16 SES 07 A, A European Perspective on Researching Computational Thinking as a Key Competence for 21st Century Learners
Lye and Koh (2014) conceptualized Computational Thinking (CT) as the thinking skills that one can use to solve problems using computer technology. They distinguished between computational concepts - knowledge of CT, computational practices - the thinking skills that are important, and computational perspectives - the attitude component of CT. According to Lye and Koh (2014) computational practices are "problem-solving practices that occur in the process of programming" (p. 53), such as splitting the problem into sub-problems, using loops, iterations, tests and debugging to develop (partial) solutions, and reusing algorithms. They can be developed using programming tools. In this study we used the conceptualization of computational practices to study the thinking skills that young children use to solve a given problem - a simple programming task with a small robot. The study took place in grades two to six (age range 6-12) of a Dutch primary school. Forty-two pairs of children collaborated in the study. The children did not have any previous experience with programming. Pairs were from the same grade and consisted of boy duos (n=11), girl duos (n=16), and mixed duos (n=15). The pairs were asked to articulate their thinking process when solving the problem by thinking out loud. Each pair was video-taped. Based on the work of Hesse et al. (2015) about collaborative problem solving a rubric was developed to analyse the observations. Five sub-skills of CT skills were addressed in the rubric: problem decomposition, abstracting, data ordering, testing and debugging and solving problems. The analysis of the data showed that slightly less than half of the pairs successfully solved the task, in particularly pairs from the higher grades were successful. On average boy duos from the lower grades scored higher on the different sub-skills than girl or mixed duos from the same grade. In the higher grades no difference in average score was found between boy, girl and mixed pairs. Successful pairs structured their work, they collect all information before they start, eliminate options, take the time to go through the (possible) solution and work accurately. Implications for teaching and learning computational thinking skills will be discussed.
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H.L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J. Sassenberg, K. & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problemsolving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37-56). New York: Springer.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.