Main Content
Session Information
05 SES 13, Regulating Schools in Areas of Poverty and Disadvantage: Policy, representation and support.
Symposium
Contribution
In anglophone countries, high stakes accountability has put schools serving disadvantaged communities (SSDCs) under enormous pressure, with serious side effects within schools. However, by asking schools to make sure that all students succeed in schools, they have also created an environment in which the challenging context is recognized, though the attention is refocused from the (alleged) deficits of the students to the school’s responsibility to help these students succeed no matter what (e.g. Duke, 2012). Unlike that, Germany has a data-based governance agenda but with no high stakes elements (Kotthoff, Böttcher & Nikel, 2016). Even though the data agenda is aimed at improving the organizational “fit” of schools with their environments, it was neither specifically aimed at those schools with the highest improvement needs nor did it compel SSDCs to reassess basic assumptions towards their students, or emphasize the schools’ responsibility to facilitate these students’ right to good education. Test and inspection data is linked to the composition of the student body, which, however, is mainly discussed as influencing factor. This may send the message that it is okay for SSDCs to externalize failures and “delegate” the responsibility to the community. In addition, only a few of the German states offer financial support for SSDCs (Weishaupt, 2016) – though in a rather unsystematic way. There are hardly any programs that would help SSDCs reassess their organization, and recognize – and overcome – a “toxic” organizational culture (Gu & Johansson, 2013) and deficit thinking that may hinder organizational improvement. Accordingly, one might argue that the German low stakes environment gives SSDCs neither an urgent reason nor enough support to reassess their stance towards the students they are serving. We present data from principal (n=36), teacher (n=1,023) and student (n=2,938) questionnaires of the research and development project Developing Potentials – Empowering Schools. The data indicate (1) an association between the composition of the student body and the deficit framework of teachers, (2) an association between the deficit framework and the perceived self-efficacy and group-related stress, and (3) an association between the deficit framework of teachers and the motivation of students. The results suggest that data alone in the low accountability environment does not encourage SSDCs to reassess their deficit frameworks. Working with the schools, however, indicates that specific support for the schools can help them use data to reconsider their perspective, overcome their “toxic” organizational culture and deal with challenges constructively.
References
Duke, D. L. (2012) Tinkering and Turnarounds: Understanding The Contemporary Campaign To Improve Low-Performing Schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17(1-2), 9-24. Gu, Q. & Johansson, O. (2013) Sustaining School Performance. School Contexts Matter. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(3), 301-326. Kotthoff, H.-G., Böttcher, W. & Nikel, J. (2016) Die "Schulinspektion" zwischen Wirkungshoffnungen und Wirksamkeit. In H. Altrichter & K. Maag Merki (Hrsg.), Handbuch Neue Steuerung im Schulsystem (2nd ed., S. 325–360). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Weishaupt, H. (2016) Schulen in schwieriger Lage und Schulfinanzierung. Die Deutsche Schule, 108(4), 354-369.
Programme by Networks, ECER 2021
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
Network 28. Sociologies of Education
Network 29. Reserach on Arts Education
Network 30. Research on Environmental und Sustainability Education
Network 31. Research on Language and Education (LEd)
Network 32. Organizational Education
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
Marginal Content
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.