The Voice Of Adolescents At The Edge Of Schooling: An Ethnographic Approach
Author(s):
Maria Iacovou Charalambous (presenting / submitting) Helen Phtiaka
Conference:
ECER 2017
Network:
Format:
Paper

Session Information

19 SES 10 A, Young People, Voice and Resistance in Schools

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
15:30-17:00
Room:
K4.12
Chair:
Juana M. Sancho-Gil

Contribution

Low school attendance and truancy have been widely discussed phenomena in the educational world over time (McCormack 2005). These phenomena cause great concern to many countries, due to their serious social and economic consequences. OECD has described truancy as being expensive, since a non-attender is more likely to become and remain a burden to a country’s benefit system than a successful student (Traag & Van der Velden, 2011).

 

According to Lever (2011), truancy falls into three distinct categories: wanton truancy, truancy due to school phobia and condoned truancy. Wanton truancy is when a student does not want to attend school because they have found something ‘better to do’ with their time. School phobia is when a student has anxiety issues like panic attacks when he/she is asked to go to school, and condoned truancy is when parents, even though the child may be perfectly happy at school (Reid 1999), encourage their child not to attend school.

 

Zyngier (2011), in his review of current research into programs aimed at ‘at-risk’ students, identifies three standpoints, characterized as instrumentalist, social constructivist and critical transformative. Instrumentalist views are linked to materialistic approaches, thus intervention programs which fall under this category focus on the individual vulnerability and the psycho-pathological deficits of ‘at-risk’ students. Typical of the social constructivist approach is the call for school reform and effectiveness. Sadly, such approaches often catalyse the publication of examination results (Mortimore & Mortimore, in Zyngier, 2011) and truancy rates (Barton, 1997). These perpetuate the disproportionate enrolments of ‘at-risk’ students in certain schools, thus creating a culture of disadvantage (Zyngier, 2011; Saltmarsh & Youdell, 2004), as it is often the case with Technical and Vocational Schools, both in Cyprus (Symeou & Efthymiou, 2004) as well as in other European countries such as Spain (García‐Gracia, 2008). The third standpoint, critical transformative or empowering, seeks to develop student’s knowledge of their world and their ability to act within it. This approach considers, as one of its most basic tenets, the engagement with young people by listening to them. During this process, the connectedness between students and teachers is essential, as well as the ability of the teacher to listen and value the students’ voice (Lamnias, 1999). 

 

The research under discussion is currently conducted in a mainstream secondary Technical and Vocational school in Cyprus and has been designed to follow a qualitative, ethnographic approach to studying truancy. The purpose of the research is to unravel the standpoints and voices of a commonly marginalised and excluded group of students, in a commonly marginalised type of school in the Cypriot society. Privileging the point of view of the least advantaged students, through their critique and participation, not only has the ability to empower students with low attendance, but at the same time, as an objective, can raise critical awareness concerning the role of the educational context on the creation of truancy and ‘at-risk’ students.

 

Critical Pedagogy (Giroux, 2011) and Social Exchange Theory (Miller, 2013) are the theoretical models which are used to frame the research design and questions. The research questions which are, accordingly, attempted to be answered are:

  1. How do students with low attendance define and structure their school experience?
  2. How do students describe the processes which operate within the school which push them out of class/school?
  3. How do students calculate their decision to stay out of class/school and what are, for them, the costs and benefits of their decision to stay out?
  4. How do students with low attendance define the patterns of resistance they employ to resist the hegemony of the dominant order in the school?

Method

The research, which has started in September 2015, has been designed to follow a qualitative, ethnographic approach. The researcher-ethnographer has been working in the specific school as a Physics teacher for the last five years. During the first year the researcher immersed herself as participant in students’ daily lives in and out of school (both boys and girls), giving importance to the way in which the participants interpret their actions, as well as to the specific contexts in which these actions occur (Greig & Taylor, 1999). During the second year of fieldwork, the researcher has converged to a class of ten girls for whom she has been a form teacher for the last two school years. Research methodology involves non-participant and participant observation, interviews (formal and informal, semi-structured and unstructured) and the study of artefacts (Hammersley, 2014). Observation sheets and a researcher’s diary are used for the collection of fieldwork data. A social anthropological approach is used to analyse the data, and more specifically, context analysis (data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing/verification) (Miles & Huberman, 1994). Data collected from different sources is triangulated during analysis (Graue & Walsh, 1998). An important dilemma the researcher has come up against concerned pilot studies. Piloting is considered to be critical, since it can alert the researcher as to whether the research questions, approaches and methods are specific, ethical and doable (Roberts-Holmes, 2005). However, this temporary character of piloting (and sometimes of the participation of certain individuals), did not seem to resonate well with the researcher’s ethical standpoint that although convergence and selectivity are endemic to data collection (Miles & Huberman, 1994), it would be wrong to eliminate the initial contributions of participants in the pilot study simply by ‘starting fresh’ with new participants, especially since these participants seemed enthusiastic about further contributing to this research. The preliminary nature of pilot studies suggests that the initial ethnographic encounters of the researcher and the participants of the pilot study can be erased, whereas the researcher can arrogantly move on with a calibrated approach to be thrown on other participants. Instead, since researcher-participant familiarity is a crucial factor in ethnographic research (Phtiaka, 1997), pilot studies could be seen as a first step in the development of a close relationship and understanding between the researcher and the participants. Pilot studies could thus be treated as an inextricable and continuous element of calibration during research.

