M. (2003) The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness, School Leadership and Management, 23 (2), 187-208 Burn, K and Mutton, T (2013) Review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in initial teacher education, BERA, City, E.A., Elmore, R.F., Fiarman, S.E, and Teitel, L. (2009) Instructional Rounds in Education; a network approach to improving teaching and learning, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press Conroy, J., Hulme, M. and Menter, I. (2013) Developing a ‘clinical’ model for teacher education, Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 39 (5), 557-573 Del Prete, T. (2013) Teacher Rounds; A Guide to Collaborative Learning in and from Practice, Thousand Oaks: Corwin DfE (2015a) Carter Review of Initial Teacher Education, London: DfE Goldacre, B. (2013) Building Evidence into Education, retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/news/building-evidence-into-education Grossman, P. (2010) Learning to Practice: The Design of Clinical Experience in Teacher Preparation, retrieved from: http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/Clinical_Experience_-_Pam_Grossman.pdf Kirmayer, L.J. (2012) Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health: Epistemic communities and the politics of pluralism, Social Science and Medicine, 75, 249-256 Lee, H., Fitzpatrick, J.J. and Baik, S-Y (2013) Why isn’t evidence based practice improving healthcare for minorities in the United States? Applied Nursing Research, 26, 263-268 McLean Davies, L., Anderson, M., Deans, J., Dinham, S., Griffin, P., Kameniar, B.. Page, J., Reid, C., Rickards, F., Taylor, C. and Tyler, D. (2013) Masterly preparation: embedding clinical practice in a graduate pre-service teacher education programme, Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 39 (1), 93-106 NCATE (2010) Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: a national strategy to prepare effective teachers, Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J. and Soini, T. (2015) Teachers’ professional agency and learning – from adaption to active modification in the teacher community, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 21 (7), 811-830 Servage, L. (2008) Critical and transformative practices in professional learning communities, Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter 2008, 63-77 Stoll , L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M. and Thomas, S. (2006) Professional learning communities: a review of the literature, Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258

Author Information

Carey Philpott (presenting / submitting)
Leeds Beckett University
School of Education and Childhood
Leeds

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.