Fostering Enabling Dialogues in Professional Practice
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 06 E, Dialogue and Professionalism in Teaching and Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
15:30-17:00
Room:
K5.02
Chair:
Marit Ulvik

Contribution

This presentation examines how the use of a descriptive observation tool mediates mentor teachers' post-lesson conversations with a preservice teacher. Our main interest was to investigate the effects of the use of evidence-informed records in combination with a dialogic approach. We used a qualitative research design to investigate how mentor teachers and teacher educators used the tool, and what effects the tool had on their dispositions towards feedback. The provision of feedback plays an essential role in the clinical model of teaching and encourages the pre-service teacher (PST) to develop as a reflective professional during field experience. In this project, feedback was facilitated through the use of a descriptive lesson observation tool that mentor teachers complete during the lesson and used as a basis for a post-lesson conversation with the PST. By introducing a third observer, a three way professional dialogue was facilitated between the PST delivering the lesson, a peer and the mentor teacher. We called this the Collaborative Approach to Observation (CATO). The additional observer in the lesson enabled a deeper post-lesson conversation through a round table discussion. We found that the presence of both the mentor and peer, during the lesson observation, provided multiple perspectives of the lesson, resulting in much richer post-lesson professional dialogue, and provided opportunities for professional growth for all three participants.

Method

The project uses an interpretivist case study approach. The research used a multiple-methods approach of data collection.Three methods of data collection were used to draw on the perspectives of participants: • participant observations of post-lesson professional conversations; • surveys completed by MTs and PSTs; and • interviews with focus groups comprising TFs and CSs.

Expected Outcomes

This project has designed an interactive tool that can create space for participants to develop dialogue about their pedagogical practice which has strengthened PST’s reflective practice. The main areas on which evidence of practice is collected focuses on teaching and learning: what the teacher is saying, doing, making and writing and what the students in the class are saying, doing, making and writing. This evidence is highly beneficial to the development of these beginning teachers as it asks them to focus on processes of teaching and equally on student learning.

References

City, E. A., Elmore, R., Fiarman, S., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education : a network approach to improving teaching and learning. Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press. Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: A Relational Turn. London: Springer. Edwards, A., & Westgate, D. P. G. (2005). Investigating Classroom Talk: Taylor & Francis. Strong, M., & Baron, W. (2004). An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 47-57. Kriewaldt, J., & Turnidge, D. (2013). Conceptualising an approach to clinical reasoning in the education profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 102-115. doi:10.14221/ajte.2013v38n6.9 Kriewaldt, J., McLean Davies, L., Rice, S., Rickards, F., Acquaro, D., (in press). Clinical Practice in Education: Towards a Conceptual Framework in M. Peters, B. Cowie, I. Menter (Eds), 2017 A Companion to Research in Teacher Education. Springer Academic Publishers. Timperley, H. (2001). Mentoring conversations designed to promote teacher learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education., 29, 111-123. van Kruiningen, J. F. (2013). Educational design as conversation: A conversation analytical perspective on teacher dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 110-121.

Author Information

Sally Windsor (presenting / submitting)
University of Gothenburg
Institutionen för didaktik och pedagogisk profession
Göteborg
Melbourne University, Australia
Melbourne University, Australia
Koonung Secondary College, Melbourne, Australia

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.