17 SES 11, 1916-2016 - “Education and Democracy” for a Democratic Learning Space (Part 2)
Symposium continued from 17 SES 10
The democratization of the learning space has to start with a change in the architectural design methods, where the architect must look for his social role in parallel with his artistic or technical ones (Moniz, 2008; Bandeirinha, Allegretti, & Moniz, 2010). This paper presents the research developed with architecture students to develop their capacity of working with participatory design methods (Woolner, 2014), namely when transforming the public facilities built by the Portuguese authoritarian regime between 1926 and 1974. In facto, the Portuguese regime built a network of facilities to educate the citizens from primary schools to universities. These buildings were designed for educational plans related to important reforms in different periods of the authoritarian regime controlled by António Oliveira Salazar (1932-1969) and by Marcelo Caetano (1969-1974). Throughout these years the regime changed and the educational spaces also changed integrating new ideas and forms of pedagogical proposals and architectural movements. The first years of the regime were still very opened to modern ideas, where Dewey was quoted, but in 1939, with the Second World War, fascism became dominant and the architecture adopted a classical style and a rigid organization. The pedagogy was controlled by the “Mocidade Portuguesa”, the Portuguese paramilitary youth organization for students from 7 to 14 years old. After 1974, these schools continued to work and to educate the youth under a democratic orientation but with a learning space designed for a fascist one. What can we do to change this authoritarian paradigm into a democratic one? This is the challenge we proposed to architecture students of University of Coimbra and also to the pupils and teachers of the “Rua do Sol” Primary School, built in Porto in the 50s. To face this problem, students developed a participatory process in the Architectural Design Studio in articulation with the course of Geography and of Anthropology because the school has a strong relation with urban context and with the community around it. The students projects followed Dewey ideas looking for a learning space focused on the pupils to enable an education by experience (Dewey, 1916). These ideas are also framed by Hertzberger (2008) architectural proposal, namely the association between urban spaces and informal learning spaces as “Learning street” and “Learning Square”, where the school is like a city (Moniz & Ferreira, 2016) This paper presents the proposals for “Rua do Sol” School aiming to contribute to the design methods debate.
Bandeirinha, J. A., Allegretti, G., & Moniz, G. C. (2010). Debate social e construção do território. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, (91), 5–8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan company. Hertzberger, H. (2008). Herman Hertzberger: Space and Learning. Rotterdam: 010 Uitgeverij. Moniz, G. C. (2008). The Portuguese «May 68»: Politics, Education and Architecture. European Journal of American Studies, (Vol 3, No 2). http://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.7253 Moniz, G. C., & Ferreira, C. (2016). The school as a city and a city as a school: Future architectural scenarios for the school. In Ulrike Stadler-Altmann (org.), Lernumgebungen Erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf Schulgebäude und Klassenzimmer (pp. 125–137). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. Woolner, P. (2014). School Design Together. Routledge.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.