17 SES 11, 1916-2016 - “Education and Democracy” for a Democratic Learning Space (Part 2)
Symposium continued from 17 SES 10
Physical spaces of education have a complex, dynamic relationship with the activities that take place in them. Quality of environment correlates with student outcomes, but the evidence points to complex chains of influence, as opposed to direct impact on learning (Woolner et al., 2007). As Briggs notes 'the physical environment is a visible sign of the school's culture' (Briggs, 2001: 176) and the ethos of the school affects the way space is engaged with, organised and used (Uline et al., 2009). Thus a new school building, replacing a degraded dated building, has the potential to be a catalyst for other educational changes, enhancing morale and changing attitudes, but this is not a certainty. Research within education consistently suggests the importance of participation in change processes, with more successful change occurring when school staff and students are actively involved in planning and enacting the change (Ouston et al., 1991; Flutter & Rudduck, 2004). This idea has parallels with participatory practices in planning, architecture and design (Woolner, 2015) that are clearly of particular relevance to school re-building (Parnell et al., 2008). Such beliefs about the benefits of participation were key to the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme, initiated in 2003, but discontinued in 2010, amid criticism from the James Review (2011) that participation is expensive and inefficient. This paper reports the initial stage of research that will follow an English secondary school (students aged 13-18) through a re-build under the Priority School Building Programme (PSBP), which replaced BSF. The focus is on the students’ existing attitudes to learning, their expectations of the new building and their involvement in the change process. Data was collected through focus groups and a questionnaire that includes questions from a survey of student attitudes used before and after a secondary school rebuild (Rudd et al. 2008). This enables comparisons with the changes in student attitudes found by research that took place in the context of a BSF rebuild. The extent of student involvement in this rebuild will be assessed using the ‘climbing frame of participation’ (Singer & Woolner, 2015: 196). Implications for democratic processes within the new school will be considered.
Briggs, A. (2001) Managing the Learning Environment In D. Middlewood and N.Burton (eds) Managing the Curriculum. London: Sage. Flutter, J. and J. Rudduck (2004). Consulting Pupils: What's in it for Schools? London, Routledge Falmer. James, S. (2011) Review of Education Capital. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-education-capital (accessed 3.12.15) Ouston, J., Maughan, B. and Rutter, M. (1991) Can Schools Change? II: Practice in Six London Secondary Schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2(1): 3-13 Parnell, R., Cave, V. and Torrington, J (2008) School design: opportunities through collaboration CoDesign, 4, 4, 211-224 Rudd, P., Reed, F. and Smith, P. (2008). The Effects of the School Environment on Young People's Attitudes to Education and Learning. Slough, NFER. Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & De Vere Wolsey, T. (2009). The walls still speak: The stories occupants tell. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 400–426. Singer, J. and Woolner, P. (2014) Exchanging Ideas for the Ever-Changing School In P.Woolner (Ed) School Design Together. Abingdon: Routledge Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., Wall, K. (2007) A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47-70.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.