28 SES 01, The Fluidity of Europeanization of Education
In the field of education, recent research findings show that knowledge is power, and that in order to embed in policies, it must materialize in metrics (Grek, 2009; Normand, 2016). At the same time, in political sciences, it has been proven that “ideas” find a material existence and become “instruments” for public action (Lascoumes and Le Galès, 2005). Some other actors exert a growing influence like think tanks, knowledge networks and advocacy networks, both in the production of knowledge and ‘agenda making’ (Ball, 2012; Stone ; 2013; Normand, 2016).
Capitalizing on such research, we will present some characteristics of new politics of education across Europe and at the global level. We will explain the emergence, dissemination and translation of the concept of “soft skills” within educational policies, which crosses education, lifelong learning and employment policies. Our goal is to disentangle complex roles of actors (public ones such as decision makers, educators and experts, and private ones such as philanthropy actors and entrepreneurs) and macro-actors (institutions such as national States, international organizations, think tanks, private companies…) to qualify theirs relationships in the production of knowledge and the shaping of European education. After mapping such dynamics at the global and European level, we study their impact on educational policies at a more local level, taking the case of France.
This contribution differs from previous studies as it questions the structuring of a new epistemic governance both through its cognitive and instrumental dimensions. First, cognitive approach is mobilized though the study of a new “cognitive motive” (Benamouzig, 2005) called “soft skills” and its transfer, borrowing and dissemination into educational public policies (Steiner-Khamsi and Waldow, 2013). Secondly, we study the role of various actors in the making of evidence-based technologies, instruments and measurement tools, and question the way they produce cognitive categories in shifting educational frameworks and policies. We wish here to add on existing literature on how knowledge comes to gain a materiality and get embodied in policies. Acknowledging the diversification of “standardizers” (Brunsson, 2012), networks and a wide range of private actors come here under close scrutiny, as well as international organizations. As do fruitful recent research (Landri, 2016), our work shall also develop some insights from the Sociology of Science and Technology (SST), more particularly from the Actor-Network Theory and its conceptual framework (Callon, 1986 ; Latour, 1988).
Ball, Stephen J. Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2012. Dolowitz, David P., D.Marsh. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13, no. 1 (January 2000): 5–23. Fenwick, T., and Richard Edwards. Actor-network theory and education.Routledge London, 2010. Grek S.,“Governing by Numbers : the PISA Effect”, Journal of Education Policy, 24 (1), pp.23-37. 2009. Grek, S. (2013). Expert moves: international comparative testing and the rise of expertocracy. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 695-709. Hadjiisky M., Leslie A. Pal, Christopher Walker, eds., The Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects of Policy Transfers: Beg, Borrow, Steal or Swallow?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming, 2016 Jacobsson, B. Standardization and expert knowledge. In Brunsson, N., and Jacobsson, B. A world of standards (pp. 40-49). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Landri, P. “Standards and standardization in the European politics of education”, in Normand, Romuald, and Jean-Louis Derouet, A European Politics of Education: Perspectives from Sociology, Policy Studies and Politics. Studies in European Education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016. Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21. Lawn, M., & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European Policy Space in Educational Governance: the role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290-307. Lawn, M., and R. Normand. Shaping of European Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Routledge, 2014. Normand, Romuald. The Changing Epistemic Governance of European Education: The Fabrication of the Homo Academicus Europeanus?, Springer, 2016. Ozga, J., and R. Jones. “Travelling and Embedded Policy: The Case of Knowledge Transfer.” Journal of Education Policy, Routledge, 21, no. 1 (January 2006). Radaelli, Claudio M. “Europeanization, Policy Learning, and New Modes of Governance.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10, no. 3 (September 2008): 239–54. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710-725. Steiner-Khamsi, Gita, and Florian Waldow. World Yearbook of Education 2012: Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education, 2013. Stone, D. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.