Session Information
19 SES 10 A, Young People, Voice and Resistance in Schools
Paper Session
Contribution
Michel Foucault claimed that wherever there is power, there is resistance. This is of particular importance if we look at school as a place where, apart from enslavement and oppression, there is resistance, defiance and opposition. This vision of school is typical for critical pedagogy which views school as a place of enslavement and emancipation, as an arena of a struggle for dominant meanings, symbols and values. The category of a ritual, especially of a ritual of resistance, is helpful in validating such a vision. The ritual category is part of the school reality. McLaren (1994, p. 6) writes: school serves as a rich storage of ritual systems: rituals play a crucial and unerasable role in the whole student existence and different dimensions of the process are appropriate for the events and everyday institutional matters as well as the weft and warp of the school culture. On the one hand, the ritual is a tool for maintaining social order but on the other hand, it is a basic factor for changing the existing order. Victor Turner, Peter McLaren i Chistoph Wulf (2010) have given particular attention to the dualism of the ritual in their works.
Bobby C. Aleksander (1997) indicates that perceiving the ritual as a guardian of social order can be found in the works of Edward B. Tylor, James G. Frazer, Émile Durkheim, Arnold van Gennep, Bronisław Malinowski and Alfred R. Radcliffe-Brown. According to Bronisław Malinowski (Rajewski, 2006), the role of the ritual is to establish, show and forecast permanent attitudes and obligations. Its main task is to lower anxiety in a group through symbolic acts of recreating the existing structures. In this sense, the ritual is a binder of the group which affects its members’ solidarity. It is connected with a serious sphere of sacrum and profanum reality(Babicka-Wirkus, 2015).
Perceiving the ritual as a tool for a social change enables to show the dynamics of school functioning and thus changes of its normative systems. Victor Turner (2006) revealed the performative dimension of the ritual by putting it in the category of social drama, i.e. ritual conflict resolution. According to John McKenzie (2011), in the theatre of everyday life, all actors play their role and wear costumes of some specified function. This state of affairs is extremely important in the process of maintaining and changing social relationships.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alexander B. C. (1997), Ritual and Current Studies of Ritual: Overview, [in:] S. D. Glazier (ed.), Athropology of Religion. A Handbook, , Westpol, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press. Arendt H. (1999), O przemocy. Nieposłuszeństwo obywatelskie, tłum. A. Łagodzka, W. Madeja. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia. Babicka-Wirkus A. (2015), Uczeń (nie)biega i (nie) krzyczy. Rytuały oporu jako przejaw autoekspresji młodzieży, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków. Czerepaniak-Walczak M. (2006), Pedagogika emancypacyjna. Rozwój świadomości krytycznej człowieka. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Habermas J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Trans. T. A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. Habermas J. (1987), Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Trans. T. A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. J. KcKenzie, (2001), Perform or Else: from discipline to Performance, Routledge, London – New York. Leach E., Greimas A. J. (1989), Rytuał i narracja, tłum. M. Buchowski, A. Grzegorczyk, E. Umińska-Plisenko, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. McLaren P. (1991), Rytualne wymiary oporu – błaznowanie i symboliczna inwersja, [w:] Z. Kwieciński (red.), Nieobecne Dyskursy, cz. I, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. McLaren P. (1994), Edukacja jako system kulturowy, [in:] Z. Kwieciński (ed.), Nieobecne dyskursy, cz. IV, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. McLaren P. (1999), Schooling as a Ritual Performance. Toward Political Economy of Educational Symbols and Gestures. Third Edition, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. McLaren, P. (2014). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education, Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers. Rajewski M. (2006), Badania rytuału w antropologii brytyjskiej, [w:] M. Filipiak, M. Rajewski (red.), Rytuał: przeszłość i teraźniejszość, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Rothenbuhler E. W. (1998), Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE. Scott J. C. (1985), Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University. Turner V. (1970), The Forest of Symbols. Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Ithaca, London: Cornel University Press. Wulf Ch. and others, (2010), Ritual and Identity; The staging and performing of rituals In the lives of young people, trans. A. Lagaay, E. Hamilton, London: The Tufnell Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.