Expected Outcomes

The presence of culturally motivated truancy has been expected to be present, due to the fact that many of the students come from families with low socioeconomic background. These students often have to skip classes or be absent from school in order to work and/or support their families (e.g. girls having to stay at home to babysit their siblings). As expected, during their initial discussions with the researcher some of the participants had to be told that their voices are worth listening to and that their voices can bring about meaningful changes in their everyday school experiences. In the Cypriot educational context the students who attend vocational schools are adolescents who have been typically negatively labeled in their earlier school years and sadly, these are students that now have to be convinced that they have the right to be listened to. In addition, preliminary findings seem to repeatedly highlight the following: the student’s feeling of ‘freedom’ from troubles when they skip classes (where ‘troubles’ for them are often personified into boring teachers and/or their strict parents) and the student’s anger against specific teachers whom ‘they cannot stand or understand’, thus they decide to skip their classes. This seems to be related to the fact that they repeatedly express the meaninglessness of staying in class. Students’ academic goals also seem to be limited and for them, achievement equals to leapfrogging over more advantaged students (Mortimore & Mortimore, 1999, in Zyngier, 2011). The realisation that they cannot leapfrog thus seems to develop a feeling of purposelessness in the value of schooling. Attempting to raise critical awareness first and foremost on their part, as well as on the part of the researcher and other stakeholders, is what will hopefully be attempted to be achieved.

References

Barton, L. (1997) Inclusive education: romantic, subversive or realistic?, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(3), pp. 231-242. García‐Gracia, M. (2008) Role of secondary schools in the face of student absenteeism: a study of schools in socially underprivileged areas, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(3), pp. 263-280. Giroux, H. (2011) On Critical Pedagogy. New York: Continuum. Graue, M.E. & Walsh, D.J. (1998) Studying Children in Context: Theories, Methods, and Ethics. London: Sage. Greig, A. & Taylor, J. (1999) Doing research with Children. London: Sage. Hammersley, M. (2014) Research Design. In Clark, A. Flewitt, R., Hammersley, M. & Robb, M. (Eds) Understanding Research with Children and Young People, London: Sage Lamnias, K. (1999) Modernity: Forms of logic and influences in the process of formation of school knowledge. Pedagogical Review. Thessaloniki: Kyriakides [in Greek]. Lever, C. (2011) Understanding Challenging Behaviour in Inclusive Classrooms. Pearson Education. Available via: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9781408248287/startPage/8 [27/1/2015]. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California: Sage Publications. Miller, S. P. (2013). Social exchange theory. Salem Press Encyclopedia. Montgomery, H. (2014) Participant Observation. In Clark, A. Flewitt, R., Hammersley, M. & Robb, M. (Eds) Understanding Research with Children and Young People, London: Sage. Phtiaka, H. (1997) Special Kids for Special Treatment? How special do you need to be to find yourself in a special school? London: Falmer Press. Reid, K. (1999) Truancy And Schools, London: Routledge. Roberts-Holmes, G. (2005) Doing your early years research project. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Saltmarsh, S. & Youdell, D. (2004) ‘Special sport’ for misfits and losers: educational triage and the construction of school subjectivities, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(4), pp. 353-371. Symeou, L. & Efthymiou, E. (2004) Research concerning the attitudes of students attending Technical Schools, about their schools. Cyprus Pedagogical Institute Bulletin, 5, pp. 9-11 [in Greek]. Traag, T. & Van der Velden, K. W. (2011) Early School Leaving in the Netherlands: the role of family resources, school composition and background characteristics in early school-leaving in lower secondary education. Irish Educational Studies, 30 (1), pp. 45-62. Zyngier, D. (2011) (Re)conceptualising risk: left numb and unengaged and lost in a no-man’s-land or what (seems to) work for at-risk students, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(2), pp. 211-231.

Author Information

Maria Iacovou Charalambous (presenting / submitting)
University of Cyprus
Department of Education
Nicosia
University of Cyprus, Cyprus

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.