Professional Body Orientations In Physical Education Student Teachers’ Professional Identity
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

18 SES 08, Developing Teachers Professional Identity: The contemporary physical education teacher

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
09:00-10:30
Room:
K3.23
Chair:
Paula Batista

Contribution

General description

 

“Yeah, the body matters, especially a good-looking body.”

—Steven, age 29, physical education student teacher

 

The above extract from the research data summarizes some of the history and meaning of the body in physical education (PE). The body is an important part of PE teacher professional identity because it is always present during teaching. The normative PE teacher body has been thin, muscular and strong; the dominant attitude towards the body in PE and PETE (PE teacher education) has been instrumental, separating the mind from the body (Tinning 2010). Several studies have been performed on PE and the body, but there is a lack of research about the body’s role in PE teacher professional identity. In this study, we aim to understand PE teachers’ conceptions of the body and their relation to professional identity.

 

The professional identities of PE student teachers as well as educators of PE teachers have traditionally centred on sports knowledge and skills rather than broader educational issues (Dowling 2006, 2011). Physical performance and mastery of specific sports are valued over critical thinking and reflective approaches (Capel 2007; Larsson 2009). PE teachers and their educators have a tendency to reproduce and reinforce the current professional culture, identities and attitudes towards their work (Brown & Evans 2004). Body and embodiment have been studied with respect to teacher education (Fisette 2015), PE teachers (Webb, Quennerstedt & Öhman 2008) and PE student teachers (Wrench & Garrett 2015).

 

In theoretical terms, professional identity refers to an individual’s conception of him or herself as a professional subject based on professional and personal history (Eteläpelto, Vähäsantanen, Hökkä & Paloniemi 2014). Professional identity defines the relationship between a person and his or her profession. For teachers, professional identity includes for example professional knowledge, beliefs, values, attitudes, emotions, interests and future aspirations (e.g. Beijaard, Meijer & Verloop 2004). In this study, body is understood as both a sociological and biological phenomenon; it is constructed through various cultural practices on the basis of biological necessity (Shilling 2012).

 

The applicability of the traditional performance-oriented PE teacher identity in contemporary schools has been questioned (e.g. Dowling 2011). The latest Finnish national PE curriculum (Finnish National Agency for Education 2014, to be implemented in autumn 2017) calls for joy, playfulness and enjoyment accompanied by an accepting attitude towards one’s body. In order to support this kind professional identity in PETE, it is important to better understand PE teachers’ notions about the body.

 

The objective of this study is to understand PE teacher professional identity and its formation during PETE by addressing the following specific research questions:

 

  1. How do PE student teachers relate to their bodies?
  2. In what ways does the body become a part of professional identity?

Method

Methods The research participants were 20 PE student teachers (12 women and 8 men) who were conducting their final teaching practice (fourth year) of a master’s degree program in Physical Education in a university in Finland. They participated in a semi-structured interview during the spring term of 2015. The interview questions were informed by the concept of professional identity and included themes such as personal and professional history, aims and basic principles of teaching (e.g. values and goals), gender and body in teaching PE, influential experiences during teacher training and future career aspirations. The data were transcribed and then analysed by applying qualitative thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2006). Five analyst-constructed typologies (Patton 2002) were created based on the above themes. These typologies are henceforth called professional body orientations and reflect the student teachers’ attitudes towards their bodies and the manner in which their bodies become a part of their professional identities. The orientations are abstractions, not referring to any particular student teacher.

Expected Outcomes

Findings The findings revealed five professional body orientations: instrumental, balanced, experimenting, tensional and harmonious. PE teachers with an instrumental orientation view their bodies through the lens of physical appearances, sporting performance and measurements. Teachers are aware of and conform to the professional norms concerning the body (fit, muscular and thin). Physicality (sporty appearance and skilful physical performance) is emphasized in their professional identities. In teachers with a balanced orientation, attitudes towards the body are more accepting. The peer pressures and professional norms related to the body are recognized but not unconditionally followed. A “normal” (neither obese nor excessively thin) body is sufficient for PE teachers. Physicality is an important part of their professional identities, but its significance is related to pedagogical skills and knowledge. The experimenting orientation differs from the balanced primarily in the understanding of motion. Teachers with an experimenting orientation view exercise as a means for openness, creativity and experimentation with different kinds of movement: the body is a tool for learning, and making mistakes is encouraged. The tensional orientation is characterized by a conflict between conforming to and rejecting established body norms. The idea of a “normal” body is distorted by the sporty study environment where everyone seems to be in good shape. In the harmonious orientation, the body is accepted unconditionally. The attitude is gentle and involves “listening” to the body. Aging, overweight and less functional bodies are all considered “normal”. A functioning body is not taken for granted. This study implies that there is substantial diversity in PE student teachers’ relations to their bodies and in the manner in which their bodies become a part of professional identity.

References

References Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, pp. 107–128. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. Brown, D. & Evans, J. (2004). Reproducing gender? Intergenerational links and the male PE teacher as a cultural conduit on teaching physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, pp. 48–70. Capel, S. (2007). Moving beyond physical education subject knowledge to develop knowledgeable teachers of the subject. The Curriculum Journal, 18(4), pp. 493–507. Dowling, F. (2006). Physical education teacher educators’ professional identities, continuing professional development and the issue of gender equality. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), pp. 247–263. Dowling, F. (2011). ‘Are PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism?’ A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students’ emerging professional identities. Sport, Education and Society, 16 (2), pp. 201¬–222. Eteläpelto, A. Vähäsantanen, K. Hökkä, P. & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.) International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 645–672). London: Springer. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet: Opetus vuosiluokilla 7–9. Retrieved from http://oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf Fisette, J. (2015). The stigmatized physical educator. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(4), pp. 466–487. Larsson, L. (2009). Idrott – och helst lite mer idrott: Idrottslärarstudenters möte med utbildningen. Stockholms universitetet. Stockholm: Institutionen för utbildninsvetenskap med inrikting mot tekniska, estetiska och praktiska kunskapstraditioner. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & Evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE. Shilling, C. (2012). The Body and Social Theory. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE. Tinning, R. (2010). Pedagogy and Human Movement. Theory, practice, research. London: Routledge. Webb, L., Quennerstedt, M. & Öhman, M. (2008). Healthy bodies: construction of the body and health in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 13(4), pp. 353–372. Wrench, A. & Garrett, R. (2015). PE: it’s just me: physically active and healthy teacher bodies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(1), pp. 72–91.

Author Information

Jukka Virta (presenting / submitting)
University of Jyväskylä
Department of Teacher Education
Jyväskylä
University of Jyväskylä, Finland
University of Jyväskylä, Finland
University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.