By ratifying the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN, 2006), Austria agreed to implementing an inclusive educations system. In an inclusive school, diversity is understood as an asset rather than a challenge (Sliwka, 2010). In Austria, currently approximately 65% of the students with disabilities are taught in inclusive classrooms (Statistik Austria, 2019). By implementing a new curriculum in teacher education in 2013 (BMBWF, 2019), Austria set an important step towards a more inclusive school system.
Recent political developments, however, do not necessarily aim at the same direction. Government currently intends to strengthen exclusive tendencies in the education system (Bundeskanzleramt, 2018). By the way of example, students with another first language than German (being the language of instruction in Austria) have been taught in separate classrooms since last year (BMBWF, 2018). With a broad understanding of inclusion as it is, for example, described by the UNESCO (2009) or by Ainscow, Booth and Dyson (2009), inclusion considers all different kinds of students. Ainscow et al. (2009, p.25) describe inclusion as being “concerned with all children and young people in schools; it is focused on presence, participation and achievement; inclusion and exclusion are linked together such that inclusion involves the active combating of exclusion”. In this understanding, not only students with special educational needs (SEN) are the focus of inclusive intentions. Similarly, refugee students, who speak another first language than the language of instruction should, hence, be taught in an inclusive classroom.
Studies have reported that future teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in general are rather positive (for Austria: Schwab & Seifert, 2014). Yet, some concerns are often mentioned when it comes to including certain groups of students into mainstream classrooms. The type of disability has been frequently reported to influence teachers’ attitudes. Students with social-emotional difficulties were often seen as particularly challenging to integrate (e.g. Svecnik, Sixt, & Pieslinger, 2017).
Bešić, Paleczek and Gasteiger-Klicpera (2018) have shown that the general public’s attitude towards inclusion into primary school is influenced by several student characteristics. Gender, refugee status and type of disability played important roles and intersectional disadvantages could be shown. This study – as others (Bešić, Paleczek, Krammer, & Gasteiger-Klicpera, 2018) – has not separated the refugee status from German language skills. In the present study, this intertwining of characteristics is taken into account.
Additionally, the attitudes of future teachers towards inclusion of students in mainstream classrooms (in the broader understanding of inclusion that takes all students – not only those with SEN – into account) have not been focus of research. Since future teachers and their attitudes are crucial factors to successful inclusion, we also wanted to gain more knowledge in this area.
Therefore, the following research questions emerged:
- Do future teachers feel prepared to teach in inclusive classrooms?
- Which groups of students do future teachers perceive as easier to include?
- What do future teachers expect from teacher trainings in order to feel prepared for teaching in diverse classrooms (i.e. content)?