In this paper, we consider why efforts to diversify the academy persistently fall short. To do so, we adapt Leong’s theory of identity capitalism and then apply it to an extensive review of research concerning women’s experiences within the academic labor structure. This review of literature illustrates how—despite their growing presence— women are commodified, undervalued, and kept on the margins of the academy. Following this analytic review of literature, we pair insights from organizational change literature with Leong’s work to sketch out what can be done to facilitate not only diversification, but transformation oriented towards inclusion and epistemic justice. This chapter provides a robust foundation for others interested in critically exploring and tackling racialized and gendered conditions within the global academic profession.

Dee, J. R., & Leišytė, L. (2016). Organizational learning in higher education institutions: Theories, frameworks, and a potential research agenda. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 275-348). Springer, Cham. Dengate, J., Peter, T., & Farenhorst, A. (2019). Gender and the faculty care gap: "The obvious go-to Person" for Canadian university students' personal problems. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(3), 104–114. Dongre, A.A., Singhal, K., & Das, U. (2020). Presence of Women in Economics Academia: Evidence from India. ArXiv: General Economics. Dutt, K. (2021). Addressing racism through ownership. Nature Geoscience, 14(2), 58-58. Edwards, K. T. & del Guadalupe Davidson, M. (2018). College curriculum at the crossroads. Routledge Publishers.